search for: hll

Hi, it's my first time to write a loop with R for my homework. This loop is part of the function. I wanna assign values for hll according to panel [ii,1]=pp. I didn't get any error message in this part. but then when I further calculate another stuff with hll, the function can't return. I think it must be some problem in my loop. Probably something stupid or easy. But I tried to look for previous posts in forum and...

...rectory, and the consistency of the data made it an easy task. I had a motherboard failure on my main computer, and I was trying to recreate the nut-website hierarchy on another machine. I realized that I was a little confused as to how everything goes together. Is the most recent branch "ddl-hll" in the ddl submodule? Is this the current layout? nut-website (branch: dll-hll) \__ nut submodule (branch: master) \__ ddl submodule (branch unknown?) The "ddl" branch might be unknown since I have the nut-website master branch checked out, and I wasn't sure whether to mess...

...ng comments here that it's due for a rewrite from scratch, and that various people were looking into it. Can anyone go into more detail as to what exactly is wrong with the C backend, and whether this rewrite is happening? The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation is still pretty basic (e.g. http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) and I'm not certain as to whether LLVMTargetMachine is...

> Is this the current layout? > > nut-website (branch: dll-hll) > \__ nut submodule (branch: master) > \__ ddl submodule (branch unknown?) nut-website (branch: dll-hll) \__ nut submodule (branch: master @ abc0006 [not updated to avoid conflicts when merging back to master]) \__ ddl submodule (branch: master @ bbfd79f; now updated to ab6166c) > T...

...due > for a rewrite from scratch, and that various people were looking into > it. Can anyone go into more detail as to what exactly is wrong with the > C backend, and whether this rewrite is happening? > > The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my > HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff > like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation > is still pretty basic (e.g. > http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) > and I'm not certain as to whether L...

...lem with the current C backend is that there is no legalize phase. So you end up seeing vector types and all sorts of non-C nonsense. It's just overall much cleaner to generate code using the generic framework. > The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my > HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff > like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation > is still pretty basic (e.g. > http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) > and I'm not certain as to whether L...

...more clear from the first. Actually, I am working on emitting out an assembly of VM by using LLVM. LLVM assembly looks similar with this VM assembly except BB. The VM assembly does not have the explicit concept of BB. (I know this is quite foreign.) For this reason, this assembly looks like more HLL. ('for' statement is a mnemonic for looping in this assembly. :-( ) For example, the VM assembly looks like the following for the simple C code I showed you before. (I write it again, for your convenience.) ---------------------------------------------------------- void f_loop(long* c, lon...

...resentation must be able to discriminate between operations having differing semantics specified? For example processors like TI's C6X family DSP's support both saturating and 2's-comp operations; and although likely less frequently required, and typically not directly supported by any HLL languages, being able to specify target neutral in-line assembly 1's-comp end-around-carry operations can be helpful on occasion, so would be nice to see as well.

Hi All, I've been having a little trouble with creating a loop that will run a a series of t.tests for inspection, Below is the code i've tried, and some checks i've looked at. I've used the get(paste()) idea as i was told previously that the use of the eval should try and be avoided. I've run a single syntax to check that my systax is correct and works without any problems

...their backend utilizing such patterns, since it can really affects performance. I have done my own estimations for the processor (soft core) i'm developing (not a VLIW but exploits intrinsic ILP) and I can 2x or 3x loss performance if MIMO patterns can not be matched. Of course this stands for HLL application programming for the processor. Kind regards Nikolaos Kavvadias

...l.dtd"> <html> <head> <title> Harte &amp; Lyne Limited - Depot Demo </title> <link href="/stylesheets/scaffold.css" media="all" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="/stylesheets/HLL.css" media="all" rel="Stylesheet" type="text/css" /> </head> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The app/views/store/checkout.rhtml produces this: #----------------------------------------------------------...

...at libguestfs installs an atexit(3) handler to try to clean up handles that are open when the program exits. This means that this callback might be called indirectly from exit(3), which can cause unexpected problems in higher-level languages (eg. if your HLL interpreter has already been cleaned up by the time this is called, and if your callback then jumps into some HLL function). If no callback is registered: the handle is closed without any callback being invoked. GUESTFS_EVENT_SUBPROCESS_QUIT (payload type:...

On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, David Given wrote: > I am interested in using LLVM to translate C and C++ into high-level > language code. (As an update to an earlier project of mine, Clue, which > used the Sparse compiler library to do this: it targets Lua, Javascript, > Perl 5, C, Java and Common Lisp, with a disturbing amount of success. > See http://cluecc.sourceforge.net for

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:39:18 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd-flac@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:45:05 -0800 (PST) > > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > OK, thanks, checked in. once linux-ppc is ironed out the > > > release should be ready to go. > >

...is a criminal act. byrnejb at vcs-git.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca''s password: Counting objects: 9, done. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 607 bytes, done. Total 5 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0) To ssh://byrnejb at vcs-git.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca/var/data/vcs-git/hll/proforma.git ab5353b..b4d1133 master -> master $ <--- Now, when anyone pulls from the canonical repository they will get Rspec and Rspec-on-Rails as well, but as submodules pulled directly from the RSpec repositories. Further, updating all submodules thereafter requires just these thr...

...e does? If so, that would be ideal for what I want. [...] > Once I get the new C backend checked in (next week, hopefully), it may > be helpful as a guide. Excellent --- I'll wait for that, then. Will it be announced here? [...] > LLVM IR throws too much information away to target a HLL > effectively. The thing is, I explicitly don't want to use the Clang AST --- I'm not interested in producing an idiomatic translation, merely a fast-performing one. Clue in its current lousy state has proven that this is possible; without any optimisation I'm getting C-to-Java at 6...

...ur libtool was not detected as being 1.5.10 I think it's because library does not seem to be linked with my tool. Would you mind helping me again to resolve this problem? Thank you very much. Seung Jae Lee >>While making my code for LLVM backend, I'd indeed like to >>convert HLL to the text assembly code for my new >>architecture. >>I registered my target through >>RegisterTarget<XccTargetMachine> X("xcc", "XCC"); >>in XccTargetMachine.cpp. Your response: Make sure that the library is being linked into your tool. This...

On 04/25/2017 06:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/25/2017 01:58 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: >> Quick?n?(really) dirty SELinux howto: > > > Alternate process: > > 1: setenforce permissive > 2: tail -f /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep AVC > 3: use the service, exercise each function that's constrained by the > existing policy > 4: copy and paste the

> If x is a local variable, it will be stored on the stack. So you need an > alloca for it: Aha, I remember this in Kaleidoscope tutorial. So, after the alloca %x can be modified freely (e.g. without adding suffix)? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-assign-a-constant-to-a-register--tp29987387p30016496.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at