search for: i487

...machine with several X100 cards certainly is > multicomputer. > > > b) X100 MIC devices have always been referred to Coprocessors and never > > as multicomputers in product specifications @ > > http://software.intel.com/en-us/mic-developer > > Coprocessor sounds like i487, but why not. > > > c) multicomputer is a very long path name. > > Agreed it is long. drivers/coproc? > > [I guess we'll get similar hardware from different vendors in > future. It would make sense having it at common place.] > drivers/coproc is a good, short su...

...machine with several X100 cards certainly is > multicomputer. > > > b) X100 MIC devices have always been referred to Coprocessors and never > > as multicomputers in product specifications @ > > http://software.intel.com/en-us/mic-developer > > Coprocessor sounds like i487, but why not. > > > c) multicomputer is a very long path name. > > Agreed it is long. drivers/coproc? > > [I guess we'll get similar hardware from different vendors in > future. It would make sense having it at common place.] > drivers/coproc is a good, short su...

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:43 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > for applications. A key benefit of our solution is that it leverages >

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:43 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > for applications. A key benefit of our solution is that it leverages >

...o X100 is not a multicomputer, but machine with several X100 cards certainly is multicomputer. > b) X100 MIC devices have always been referred to Coprocessors and never > as multicomputers in product specifications @ > http://software.intel.com/en-us/mic-developer Coprocessor sounds like i487, but why not. > c) multicomputer is a very long path name. Agreed it is long. drivers/coproc? [I guess we'll get similar hardware from different vendors in future. It would make sense having it at common place.] Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky...