search for: i20

...the missing workstation packages in the entry server repository. The system was redhat up2date until yesterday, so the latest kernel was missing. I changed redhat-release to centos-release packages and the new centos kernel was installed the via yum. This kernel does not boot. Error messages: i20:iop0: Get status timeout i20:iop0: Reset timeout i20:iop0: could not reset controller i20:iop0: Reset timeout kernel panic Here are my findings when setting emulation in scsi adapter bios to i2o: - initial redhat el5 install fails, no adapter found (mayby centos install is affected, too, have to...

Note: I don't know if this is a problem withe I20 drivers or Rsync so I'm submitting to both the Kernel Bugzilla and the Rsync mailing list. I couldn't find a bugzilla for Rsync. I hope this was the correct way to submit this issue. Distribution: Debian Hardware Environment: Intel 850MV Mother board, Pentium 4 processor, 1Gig of RAM,...

I'm trying to install either 32-bit or 64 bit centos 4.3 and I keep getting an error: "No valid devices were found on which to install filesystems". In checking BIOS and RAID, everything seems fine, but I just found some research about I20. An alternative would be the i2o_blocks module. How can I install CentOS 4.3 x86_64 using i2o_blocks? How do I instruct the boot prompt to find this driver and get me past the above error? Even in 32-bit I still get this error as well. -karl

Hi Jianzhou, > The other question is about 'when loading a value of a type like i20 > with a size that is not an integral number of bytes, the result is > undefined if the value was not originally written using a store of the > same type'. At this case, can we make an assumption that typically we > only load the 20 bits, but ignore extra bits, like what store does...

...I recently created a version of llvm/clang for an architecture with some odd properties: - front end side: -- char,short,int : 20 bits -- long, long long: 40 bits -- pointer: 20 bits On the backend side, I have hardware support for 20-bit registers (and load/stores). (So, I have support for 'i20' and 'i40', but 'i40' is lowered into operations on 'i20') In order to achieve this, I did need to modify a number of generic llvm and clang files. I was wondering if other people would be interested to see support for these kind of architectures in llvm and if llvm/cl...

...9;t match the objects'. In C, they need to be compatible, which means the size of types should be same, otherwise undefined. Do we follow the same convention in LLVM IR? Does GEP also follow similar rules when types mismatch? The other question is about 'when loading a value of a type like i20 with a size that is not an integral number of bytes, the result is undefined if the value was not originally written using a store of the same type'. At this case, can we make an assumption that typically we only load the 20 bits, but ignore extra bits, like what store does at such a case. Is t...

...ime I am running a nested model. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Mat cov.matrix<-cov(na.omit(df)) cfa.model<-specifyModel() F1->i2,a1 F1->i3,a2 F1->i4,a3 F1->i11,a4 F1->i12,a5 F1->i15,a6 F1->i18,a7 F2->i6,b1 F2->i7,b2 F2->i8,b3 F2->i13,b4 F2->i20,b5 F3->F1,c1 F3->F2,c2 F4->i1,d1 F4->i5,d2 F4->i9,d3 F4->i10,d4 F4->i14,d5 F4->i16,d6 F4->i17,d7 F4->i19,d8 F1<->F1,NA,1 F2<->F2,NA,1 F3<->F3,NA,1 F4<->F4,NA,1 i2<->i2,error1 i4<->i4,error2 i6<->i6,error3 i7<->i7,error4 i...

R users, I have df like this a <- data.frame( indx = 1:20, var1 = rep(c("I20", "I40", "A50", "B60"), each=5), var1_lab= rep(c("cat", "dog", "mouse", "horse"), each=5), var2 = rep(c("B20", "X40", "D50", "G60"), each=5),...

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

...s i have disabled "Reserve PCI Bus Numbers" as described in this document: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/HP-HOWTO/hp-hardware.html#AEN792 these fixes have made the megaraid driver stop complaining about IRQ conflicts or routing errors. 2) i have tried switching each NetRAID controller from I20 to "Mass Storage" mode; no change. 3) i have tried manually adding the i2o_block driver; no change. has anyone encountered similar problems with this hardware? better yet, has anyone resolved them? any other ideas? do i need to do anything to the logical volumes on the NetRAIDs o...

Hi everyone, I would like to subset a data.frame using partial values. For example I have the following data.frame: PROCHI Main_condition 1234 411 1235 4110 1236 4111 1237 I20 1238 I201 1239 I202 Now let's say that I use the Subset function. Ordinarily I would use it as follows Subset(x, Main_condition=="411"|Main_condition=="4110" etc to get all the 411s. Is there a way that you can subset by only using part of the term that you wish to...

...3322 2213241223212322222223333 3113244123342212232312334 2113241123342213232313334 2114141123112214222113334 . . . . The syntax is: AGGREGATE /OUTFILE='C:\Documents and Settings\Coraz?n\Mis documentos\copia.sav' /BREAK=i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 i16 i17 i18 i19 i20 i21 i22 i23 i24 i25 /N_BREAK=N. The results is: 1112241123312213222443444 1 2111141123112212312313334 1 2111141123112414212113344 2 2111241123112311124312231 1 2111341122112111412113341 1 2111341123312213312413334 1 2112141123212213212213334 1 2112211122212413421213221 1 211224111331231...

Release notes say no support for the RAID card in a box I just picked up...is there no hope for this box running 2.6 kernel? http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release- notes/as-x86/ The kernel shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 includes the new megaraid_mbox driver from LSI Logic, which replaces the megaraid driver. The megaraid_mbox driver has an improved design,

...tention is to take factors out of DF, create list of tables and export these tables separately using write.table or sink function. write.table writes tables out as DF:s, should I use sink instead? Here is my example: a <- data.frame( indx = 1:20, var1 = rep(c("I20", "I40", "A50", "B60"), each=5), var1_lab= rep(c("cat", "dog", "mouse", "horse"), each=5), var2 = rep(c("B20", "X40", "D50", "G60"), each=5),...

...;> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> >> > > -- > Paul Muntean > Lehrstuhl für Sicherheit in der Informatik, I20 > Prof. Dr. Claudia Eckert > Institut für Informatik TU-München > Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany > Tel.: ++49 (89) 289 - 18566 > Fax : ++49 (89) 289 - 18579 > Room: 01.08.055 > E-Mail: paul at sec.in.tum.de <mailto:paul at sec.in.tum.de> > https://www.sec.in...

Hi Paul, It is the 4th time in two weeks that you repost the exact same two emails, that’s a bit high repost rate for the mailing-list, especially considering that you already got answers that you ignored previously: - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108060.html - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108051.html Adding an alternate email in case you

PS: For a small optimization, in the case where Amt is bigger than 32 (or whatever NVTBits is) you might want to use an "and" to mask off the top bits of Amt rather than subtracting 32 (if Amt is 64 or greater then the result of the shift was undefined anyway, so it is ok to mask off all the upper bits).

...imization would help us much. Our architecture performs integer shifts and subtractions at the same speed. I think the optimization is limited to the case where NVBits is a power of two. That is the case for all current value types but there's a separate thread where someone is proposing adding i20 as a native type. In your previous email you mentioned some comments added to check-in 90564. In our architecture shifting by 0 doesn't cause any problems but the comment might be valid for others. Thanks, Javier On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:42:36 +0100, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wr...

On 10/20/2016 9:28 AM, Cameron McInally via llvm-dev wrote: > I should have attached the generated asm to save some trouble. > Apologies for that and attaching now... > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Cameron McInally > <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:

Duncan, Thanks for committing a fix. I see that you fixed a bug in my patch with the HiL in the case of an SRA. The issue with a test case is that it will depend on the target to expose it. Like you noted in the check-in comment x86 doesn't expose the bug. The target I'm working on isn't public. Short of writing a new one for the purpose of a test case I don't know what else to