search for: highligher

Daniel M Gessel dixit: >Wouldn't Clang be a good option to generating unoptimized LLVM IR? More like broken ;-) sometimes at least. >On Nov 28, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> They are not really done by LLVM, because no optimizations are done >> on the >> LLVM IR. They are done by llvm-gcc, a front-end to LLVM: llvm-pcc, anyone? :þ //mirabilos --

Wouldn't Clang be a good option to generating unoptimized LLVM IR? Dan On Nov 28, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> It matters if the optimisations the students have to implement are >> the >> optimisations done implicitly by LLVM. > > They are not really done by LLVM, because no optimizations are done > on the > LLVM IR. They are done by llvm-gcc,

Tanya M. Lattner dixit: >LLVMers, > >The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: >http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ Is it correct that there is no matching clang distfile? A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. (But then, maybe it’d be best anyway if I port llvm-current to MirBSD, because it’ll be easier

I''ve recently begun testing some of the scriptaculous functionality in IE 5.5, since my company wants me to support as many browsers as possible. When I do an Effect.Highlight on a <tr>, it doesn''t quite work right. I''ve figured out a few things, but I''m not sure whether you want to change them or not. Here''s what I know: In

Hello, I’m trying the following thing: • build and install llvm with mgcc (system compiler) • build and install llvm-gcc with mgcc • build llvm with llvm-gcc • deinstall llvm(old), install llvm(new) • build llvm-gcc with llvm-gcc(old) • deinstall llvm-gcc(old), install llvm-gcc(new) However, I have the problem that the llvm-gcc(new) does not work: after it is compiled, it tries to build libgcc2

Samba version 2.2.3a doesn't seem to work with the "cupsaddsmb" program available in CUPS... cupsaddsmb merely runs a few rpcclient commands. The verbose output from cupsaddsmb is printed below. This output is from cups version 1.1.14, but I received the same error from version 1.1.12. On 2 different computers - both clean installs. When run on Samba version 2.2.2, the command

LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the

Anton Korobeynikov dixit: >> Any suggestions? >Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct >way of building clang. Oh, I did. I took LLVM and Clang from the very same SVN revision even, placed clang in llvm/tools/ and built. This has worked on GNU/Linux for me once, but clang-current seems to rely on things not yet in llvm. Like I said, I’m using r58565 for

Hello, llvm-config contains: | my $LLVM_SRC_ROOT = q{/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58935-0/llvm}; | my $LLVM_OBJ_ROOT = q{/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58935-0/llvm}; However, these paths are temporary and do not exist after compilation. llvm-gcc is fine to pick up the installed copy of llvm; how do I go if I want the installed copy to no longer contain build/fake-install paths? gccas

Dixi quod… >Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now). Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works. I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh – http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then). Now up to llvm-gcc *sigh*… //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too

On Nov 11, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Luke K. Dalessandro wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Peter Shugalev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >>>> I thought llvm-gcc isn't meant to compile for specific target (at >>>> least >>>> with -emit-llvm flag I'm using). >>> No, it is not. C language is highly target-specific,

Hi, On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Edd Barrett <vext01 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: >> 3.3 has been unsupported since late 2005 .... > > Its still the default compiler for OpenBSD, although 4.x is available > as a third party package. I will try this. Build works with gcc-4.2. Some

llvm-gcc bits are but a small part of it. You need to add a new target to llvm. Please read llvm documentation and llvmdev archieve for more information. Evan On Nov 2, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hello, > > how would I go porting llvm-gcc-4.2 to an “unknown” platform, i.e. > MirBSD? For regular gcc, I’d have to add stuff to gcc/gcc/config/ > and patch quite

...xxxxxxx in: function.yyyyyy(zzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzz, ...)" The function should truncate the error message, find how many parenthesis and brackets are open in the remaining part, substract the number of closing parenthesis and brackets, and add that many parenthesis at the end. (Xemacs parentheses highligher regards "(" and "[" as equivalent) Mayeul KAUFFMANN Univ. Pierre Mendes France Grenoble - France

Can you bootstrap llvm-gcc (configure with --enable-bootstrap)? Ciao, Duncan.

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Peter Stuge wrote: > is GPL-licensed, so a derivative of that can't be integrated into OpenSSH. A derivative of it, that exposes a general API to do tap-device-like things using stdio and command line options, could be called over its general API from OpenSSH though. Even be developed separately (this would, in fact, even help). bye, //mirabilos -- ?MyISAM tables

Duncan Sands dixit: >Can you bootstrap llvm-gcc (configure with --enable-bootstrap)? Nope, probably because it uses the host C++ compiler instead of the one built in stage1 during stage2: /usr/ports/lang/llvm-gcc/w-llvm-gcc4.2-58935-1/llvm-gcc4.2/host-i386-ecce-mirbsd10/prev-gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ports/lang/llvm-gcc/w-llvm-gcc4.2-58935-1/llvm-gcc4.2/host-i386-ecce-mirbsd10/prev-gcc/

On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Peter Shugalev wrote: > Hi, > > Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >>> I thought llvm-gcc isn't meant to compile for specific target (at least >>> with -emit-llvm flag I'm using). >> No, it is not. C language is highly target-specific, thus LLVM IR >> obtained from such sources also has the same nice 'property' > > I can see

Deare R users I am new to R. What I want to do is explained below;- I have table called States.Prob which is given below Prob of States Changes State1 State2 State3 State4 A Pa1 Pa2 Pa3 Pa4 B Pb1 Pb2 Pb3 Pb4 C Pc1 Pc2 Pc3 Pc4 D Pd1 Pd2 Pd3 Pd4 and I have a dataframe called

Hi to all, I initiate in R - Linux and I've some problems to find an editor with R interface as like RWinEdt for WinEdt. Anyone know one? Thanks in advance for your kind cooperation. Best regards Atenciosamente Ana Patricia Martins ------------------------------------------- Serviço Métodos Estatísticos Departamento de Metodologia Estatística Telef: 218 426 100 - Ext: 3210