search for: hda11

...234, high=13, low=16200426, sector=196487120 Jun 21 16:55:09 host1 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:0b (hda), sector 196487120 ..... The case #1, showed that /dev/hda failed in a simple way, but some stuff are not obvious: Q1: which failed partition? "dev 03:0b" looks like /dev/hda11, but no quick document explains it, /dev/hda11 is just a guess based on the follwing. -- maybe "/dev/hda11" is a better string to log if my guess is true? root at host1# ls -alF /dev/hda11 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 11 Sep 15 2003 /dev/hda11 Q2: which sector failed? looks like it is s...

...234, high=13, low=16200426, sector=196487120 Jun 21 16:55:09 host1 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:0b (hda), sector 196487120 ..... The case #1, showed that /dev/hda failed in a simple way, but some stuff are not obvious: Q1: which failed partition? "dev 03:0b" looks like /dev/hda11, but no quick document explains it, /dev/hda11 is just a guess based on the follwing. -- maybe "/dev/hda11" is a better string to log if my guess is true? root at host1# ls -alF /dev/hda11 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 11 Sep 15 2003 /dev/hda11 Q2: which sector failed? looks like it is s...

Excuse me, what did you mean by "certainly wrong: you''re ... to make real physical partition hda1 visible to the domain"? Can we use real physical partition in vbd_list? And what the "cmdline_root" should be? Thanks. Xiaofang > vbd_list = [ (''phy:hda1'',''sda1'',''w''),

...ich now is solved, I upgraded to 1.39, but now I have hit another problem (on another partition): The partition was formatted as ext3, and debugfs / dumpfs showed that the feature 'has_journal' was present (as expected). The e2fsck command gave the following: # e2fsck -B4096 -b32768 /dev/hda11 e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006) e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while checking ext3 journal for /var So it seemed like a problem in the journal, as I could not find any option to e2fsck to tell it to skip applying (and reading) the journal, I set the filesystem festu...

...ow after reboot I get: -:/ # cat /proc/mounts /dev/root / ext2 rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hda9 /opt ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda8 /usr ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda7 /home ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda3 /hda3 msdos rw 0 0 /dev/hda5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda2 /hda2 msdos rw 0 0 /dev/hda11 /hda11 ext3 rw 0 0 shmfs /dev/shm shm rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 -:/ # cat /etc/mtab /dev/hda6 / auto rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,mode=0620,gid=5 0 0 /dev/hda9 /opt ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda8 /usr ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda7 /home ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/hda3 /hda3 msd...

...PEND hda5 LABEL hda6 MENU LABEL hda6 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda6 LABEL hda7 MENU LABEL hda7 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda7 LABEL hda8 MENU LABEL hda8 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda8 LABEL hda9 MENU LABEL hda9 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda9 LABEL hda10 MENU LABEL hda10 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda10 LABEL hda11 MENU LABEL hda11 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda11 LABEL hda12 MENU LABEL hda12 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda12 LABEL hda13 MENU LABEL hda13 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda13 LABEL hda14 MENU LABEL hda14 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda14 MENU SEPARATOR LABEL hda15 MENU LABEL hda15 COM32 chain.c32 APPEND hda15...

I thought I've found three bugs on syslinux 6.03: (1) With sample config file as is, i.e. leaving commented MENU VSHIFT and MENU COLOR UNSEL but uncommented MENU COLOR SEL: A black "border" is displayed below the selected line and on its right edge. (2) Uncommenting MENU COLOR UNSEL: This effect appears also on separators and on right edge on every unselected lines. (3)

...ssage "/dev/hda1 has a loop partition layout. To use this disk for the installation of CentOS it must be initialized". When I don't allow formatting I get caught in a loop ("Is a loop partition. Initialize?"), when I allow formatting I get a partition on each of the devices (hda11 and hda21) and I would be allowed to go on with the installation, but IMHO this would defeat the purpose of the exercise So my question: - is there some error in thinking on my side? - is this a situation that the installer can't deal with? (in other words: would it work if I copied a com...

...5b# ls -alF /bin/ls -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67884 Sep 2 2002 /bin/ls* sh-2.05b# md5sum /bin/ls d55769791bd4775b10febacd92552c2f /bin/ls sh-2.05b# rpm -qf /bin/ls fileutils-4.1.9-11 sh-2.05b# sh-2.05b# df -k /0 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda11 222653644 211340252 3232 100% /0 sh-2.05b# ls -alF /0 total 211233264 drwxrwxr-t 5 root wheel 4096 Sep 17 23:35 ./ drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Sep 17 22:57 ../ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 4 May 16 19:55 .final -> ../0/ -rw-r--r-- 1 309...

Hello. Look at this: [sergey@gleam sergey]$ uname -s -m -r Linux 2.4.17 i586 [sergey@gleam sergey]$ mount | grep /home /dev/hda11 on /home type ext3 (rw) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ pwd /home/sergey [sergey@gleam sergey]$ id uid=502(sergey) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),10(wheel),13(news),512(ftpadmin),513(dos) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ stat . File: "." Size: 8192 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 Direct...

...46 83 Linux /dev/hda6 3723 4359 5116671 83 Linux /dev/hda7 4360 4996 5116671 83 Linux /dev/hda8 4997 5123 1020096 83 Linux /dev/hda9 5124 5250 1020096 83 Linux /dev/hda10 5251 5377 1020096 83 Linux /dev/hda11 5378 5604 1823346 82 Linux swap /dev/hda12 5605 5649 361431 83 Linux /dev/hda13 5650 5657 64228+ 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order ________________________________________________ We were set for the disk to mirror to an...

...0"..., 100) = 28 write(2, "rpc failed: 4\n", 14rpc failed: 4 ) = 14 close(3) = 0 exit(1) = ? mango:~ # mango:~ # mount -o tcp 192.168.1.2:/nfsroot/mango /mnt mango:~ # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/hda11 / ext2 rw,noatime 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw 0 0 shmfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 shmfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 192.168.1.2:/nfsroot/mango /mnt nfs rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,tcp,lock,addr=192.168.1.2 0 0 --...

Hi I got a strange error, happening on two of my ext3 partitions. What can be wrong? And why does e2fsck error out, instead of displaying an error message? Best regards keld fsck /dev/hda6 fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) Warning... fsck.ext3 for device /dev/hda6 exited with signal 11. also From my dmesg: <1>general protection fault: e7a8 [#3] Modules linked in:

I realize this might be one of those religious topics, but is there any good rule of thumb as to how to setup storage for a Xen domU? Without really knowing any better, I''m basically going to make a disk image of the OS and the create a ''data'' partition on my raid 5 volume for each virtual machine. This is for use at home, so in reality it probably doesn''t

...ide2... Probing IDE interface ide3... Probing IDE interface ide4... Probing IDE interface ide5... hda: max request size: 1024KiB hda: 398297088 sectors (203928 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24792/255/63, UDMA(133) hda: cache flushes supported hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 hda8 hda9 hda10 hda11 hda12 hda13 hda14 hda15 > hdc: max request size: 1024KiB hdc: 398297088 sectors (203928 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24792/255/63, UDMA(133) hdc: cache flushes supported hdc: hdc1 hdc2 hdc3 hdc4 < hdc5 hdc6 hdc7 hdc8 hdc9 hdc10 hdc11 hdc12 hdc13 hdc14 hdc15 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:10.3[...