search for: hobbyists

I'm running the Bind nameserver on CentOS 4.2. Can anyone tell me where the cached lookups are stored and whether there is a way to view them? -- Iain M Lee

I have two version 1.6 Asterisks running. One is a small hobbyist thing just at home, and the other is handling calls for several customers. On both, I have added the line exten => h,1,Set(CDR(hangupcause)=${HANGUPCAUSE}) to all relevant contexts. On my little hobbyist box this works perfectly; all calls have their hangupcauses recorded with cdr_adaptive_odbc and cdr_custom. On the

>> Perhaps, I suppose, I'm not sure just how portable llvm code is. > > Very portable AFAICT. I'm even going to port it to my hobbyist OS once C++ > rtti is totally gone in the llvm code base. Sorry, I meant source portable to different compilers (ie: which compilers does llvm compile on & how many have really poor std::string implementations). - David

Hello everyone, My name is Alex, I'm hobbyist compiler hacker who lives in Berlin, Germany now. I'm thinking about organising "LLVM Social" meetups in Berlin, however I don't really know how many people are here, and how many of them are interested in getting in touch. If you want to participate or have any questions - feel free to answer to this thread, or to send me a

We are pleased to announce the first LLVM Cauldron, to be held on Thursday September 8th 2016 in Hebden Bridge, UK. This is the day before the GNU Tools Cauldron being held at the same venue, so we hope to take advantage of the high concentration of compiler enthusiasts and to encourage lots of cross-pollination between communities. This will be a one-day conference with a single talks track and

Appreciations for the initiative! There are some people in the Berlin C++ user group [1] who may be interested. Also there was an active compiler meetup group [3] a few years ago. As far as I know these guys mostly joined the Strange Group Berlin [2], but may still be interested in a more compiler-focused meetup. For the people cc'd: please let us know who'd like to participate in a LLVM

.... Most of the companies and big projects "could" afford to do that. But there are two big points that people like me, Paul and David have been unsuccessfully trying to make obvious: 1. Not every LLVM user is as big as FreeBSD, Sony or Apple. There are a lot of very interesting projects (hobbyists, academia, professional) using Clang, LLVM, libc++, etc. that don't have the staff to do that move. Being a hobbyist myself, I know too well that, when a library radically changes the way they behave (like boost did every new release about 10 years ago), I will stop using it. 2. Changes in com...

> Perhaps, I suppose, I'm not sure just how portable llvm code is. Very portable AFAICT. I'm even going to port it to my hobbyist OS once C++ rtti is totally gone in the llvm code base.

Am 05.04.2015 um 17:11 schrieb buhorojo: > I was born this millennium that's hopefully a joke otherwise you should refrain from try educate veteran admins about the existence of basic configs like logindfes use Google and try to find out about the reputation of Rowland Penny in context of samba while step back a little from your childishness -------------- next part -------------- A

Hi guys, I am starting project to develop open implementation of some (naturally open codec) for simply designed embedded devices which can be used by small to big VoIP operators or hobbyists which wants to build their own small and low cost VoIP phone. Speex seems to be great choice. And greater will be if there should be some guys who want to help ;-). Altought I am experienced in C/ASM programming I haven't so much experiencies in field of voice processing codecs etc. Is the...

This is not specifically Asterisk-related, but I think that sometimes a "pre-emptive" clue is a good thing. Viking Electronics (http://www.vikingelectronics.com/) has some neat widgets that attach to phone lines, which I'm sure many of the people on this list would find at least somewhat useful in conjunction with their Asterisk systems. Many of the widgets can be replaced with

----- Original Message ----- > From:Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> > To:centos at centos.org > Cc: > Sent:Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 13:21 > Subject:Re: [CentOS] KILL THIS THREAD ( Centos 6 Update?) > > +100 !!!! > > Kai Anybody that thinks this thread can be "killed" is so badly mis-understanding the situation. This thread or others like it

Has anyone tried to get FreeBSD+Wine+AnarchyOnline running? I have never tried getting a larger game like that running under wine since I am just a small time unix hobbyist. I was wondering if anyone thought it possible? .. if yes has anyone tried it ? For those who tried it what were the results?

> Problem is, there are REALLY bad std::string implementations out there in > widely used c++ runtimes. No doubt - though widely used to build llvm/clang? Perhaps, I suppose, I'm not sure just how portable llvm code is. > StringRef/Twine is efficient everywhere. Yep - I'm just pedantic about having a tidy codebase, and duplicate code to workaround bad implementations when

Hi, So Lennon got me going with my database-less Camping app, but I''ve just realized that, I have no deployment strategy. This app is to provide a GUI front end to our FUN3D fluid flow simulation monster, which is used by ourselves, companies, universities, hobbyists, and the military. The end result of which, is a file of (key, value) pairs read by FUN3D. Requiring our users to have Camping installed is too much to ask. While we could host the Camping app, the hassle of getting it approved by our IT folks is daunting, and requiring an Internet connection is...

...>>> >>> But there are two big points that people like me, Paul and David have >>> been unsuccessfully trying to make obvious: >>> >>> 1. Not every LLVM user is as big as FreeBSD, Sony or Apple. There are >>> a lot of very interesting projects (hobbyists, academia, professional) >>> using Clang, LLVM, libc++, etc. that don't have the staff to do that >>> move. Being a hobbyist myself, I know too well that, when a library >>> radically changes the way they behave (like boost did every new >>> release about 10...

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:30 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] me being stupid: me vs the llvm codebase... > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, BGB wrote: >> even more interestingly: if the same compiler were also used for static

I'm an asterisk hobbyist, and I've got my hands on some cisco 9971's preloaded with SIP (I think they might only come in SIP flavour actually?). I am quite excited about the possibilities with this kit - especially video calls. Unlike the earlier Cisco phones (e.g. 79 series), these can't be used standalone, and require a TFTP server to get their config. After many hours of

...g projects "could" afford to do that. > > But there are two big points that people like me, Paul and David have > been unsuccessfully trying to make obvious: > > 1. Not every LLVM user is as big as FreeBSD, Sony or Apple. There are > a lot of very interesting projects (hobbyists, academia, professional) > using Clang, LLVM, libc++, etc. that don't have the staff to do that > move. Being a hobbyist myself, I know too well that, when a library > radically changes the way they behave (like boost did every new > release about 10 years ago), I will stop using it...

Folks I'm sure the Centos team has done a yeoman's job getting Centos7 ready, and that the Redhat team has done marvels in creating rhel7, but here's a little voice from a personal hobbyist user. Background: ('ve been maintaining several remote servers since Redhat 6 days, migrating from that to Whitebox, then Centos, and things have been running as expected including the