search for: i18

...0, 0x15c9bbd98:1 0x15c9bb920: i32 = TargetConstant<0> 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0 0x15c9bbd98: ch,glue = MYISD::CALL 0x15c9bbcc8, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0, Register:i32 %I18, Register:i32 %I17, Register:i32 %I16, Register:i32 %I15, RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x15c9bbcc8:1 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0 0x15c9bb9f0: i32 = Register %I18 0x15c9bbac0: i32 = Register %I17 0x15c9bbb90: i32 = Regist...

...c9bb920: i32 = TargetConstant<0> > 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* > @__assert_func> 0 > 0x15c9bbd98: ch,glue = MYISD::CALL 0x15c9bbcc8, > TargetGlobalAddress:i32<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0, > Register:i32 %I18, Register:i32 %I17, Register:i32 %I16, Register:i32 %I15, > RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x15c9bbcc8:1 > 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* > @__assert_func> 0 > 0x15c9bb9f0: i32 = Register %I18 > 0x15c9bbac0: i32 = Register %I17 >...

...TargetGlobalAddress:i32<i32 (i32)* @foo> 0, 0x1ede6ae35e0:1 0x1ede6ae33d8: i32 = TargetConstant<0> 0x1ede6ae3370: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<i32 (i32)* @foo> 0 0x1ede6ae35e0: ch,glue = MyISD::CALL 0x1ede6ae3510, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<i32 (i32)* @foo> 0, Register:i32 %I18, RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x1ede6ae3510:1 0x1ede6ae3370: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<i32 (i32)* @foo> 0 0x1ede6ae34a8: i32 = Register %I18 0x1ede6ae3578: Untyped = RegisterMask 0x1ede6ae3510: ch,glue = CopyToReg 0x1ede6ae3440, Register:i32 %I18, Constant:i32<42> 0x1ede6...

...ed". I have run CFA before with no issues. This is the first time I am running a nested model. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Mat cov.matrix<-cov(na.omit(df)) cfa.model<-specifyModel() F1->i2,a1 F1->i3,a2 F1->i4,a3 F1->i11,a4 F1->i12,a5 F1->i15,a6 F1->i18,a7 F2->i6,b1 F2->i7,b2 F2->i8,b3 F2->i13,b4 F2->i20,b5 F3->F1,c1 F3->F2,c2 F4->i1,d1 F4->i5,d2 F4->i9,d3 F4->i10,d4 F4->i14,d5 F4->i16,d6 F4->i17,d7 F4->i19,d8 F1<->F1,NA,1 F2<->F2,NA,1 F3<->F3,NA,1 F4<->F4,NA,1 i2<->i2,erro...

I've got a user that wants Japanese language support in firefox... our *stock* CentOS firefox, 24.3. I've yum installed i18, and i10, and no joy. Looked at firefox addons, and there's one, 27.0. Won't install, "not compatible". Neither is either 24.0, or 25.0. Anyone have a link to a compatible version? mark

...t;imp-def,dead>, %I_STATE<imp-def,dead>; IRF32:%vreg3,%vreg2 LSU_STO_i32_Myr2 %vreg3<kill>, <fi#1>, 0, pred:1, pred:%noreg, 7; mem:Volatile ST4[%x] IRF32:%vreg3 %vreg4<def> = LSU_LDO_i32_Myr2 <fi#1>, 0, pred:1, pred:%noreg, 7; mem:Volatile LD4[%x] IRF32:%vreg4 %I18<def> = COPY %vreg4; IRF32:%vreg4 SHAVE_RETURN %I18 # End machine code for function main. Thanks for any helpful response. -- Naveed Ul Mustafa

...uite explicit. In the example, only 16 bits from a 32 bit variable in IR are demanded and therefore the variable is truncated to a 16 bit variable. %1 = add i32 %x, %y %2 = trunc i32 %1 to i16 However I was wondering if for example, the addition demanded, say 18 bits, would this pass generate a i18 integer variable? I have not done the experiment, but I would like to know beforehand if this is something that this pass can do. Regards, Raul. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170518/dd99...

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

...233333343322 2213241223212322222223333 3113244123342212232312334 2113241123342213232313334 2114141123112214222113334 . . . . The syntax is: AGGREGATE /OUTFILE='C:\Documents and Settings\Coraz?n\Mis documentos\copia.sav' /BREAK=i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 i16 i17 i18 i19 i20 i21 i22 i23 i24 i25 /N_BREAK=N. The results is: 1112241123312213222443444 1 2111141123112212312313334 1 2111141123112414212113344 2 2111241123112311124312231 1 2111341122112111412113341 1 2111341123312213312413334 1 2112141123212213212213334 1 2112211122212413421213221 1 2112241...

...indexes in getelementptr: %sp = getelementptr [4 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0 I think I understand now, but would be gracious if somebody could correct/clarify for me: 1. "@.str" represents a pointer to the data when it is used 2. the first 0 index to getelementptr is thus of type [4 x i18], if I stopped here the type of %sp would b e [4 x i8]* 3. the second 0 index is to the first i8 of that array, by doing this the resulting type is now i8* (suitable for printf) Are the following two forms, to get the one-past-end pointer, also equivalent: they result in the same pointer value an...

...te, so that all special characters are shown correctly? I have rad many newsgroup-postings saying: try and error, but with many servers and updates you get fuzzy very quick! As a programmer (but on windowsside) I think (hope), there should be a logical way to solve this. Some said: Adjust your i18.conf configuration but this will not work for me because I had to adjust it to see the local fat and ntfs partitions correctly. Does anyone have some hints for me? Thanks!

...loop > %tmp43.i.i = fsub float 1.000000e+00, %tmp38.i.i > br label %phi.exit.i > > phi.exit.i: ; preds = %cond.then.i.i, %entry.header.loop > %cond.i.i = phi float [ %tmp43.i.i, %cond.then.i.i ], [ %tmp38.i.i, %entry.header.loop ] > %call.i18.i = tail call float @fabs(float %tmp56.i) nounwind > %tmp5.i23.i = fmul float %call.i18.i, 0x3FCDA67120000000 > %tmp6.i24.i = fadd float %tmp5.i23.i, 1.000000e+00 > %tmp7.i25.i = fdiv float 1.000000e+00, %tmp6.i24.i > %tmp11.i29.i = fsub float -0.000000e+00, %tmp56.i > %tmp13.i3...

Hello everybody, I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the source IR on both systems is the same. Try compiling the attached module: llc -O3 -filetype=asm -o BAD.s BAD.ll Under

I am trying to write a function that will solve a simple system of nonlinear equations for the parameters that describe the beta distribution (a,b) given the mean and variance. mean = a/(a+b) variance = (a*b)/(((a+b)^2) * (a+b+1)) Any help as to where to start would be welcome. -- Scott Story Graduate Student MSU Ecology Department 319 Lewis Hall Bozeman, Mt 59717 406.994.2670 sstory at

...ot.i16 = xor <4 x i32> %bitcast6.i13, < i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1 > ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %andnps.i17 = add <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>, %not.i16 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %orps.i18 = or <4 x i32> %andnps.i17, %andps.i14 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %bitcast17.i19 = bitcast <4 x i32> %orps.i18 to <4 x float> ; <<4 x float>> [#uses=1] >> - %tmp83 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse.mi...

...i1 %cmp5.2.i13.i.i.i, label %for.inc.2.i16.i.i.i, label %if.then3.i.i.i for.inc.2.i16.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.1.i14.i.i.i %102 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.2.i50.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.3.i15.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %102, 0 br i1 %cmp5.3.i15.i.i.i, label %for.inc.3.i18.i.i.i, label %if.then3.i.i.i for.inc.3.i18.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.2.i16.i.i.i %103 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.3.i51.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.4.i17.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %103, 0 br i1 %cmp5.4.i17.i.i.i, label %for.inc.4.i20.i.i.i, label %if.then3.i.i.i for.inc....