Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "have_paths".
Did you mean:
have_paths_h
2007 May 31
3
[Bug 1243] Multiple including of paths.h on AIX 5.1 systems.
...CC| |cartmanltd at hotmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Kieron Curtis <cartmanltd at hotmail.com> 2007-05-31 17:08:35 ---
PATCH #1243: I believe this bug is due to a typo in the "includes.h"
file.
Line 52 of includes.h checks for definition of macro HAVE_PATHS when it
should in fact be checking for HAVE_PATHS_H
No-where else in the source is any reference made to the the errant
name, only the latter. Using the errant name causes the compiler to
execute the wrong order of include files and macro definitions.
Errant code in includes.h:
...
#ifdef...