Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "heratbleed".
Did you mean:
heartbleed
2015 Jan 12
2
Design changes are done in Fedora
...ldn't even point to something that would
>> constitute big flop RedHat of then. One only criticizes something while
>> one cares about it ;-)
>
> Heartbleed was pretty scary, no? I'd consider that at least as bad as
> the predictable number generator issue.
>
Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems (not
only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD boxes
were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
these were not flops of particular distribution, so whichever system you
decided to stick with...
2015 Jan 12
4
Design changes are done in Fedora
...; constitute big flop RedHat of then. One only criticizes something
>>>> while
>>>> one cares about it ;-)
>>> Heartbleed was pretty scary, no? I'd consider that at least as bad as
>>> the predictable number generator issue.
>>>
>> Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems
>> (not
>> only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD
>> boxes
>> were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
>> these were not flops of particular distribution, s...
2015 Jan 12
1
Design changes are done in Fedora
...dHat of then. One only criticizes something
>>>>> while
>>>>> one cares about it ;-)
>>>> Heartbleed was pretty scary, no? I'd consider that at least as bad as
>>>> the predictable number generator issue.
>>>>
>>> Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems
>>> (not
>>> only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD
>>> boxes
>>> were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
>>> these were not flops of partic...
2015 Jan 12
0
Design changes are done in Fedora
...t to something that would
>>> constitute big flop RedHat of then. One only criticizes something while
>>> one cares about it ;-)
>> Heartbleed was pretty scary, no? I'd consider that at least as bad as
>> the predictable number generator issue.
>>
> Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems (not
> only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD boxes
> were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
> these were not flops of particular distribution, so whichever system you
> de...
2015 Jan 12
0
Design changes are done in Fedora
...riticizes something
>>>>>> while
>>>>>> one cares about it ;-)
>>>>> Heartbleed was pretty scary, no? I'd consider that at least as bad as
>>>>> the predictable number generator issue.
>>>>>
>>>> Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems
>>>> (not
>>>> only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD
>>>> boxes
>>>> were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
>>>> these were...
2015 Jan 12
2
Design changes are done in Fedora
On Sun, January 11, 2015 5:16 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2015-01-11, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed. Or another system altogether (sihg). I'm just extending your
>> thought half a step farther ;-)
>
> Or going even farther, if you like CentOS but not systemd, do the work
> to get CentOS working without it. Unhappy Debian