search for: ianal

...t, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: >> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included >> routines and allows distros to centralize crypto mainteniance on >> a few libraries. > > Isn't the OpenSSL license incompatible with GPL? IANAL, but I think > the flac and metaflac utilities can't be linked with OpenSSL unless > there is an exception in the flac license which would require getting > the permission from all contributors. flac and metaflac do not use openSSL, only libFLAC does. > I'd suggest to use the...

...ource Extensions to play Icecast streams on modern browsers. Based on my limited research, the following players do not seem to support Icecast streams: Aurora.js - Icecast does not support HEAD requests, which Aurora.js seems to require. Shaka - Needs DASH manifests, cannot play off a simple URL. IANAL but MPEG LA seems to have issued a call for patents on DASH. Please do not suggest Flash players. Thanks, ab

...nd basically all R add-on packages) be required to have GPL-compatible licenses is not the intent (especially considering the LGPLed header files mentioned above). R's position is somewhat unique in having much of the base functionality interpreted. In practice, this legal interpretation (IANAL, etc) would require essentially all R packages and other R scripts to be licensed in a GPL-compatible way. Is a legal exception in order here? My apologies if this question is more appropriate for r-users or has been answered elsewhere. Thanks, Logan

...e adaptors. If possible, I'm going to work on contributing a basic selection of them to LLVM's ADT specifically to address the immediate needs of range-based for loops. There’s a decent selection of range adaptors in Boost.Range [1]. I’m not sure the license [2] allows copying the source (IANAL), but any reason not use the same names? I don’t see any reason to reinvent the wheel here. [1]: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/range/doc/html/range/reference/adaptors/reference.html [2]: http://www.boost.org/users/license.html

Hey guys, I have a question about CrossOver and the LGPL license. I'm looking into licensing some software of my own and I'm not sure if I can. >From what I've read the LGPL license doesn't allow any product to be sold if it's based on LGPL protected software, unless it uses the software simply as a plug-in: > A program that contains no derivative of any portion of the

...ASE and ASAO? Are there other free or commercial codecs I should be looking at? Is there maybe an analog to the comparison chart at the website that gives performance characteristics, etc? Or, maybe, even just an idea of the baseline CPU that's realistic for realtime full duplex VOIP? Also, IANAL. The xiph.org variant of the BSD license looks *really* simple, but I'd like to check and be sure. If I were to use Speex in a closed source binary-only commercial product, it would be sufficient to note the copyright and the list of conditions in the manual, yes? (I also intend to put the c...

...sages the bot received. > > I heard that this is actually how the RHEL errata have been put > together, and that it would not be a violation of the ToU to use > the info in the emails. > > Can somebody confirm this? > > Sounds to me like this would be the way to go. Well IANAL, but: imho red hats "terms of service" on their website are not valid , at least in germany (where I happen to live). In germany you can not bind someone to some silly "terms of service" by just displaying them on some random website. you need to agree to those tos actively so...

...ignificantly faster than the equivalent C code (from gnulib). SHA1 was a different story, but I still decided it wasn't worth my time/effort to maintain (especially extra testing time to ensure code works with and without OpenSSL). > > Isn't the OpenSSL license incompatible with GPL? IANAL, but I think > > the flac and metaflac utilities can't be linked with OpenSSL unless > > there is an exception in the flac license which would require getting > > the permission from all contributors. > > flac and metaflac do not use openSSL, only libFLAC does. But sin...

Does anybody know if the updated licence on iLBC makes it safe to include in Asterisk when used in a commercial environment again? https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/ilbc-freeware It seems to require that the Google iLBC licence document is on the box, but that otherwise it is free-to use by all in any way (BSD licence style). I believe that prior to that there was a requirement to register

...entation team, As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good time to think about putting the accurate documentation on http://www.centos.org/docs Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now using the CC-by-SA license. My own understanding (but IANAL) is that we can just share the documentation , and just linking back to upstream without modifying the documentation. That would be easier for newer doc as every 'bit' that is CentOS specific should/would be in our release note wiki page for that version. Read the "Legal Notice&quo...

> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could >>> properly publish that data in some way. >> >> It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated >> account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list:

...out 10 mflops when set to complexity 1 (minimum complexity). With float emulation, this is too slow for an iPaq, but with a fixed-point, it would probably fit easily. I can't say much more because 1) there's no fixed-point yet and 2) I don't know exactly how fast the ARM is. > Also, IANAL. The xiph.org variant of the BSD license looks *really* > simple, > but I'd like to check and be sure. If I were to use Speex in a closed > source binary-only commercial product, it would be sufficient to note > the > copyright and the list of conditions in the manual, yes? (I...

I''m trolling for example RSpec code. Any pointers appreciated. Cheers, Obie

>From THE INFOWORLD SCOOP: ============================================================================== MICROSOFT FINALLY PUBLISHES SECRET KERBEROS FORMAT Posted at Apr 28, 2000 04:17 PM MICROSOFT ON FRIDAY published a key proprietary data format that has been at the heart of interoperability questions surrounding "standards-based" Kerberos security in Windows 2000. The data

...ul for when you flip the bits, but need to try to triage exactly where the problem is 2) As other stated - the llvm ir is relatively easy for this - most of our changes are on the clang side 3) Be *very* careful about patents. There are a number of compiler companies that patents around this area. IANAL and I would not typically say this, but it's something which llvm should approach cautiously and probably get advice on before accepting patches. /* I have full docs on what we've done, but it's not public. I can share with any interested parties */ Thanks

On 10/27/20 1:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This library proved useful in nbdkit where we need to construct an > array or vector of arbitrary objects, with the easy ability to append > at the end. Wherever code uses realloc(3) to build an array of > objects is a candidate for replacement by this library. > --- > Makefile.am | 1 + >

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Andrew Joakimsen <joakimsen at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Tilghman Lesher > <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote: >> It is completely illegal in any country that recognizes patents. > > You mean countries that recognize software patents, right? As resident of country where the file is hosted - yes we

...a problem with this, which is that it may in fact then be illegal to create .ogg.gz files without a license from them, but it would be pretty hard for them to hold that since they don't have any patents on transforming audio data or on entropy encoding random data, just the combination. Well, IANAL, but I thought that it might be useful. Cheers, Lourens --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe'...

...oth are filled with mysteries, puzzles, and unanswered questions. > > Therefore, lets do the right thing - get the means together in community > to adapt those docs, brand them accordingly and publish them under > centos.org Is it legal to copy the documentation and replace trademarks? IANAL... :) Alternatively, if we can't copy RHEL docs, can we copy Fedora 12~13, 18~19 docs and adapt as needed? Or would be have to write everything from scratch? -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access...

...t;, I see no > barrier > to shipping a combined product with different portions falling under > different licenses. Thus, the unit tests themselves would still fall > under the LLVM license, and linking the unit tests with gtest would > not > violate either license. Of course, IANAL. The licenses coexist. Please just add an entry to the llvm/ LICENSES.txt file. > My personal goal is that one should be able to check out the head of > LLVM on a generic Linux/OS-X system, with only the standard > development > environment (i.e. make/gcc/etc) and type "make...