search for: hs4233

I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration in one of them. On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> wrote: > I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 > > When issueing the command > > $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ > .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ > -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ >...

fucking hell, listserv... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Wilfred L. Guerin" <wilfredguerin at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:54:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Segment Register Use To: Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> I was very much expecting this style of response ;) I believe the following characteristics and class of example should demonstrate the concerns in all models, as I know significant research in massive data tables has been undertaken for decades... First: In favourin...

I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 When issueing the command $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ -lcrypto -lusb -lutil -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread I get this output: Linking bitcode file '.obj/conf.o' Linked in file '.obj/conf.o' Linking

I realize I am one of the few who uses the segment registers (especially CS and DS) on the ia32 chips for example, and a definite few with complete segregation models that rival specialized physical processors... GCC still fails to use these correctly and if your LLVM still depends on either Generic or some of the RTL models they use in various processor definitions, I express concern for

Hello All, Sorry to rehash a question I am sure has shown several time but I cannot google up the answer from the lists. Does anyone know where I can get some royalty free, cost free music for my music on hold? I saw someone's post several weeks ago that said that this exists at a download site but I have not been able to find it. Thanks! Wiley Siler -------------- next

I yesterday brought up to date the version of * the CVS and now I have a problem. I cannot effect the RELOAD that * it breaks. Somebody can help or say as to load new users without stopping * ? Thank?s Excuse my English Joao Carlos Moura

...question. Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 23:22 +0200, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains > definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration > in one of them. > > On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> wrote: > > I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 > > > > When issueing the command > > > > $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ > > .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ > > -L/usr/shar...

This implements -dry-run for llvmc2: $ llvmc2 -dry-run main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -emit-llvm llc -f /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.bc -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s llvm-gcc -c -x assembler /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.s -o /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o llvm-gcc /tmp/llvm_bGw2gN/main.o -o a.out $ llvmc2 -dry-run -opt main.c llvm-g++ -c -x c main.c -o /tmp/llvm_UGZtwL/main.bc -emit-llvm opt

> If you use bison instead of yacc this bug is not exposed. > > Is this correct behavior? I guess so. bison is quite different to yacc, see "info bison". llvm depends on bison and this is quite well documented. At http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/GettingStarted.html#software it says "bison" and specifically which version of Bison you've to use.

> The idea is to use llvm to put performance sensitive code into > a DLL that a Windows app can then use. > > This would build the performance sensitive code on the target > machine making it possible to exploit CPU specific x86 > vector instructions. Isn't this what Apple does with OpenGL, except that they skip the DLL step?

Are JIT DLLs supported? The idea is to use llvm to put performance sensitive code into a DLL that a Windows app can then use. This would build the performance sensitive code on the target machine making it possible to exploit CPU specific x86 vector instructions. The code that calls fn's in the DLL should, ideally, be unaware that a llvm JIT is being used. -- Øyvind Harboe

I received a sample IP/Speakerphone from my friends in China today. Asterisk setup was fairly uncomplicated and I had it running as an extension on my server within a few minutes. Sounds quality of both the receiver and the speakerphone are fine (wife's opinion). Are there any tests I should run with this phone? Following are the specs: - Single line appearance - Alpha display, 2x16 chars -

....digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation (look at the > "Unofficial Links") and http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk and > http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/ (my site) and > http://asteriskdocs.org/ > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] STILL NO AUDIO > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:32:14 +0200 > Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > > I WANT TO USE G729, I HAVE TO USE IT... > > When you have no FW and no N...

...gp key available by finger, fingerprint: <petersv@psv.nu> ! 8A E9 20 98 C1 FF 43 E3 07 FD B9 0A 80 72 70 AF ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Remember, Luke, your source will be with you... always... --__--__-- Message: 4 From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZAPHFC - only for * 0.7.2? Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:59:33 +0200 Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > I've got Zaphfc working running Asterisk v. 0.7.2 > > Then I have tried with Asterisk...

Hi ! I've fetched a spare AVM B1 card from the cellar, and installed it. After "modprobe b1pci" I did "capiinit" and capiinit moaned about a missing t1.b4. So I search the web and found one at http://www.avm.de/ftp/cardware/b1/x_misc/ddi/. When I now look at the controller, I finally see p2p-mode: # cat /proc/capi/controllers/1 name b1pciv4-a400 io

Hi ! I just wrote cdr_sqlite.c, see http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001986 This little app creates automatically the sqlite database file in /var/log/asterisk/cdr.db, creates a table 'cdr' inside it and inserts all CDR records into this table. Please comment. I'll use this in my project DESTAR (http://www.holgerschurig.de/destar.html) to show these

Hi ! I'm quite confused. When I look at http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4-2/trunk/README.LLVM I read "First, check out LLVM from CVS" ... but isn't LLVM now in Subversion?

In http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4-2/trunk/README.LLVM I can read "Below we assume the LLVM OBJDIR is $LLVMOBJDIR". But in http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#terminology I read about OBJ_ROOT. Is this the same? Then terminology is inconsistent. But actually I don't think so, because the text says "These are not environment variables". Still it's

Index: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp =================================================================== --- llvm.orig/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp 2007-07-14 16:59:23.000000000 +0200 +++ llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp 2007-07-14 16:59:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ } } break; - case ISD::EH_RETURN: + case ISD::EH_RETURN: {

When you do $ llvm-bcanalyzer hello.o | less you won't see anything, because bcanalyzer sends all of it's output to stderr. However, it get's it right when asked for help: $ llvm-bcanalyzer --help | less