search for: hierarci

Hi I try to configure a samba file server and create a file hierarcy for clients to view folders. What i try to do is as below: I wanted to create a folder x with no password and other folders w,y,z inside folder x with password. So users can enter and view x folder content but cant view w,y,z folder contents without password. But my clients that connect to samba server cant view a folder

Hello to you all, I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval. The data is presently not that large (a few gigabytes), but it is expected to grow rapidly. Up to this stage the data has been containedin a Microsoft

Hi all, my dovecot version is 2.2.13, quite standard configuration. Can I add directive LAYOUT=fs in dovecot configuration without losing all my archived messages? This should modify the separator of email folders from dots to slashes, correct? BR Stefano

Hello Aki, Thank you greatly for your advice, it is really valuable to know that the key criteria for our desired application of Dovecot are supported (our groupware stacks are running Dovecot 2.3.4.1) prior to commencing operations to configure Dovecot and migrate enterprise data. Thanks for the word of caution with regards to mbox format; that was a slip of the tongue on my part, our groupware

Am 27.06.2019 um 07:35 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > > On 26.6.2019 22.12, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote: >> Hello to you all, >> >> I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data?rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval.

Hello to you all, I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval. The data is presently not that large (a few gigabytes), but it is expected to grow rapidly. Up to this stage the data has been containedin a Microsoft

On 26.6.2019 22.12, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote: > Hello to you all, > > I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data?rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval. > > The data is presently not that large (a few gigabytes), but it is

> On 28/06/2020 20:19 Stefano Gatto - Fly2Net sas <gatto at fly2net.it> wrote: > > > Hi all, > my dovecot version is 2.2.13, quite standard configuration. Can I add > directive LAYOUT=fs in dovecot configuration without losing all my > archived messages? This should modify the separator of email folders > from dots to slashes, correct? > > BR > Stefano

> Also you may run into client limits.... i ve seen this with outlook, > apple mail, thunderbird via imap in the past Thanks for this note Robert, it was not really an aspect that I was considering. We are operating our groupware services user access through both Evolution Groupware and KDE Kontact / KMail on Debian Linux workstations. Hopefully if there is a client issue it should be

If you change layout to FS you are basically required to migrate users to it. You cannot change layout "on the fly". Aki On 27.6.2019 13.42, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote: > Hello Aki, > > Thank you greatly for your advice, it is really valuable to know that > the key criteria for our desired application of Dovecot are > supported (our groupware stacks are running

Is any proven routine to migrate mailboxes from mUTF-7 to UTF-8 encoding? I've try to use doveadm list/mutf7/rename but have been stuck with nested inboxes. Say I have the next structure: INBOX INBOX.??? INBOX.???.??? encoded for FS respectively as .INBOX .INBOX.&BDYESwRA- .INBOX.&BDYESwRA-.&BE8ENARK- ?When I've try to rename ?INBOX.??? with doveadm mailbox rename -u me

Dear List, This is my first post, and I'm a relatively new R user trying to work out a mixed effects model using lme() with random effects, and a correlation structure, and have looked over the archives, & R help on lme, corClasses, & etc extensively for clues. My programming experience is minimal (1 semester of C). My mentor, who has much more programming experience, but a comparable

Dovecot Team, I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical. System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systemsDovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1 doveadm-sync -1/general 1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination directories are the same 2) The -n / -N flags do not work, and a

Hi all, The guidance provided so far has been really helpful, and has helped a great deal to bringing down wasted energy on finding and executing a viable path. I am now at the final due action to complete our Dovecot application to our use-case, but am stuck on an issue that I cannot find any easily accessible documentation on. Generally this is what has been done: 1. Uploaded the enterprise

Dovecot Team, I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical. System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systems Dovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1 doveadm-sync -1/general 1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination directories are the same 2) The -n / -N flags do not work,

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Hi! </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Thank you for reporting these. We will look into them. In the mean time, can you see if any of these are fixed in 2.3.6? </div> <div> <br> </div>

Your report is most appreciated, though it lacked quite a lot of detail that could've expedited the investigation why it happened. With the further information we can hopefully figure out why you are experiencing the problems you reported. There is no offense intended. Aki On 10.7.2019 14.01, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote: > Hello Timo, > > I have scheduled some time to carry

Hello Timo, I have scheduled some time to carry through the test requested by Aki. I will add responding to you as part of that process. Not sure if I have said or done anything to offend you, as your tone appears quite abrasive, even where you do not have an actual response to an observation. It is my view that it is a privilege to provide an open source platform, and therefore a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4764 Summary: Wrong include/exclude descriptions Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: tps@vr-web.de QAContact: