search for: hjensen

On 25 May 2018 at 17:09, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:39:22 +0200 > Henry Jensen <hjensen at mailbox.org> wrote: > > > > > OK, maybe this is something which should be mentioned in the wiki. The > > reason I got to this was that I wanted to try sysvol replication. The > > wiki mentions at > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_ &...

On Fri, 25 May 2018 15:07:57 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > running "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" doesn't fix this. > > Well it wouldn't, they are both borked. > > Just do administration from Windows OK, maybe this is something which should be mentioned in the wiki. The reason I got to this was that I wanted to

On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:39:22 +0200 Henry Jensen <hjensen at mailbox.org> wrote: > > OK, maybe this is something which should be mentioned in the wiki. The > reason I got to this was that I wanted to try sysvol replication. The > wiki mentions at > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory >...

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 22:58:11 +0200 Henry Jensen <hjensen at mailbox.org> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:22:09 -0400 > schrieb Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > > > I've downloaded the Samba 4.8.2 package from the Slackware64 current > > repository. I am preparing to install the package (after a ful...

Hello, since the update to Samba 3.0.25b Clients which have offline files enabled - typically notebooks - are sporadical loosing their network drives. In the samba logs I see: "read_data: read failure for 4 bytes to client 192.168.1.58. Error = Connection timed out" After a new login the client can connect again to the shares again, but after some minutes of work the same thing

I made the observation that I'm able to make a call with my SIP client (kphone) even when I'm not registered/authenticated. Of course, when I'm not registered at asterisk, people can't call me, but it's still a huge security hole, that unregistered Clients can make calls. Is there a way to tell asterisk to only allow registered clients making calls? I know about the

On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:54:51 +0200 Henry Jensen wrote: > > Am 6. Juni 2018 19:55:52 MESZ schrieb Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I am running Samba 4.4.16 on Slackware64 14.2. I have a domain member > >Windows 7 workstation. I > >upgraded the hardware on this computer a couple of weeks ago. I deleted > >the computer from > >the domain,

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Am 24. Mai 2018 05:44:04 MESZ schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >I have an old setup that serves my purposes, but which I'll move over >to a more modern Samba4 setup at some point. I know it's old, >deprecated etc. > >In any case, at the moment I'm having a problem with two Windows 10 >machines connecting to the domain I set up.

Hello, On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:00:58 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > we successfully migrated from a Samba 3.x NT Domain to a Samba AD Domain > using Samba 4.7.x. > > However, there are still some issues and I hope for your help. > > The biggest problem so far follows: > > For historical reasons our Samba file servers carry a lot

Hi, I plan to setup an * Server with a TE10P PRI card as E1 and a BN4S0 4 Port BRI card in one box. I tried it first with the bristuff drivers from Junghanns. The BRI card worked fine alone, but as soon as I load the zaptel driver for the TE110P the BRI card says, that the port is down. So I tried it with mISDN. But it seems that this stuff is still unstable (Asterisk refuses to start at first

Hello, I have a strange problem here, we have 4 samba servers plus a PDC with samba and openldap as backend. Users are organized in groups and we give group ACLs to directories to grant access. This worked until a few weeks ago, when we upgraded from Debian Sarge to Etch. Since then samba seems to forget ACLs sometimes. This is almost not reproducible. Users who have normally access to a

Hello, We use samba 3.2.5 on Debian Lenny with LDAP backend (OpenLDAP 2.4.11). Access to files and directories are granted via ACLs. For example, we have a directory "projekt-my-test": # getfacl projekt-my-test # file: projekt-my-test/ # owner: root # group: Domain\040Admins user::rwx group::rwx group:projekt-my-test-rw:rwx mask::rwx other::--- So, I added a user to the group

Hello, I have lots of the following entries in my log: nmbd[1605]: [2010/05/28 09:59:51, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1375) nmbd[1605]: validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet: Ignoring request packet with opcode 5. What does this mean exactly? Can I ignore this? I use samba (sernet-samba) 3.3.12-25 on Debian Lenny. Thanks and Regards. Henry

Hello, since the upgrade to Debian Squeeze with Samba 3.5.6 I get lot of the following messages: [2011/11/21 11:19:55.183005, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474 (read_fd_with_timeout) [2011/11/21 11:19:55.183087, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal) read_fd_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = No route to host. What does this mean and how can I stop it? Clearly "client

Hello, we have a new branch office about 200 kilometers away from our main office. I established a connection between the two with OpenVPN. Right now a single Windows-PC is connected to our OpenVPN-Server, which acts as a bridge to our internal network. Now the other (Windows) clients - 7 units - and the employees at the branch office shall be integrated in our existing Samba Domain. What is

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:15:04 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:27 +0200 > > dc1 and dc2 have created SRV DNS records: > > > > # host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.iww.lan > > _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.iww.lan has SRV record 0 100 389 dc1.iww.lan. > > _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.iww.lan has SRV record 0 100 389

Hello, after migration from a NT style domain to Samba AD (running 4.7.8) with the classicupgrade method I have two group objects in the AD tree with german umlauts which I can't access or delete. When I try I get a error which says literally "object not found on the server". Same when using other LDAP tools. It's not a great problem, but how can I get rid of this two group

Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set

Hello, I've got some log entries like these on our DCs: Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] At first I thought it was about missing SPN entries, but adding these did not resolve the problem: # samba-tool