search for: hierarcy

Hi I try to configure a samba file server and create a file hierarcy for clients to view folders. What i try to do is as below: I wanted to create a folder x with no password and other folders w,y,z inside folder x with password. So users can enter and view x folder content but cant view w,y,z folder contents without password. But my clients that connect to samba se...

...ST and the most active components stored inonline Exchange mailboxes. I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. Best regards, Arnold Opio OreeChief Executive OfficerParallax Digital Technologies arnoldoree at parallaxdt.com http://www.parallaxdt.com tel : +44 (0) 333 577 8587fax : +44 (0) 20 8711 2477 Parallax Digital Technologies78A Hatfeild MeadLo...

Hi all, my dovecot version is 2.2.13, quite standard configuration. Can I add directive LAYOUT=fs in dovecot configuration without losing all my archived messages? This should modify the separator of email folders from dots to slashes, correct? BR Stefano

...s stored in > online Exchange mailboxes. > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the > mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main > concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a > large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > Best regards, > > Arnold Opio Oree > Hi! Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting factor is that the total name may not exceed 4096 bytes. Also individual folder names may not e...

...nents stored in >> online Exchange mailboxes. >> >> I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. >> >> I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Arnold Opio Oree >> > > Hi! > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting > factor is that the total name may not exceed 4...

...ST and the most active components stored inonline Exchange mailboxes. I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. Best regards, Arnold Opio OreeChief Executive OfficerParallax Digital Technologies arnoldoree at parallaxdt.com http://www.parallaxdt.com tel : +44 (0) 333 577 8587fax : +44 (0) 20 8711 2477 Parallax Digital Technologies78A Hatfeild MeadLo...

...active components stored in > online Exchange mailboxes. > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > Best regards, > > Arnold Opio Oree > Hi! Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting factor is that the total name may not exceed 4096 bytes. Also individual folder names may not excee...

...losing all my > archived messages? This should modify the separator of email folders > from dots to slashes, correct? > > BR > Stefano Uh no. LAYOUT=FS changes the *physical* layout of your mails, which means it will not find your mail anymore. If you want to change the logical hierarcy separator, use namespace { separator = / } Aki

...xchange mailboxes. > > > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the > > mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main > > concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a > > large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Arnold Opio Oree > > > > Hi! > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting > factor is that the total name may n...

...line Exchange mailboxes. >> >> I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the >> mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main >> concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a >> large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. >> >> I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Arnold Opio Oree >> > Hi! > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting > factor is that the total name may not exceed 4096 byt...

Is any proven routine to migrate mailboxes from mUTF-7 to UTF-8 encoding? I've try to use doveadm list/mutf7/rename but have been stuck with nested inboxes. Say I have the next structure: INBOX INBOX.??? INBOX.???.??? encoded for FS respectively as .INBOX .INBOX.&BDYESwRA- .INBOX.&BDYESwRA-.&BE8ENARK- ?When I've try to rename ?INBOX.??? with doveadm mailbox rename -u me

...on lme, corClasses, & etc extensively for clues. My programming experience is minimal (1 semester of C). My mentor, who has much more programming experience, but a comparable level of knowledge of R, has been stumped. What follows are 3 questions pertaining to an lme() model, one on the nested hierarcy, 1 on a strategy for a piecewise approach to the variance given I have ~24 hours of data (sampled at 32Hz, 1hr per subject), and one on the corStruct or how to get rid of serial dependencies before lme(). I'm analyzing skin temperature continuously recorded at 32Hz in Baseline (10 min), Testin...

...xchange mailboxes. > > > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the > > mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main > > concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a > > large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Arnold Opio Oree > > > > Hi! > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting > factor is that the total name may n...

...red inonline Exchange mailboxes. > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also > > themitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My > > mainconcern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well > > with alarge number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > Best regards, > > Arnold Opio Oree > > Hi! > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only > limitingfactor is that the total name may not exceed 4096 bytes. > Alsoindividualfolder nam...

...xchange mailboxes. > > > > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the > > mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main > > concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a > > large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Arnold Opio Oree > > > > Hi! > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the only limiting > factor is that the total name may n...

...also the </div> <div> mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main </div> <div> concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with a </div> <div> large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Best regards, </div> <div>...

...; I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the >>>> mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main >>>> concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with >>>> a >>>> large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. >>>> >>>> I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Arnold Opio Oree >>>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder dep...

...> > I have some understanding of the fs mbox format, and also the > > > mitigations to be made for certain characters / strings. My main > > > concern is whether Dovecot is likely to be able to cope well with > > > a > > > large number of folders / depth of hierarcy. > > > > > > I will really appreciate any help / advice you can give. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Arnold Opio Oree > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > Dovecot 2.2.34/2.3 supports unlimited folder depth, the...

...he directory i386 if this is at transfer-root, but should have had created any directory named i386, since '**/' is stated to match any directory, regardless of deep. Trying: + **/i386 + **/i386/* - * Only transfers i386-directory and included files, directories named i386 deep inside the hierarcy are not recognized. In short: the matching algorithm described in the rsync documentation is not the one implemented! It is badly broken and nearly unusable, since you will have to experiment what might be matched and what not. All tests done using: rsync -avvP -n --exclude-from=exclude.lst rsy...