search for: ianall

El 07/05/12 06:23, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: >> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included >> routines and allows distros to centralize crypto mainteniance on >> a few libraries. > > Isn't the OpenSSL license incompatible with GPL? IANAL, but I think > the flac and

Hi, I was wondering if there is a javascript player that uses Media Source Extensions to play Icecast streams on modern browsers. Based on my limited research, the following players do not seem to support Icecast streams: Aurora.js - Icecast does not support HEAD requests, which Aurora.js seems to require. Shaka - Needs DASH manifests, cannot play off a simple URL. IANAL but MPEG LA seems to

It is my understanding that R is licensed under the GPL with the exception of a few header files for the purposes of linking binary code with R under non-GPL licenses. However, the R-base package itself is licensed under the GPL, as are many (but not all) packages in CRAN. Furthermore, basically any R script will use functionality from R-base. As I understand it, the situation isn't

On 2014 Mar 2, at 22:27, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > > On 3 March 2014

Hey guys, I have a question about CrossOver and the LGPL license. I'm looking into licensing some software of my own and I'm not sure if I can. >From what I've read the LGPL license doesn't allow any product to be sold if it's based on LGPL protected software, unless it uses the software simply as a plug-in: > A program that contains no derivative of any portion of the

I'm being PHBed into a VOIP project, and Speex sprang to mind. Bandwidth is going to be a fairly serious issue for us. With regards to a Speex enc/decoder, I was wondering: Rick Kane and David Siebert have already asked about this, but seem to have gotten very different responses - the former a call to arms, and the latter a "well, if you do it, it'll get done." What's the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote: >> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN >>>> we could properly publish that data in some way. >>> >>>

Cristian Rodr?guez <crrodriguez at opensuse.org> wrote: > El 07/05/12 06:23, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?: > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: > >> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included Btw, how much more efficient and on what hardware? Based on previous experience (in a project not related to FLAC) on x86_64

Does anybody know if the updated licence on iLBC makes it safe to include in Asterisk when used in a commercial environment again? https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/ilbc-freeware It seems to require that the Google iLBC licence document is on the box, but that otherwise it is free-to use by all in any way (BSD licence style). I believe that prior to that there was a requirement to register

Hi documentation team, As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good time to think about putting the accurate documentation on http://www.centos.org/docs Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now using the CC-by-SA license. My own understanding (but IANAL) is that we can just share the documentation , and just linking back to upstream

> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could >>> properly publish that data in some way. >> >> It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated >> account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list:

> I'm being PHBed into a VOIP project, and Speex sprang to mind. > Bandwidth is > going to be a fairly serious issue for us. With regards to a Speex > enc/decoder, I was wondering: Rick Kane and David Siebert have already > asked > about this, but seem to have gotten very different responses - the > former a > call to arms, and the latter a "well, if you do it,

I''m trolling for example RSpec code. Any pointers appreciated. Cheers, Obie

>From THE INFOWORLD SCOOP: ============================================================================== MICROSOFT FINALLY PUBLISHES SECRET KERBEROS FORMAT Posted at Apr 28, 2000 04:17 PM MICROSOFT ON FRIDAY published a key proprietary data format that has been at the heart of interoperability questions surrounding "standards-based" Kerberos security in Windows 2000. The data

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Herbie Robinson <HerbieRobinson at verizon.net> wrote: > I have been quietly working on a port of LLVM to Stratus VOS. The OS is > always big endian (because customers need to migrate data to new hardware > quickly and can't afford to convert). This entails presenting a big endian > programming model no matter what the hardware does. We

On 10/27/20 1:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This library proved useful in nbdkit where we need to construct an > array or vector of arbitrary objects, with the easy ability to append > at the end. Wherever code uses realloc(3) to build an array of > objects is a candidate for replacement by this library. > --- > Makefile.am | 1 + >

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Andrew Joakimsen <joakimsen at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Tilghman Lesher > <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote: >> It is completely illegal in any country that recognizes patents. > > You mean countries that recognize software patents, right? As resident of country where the file is hosted - yes we

Hi everyone, first of all, I searched through the archives for any posts resembling this, I didn't read all posts about the patents so if this has been suggested before I apologise. I read in an article on C|Net (I think, it was linked from Slashdot anyway) that Thompson are threatening to sue you if Ogg Vorbis becomes a success. Which is evil, and I'm also mad at them because they never

On 18/01/15 03:45 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote: >>> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: >>>> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be >>>> updated. >>>> >>> >>> Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so

On Dec 27, 2008, at 8:54 PM, Talin wrote: > Although I haven't actually tried Boost.Test, I kind of figured that > this would be the case - that you pretty much have to drink the "Boost > Kool-Aid" in order to use it. I agree, boost.test seems like a non-starter from many reasons. >> So are you planning on maintaining whatever test system, or just have >> them