search for: hartwellcorp

...AY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 load printers = no os level = 0 local master = No dns proxy = No wins server = 10.11.10.3 writeable = Yes inherit acls = Yes map to guest = Bad Uid -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+mikes=hartwellcorp.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+mikes=hartwellcorp.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael St. Laurent Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:59 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba-3.0.23 problem I've tried using the plus sign with no change. I also tried adding the...

...ing with foreign persons. Lacking such license, ITAR technical data is limited to US Legal Residents only. It is the responsibility of the organization and individual in control of this data to abide by US export laws. If you are not a US Legal Resident, immediately forward this e-mail to notify at hartwellcorp.com or reply to sender without reading any further. Take no other action with this e-mail until contacted. Notice: The information in this document and document itself, in whole or in part, in any form ("Information") is proprietary and/or confidential property of Hartwell Corporation,...

We had to power down all servers today for electrical maintenance in the building and for some reason I began having access problems related to the valid users lists when power was restored. The dialog from the 'Samba-3.0.23 broke my network' thread seemed as if it might be related even though I had not performed any software upgrade so I tried adding the group mappings as discussed in

Hi, I've got a Word document on a Samba share that I can't rename, overwrite or open. Attempting to rename it gives: Cannot rename Filename: There has been a sharing violation. Attempting to open it gives: Filename.doc is locked for editing by 'another user'. This is on a NAS box so I can't say which Samba version it is. There are no temporary files in the share to show who

...1.9.18p10) it did not. I don't remember making any relevant configuration changes during said period but have included my smb.conf file below for your consideration. Please help... is this a Samba bug or just misconfiguration!? Thanks # Samba config file created using SWAT # from ismikes.hartwellcorp.com (10.11.21.9) # Date: 2000/01/12 17:20:03 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MERCURY netbios aliases = HARTWELL interfaces = 10.11.10.1/16 10.12.10.1/16 127.0.0.1/16 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = HARTWELL-NT HARTWELL-BDC username map = /usr/local/samba...

Is there a yum repository which contains the package gtkterm for CentOS-5? -- Michael St. Laurent IT Department Hartwell Corporation -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Is there not a separate SMP kernel for multi-processor systems in CentOS-5? I don't see one in the repository. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070801/c1d05b7f/attachment-0001.html>

Does anyone know of an ACL/extended attributes enabled version of the Red Hat 9 kernel exist in RPM form? -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

I've just build 3.0.27a on a CentOS-5 system which is a respin/clone of RHEL-5. I would like to share them if someone on the team would tell me where to send them.

.... I'm just trying to add one user to the ACL list and give them modify permissions. It occured to me that the problem *might* be that I was not the owner of the file and so I corrected that situation but still got exactly the same results in the log file. Michael St. Laurent <mailto:mikes@hartwellcorp.com> wrote: > I've got ACLs enabled in the kernel now and I can add and/or remove > them using the unix command line program (setfacl/getfacl). However, > there still seems to be a problem. When I try to add an ACL type > permission to a file (through Samba) I get the following...

I posted this last week but haven't heard anything. I'm not sure if this is because nobody knows the answer (can't believe that!) or I'm missing something obvious in the documentation and people are thinking "Read The Fine Manual". Whatever the reason, if anyone has any insights into this problem I'd be very grateful for their comments. We're using Samba 3.0.23b

I see the new kernel available in the plus repository... is there some way to view what the differences are between that and the mainline kernel?

...> OK. I get backuped .tdb . > btw, I copy from backup only printing.tdb and ntdrivers.tdb, so wrong locking is not caused by old lcoking tdb. -- Wire connection and Windows reinstallation senior engineer Dmitry Melekhov http://www.belkam.com/~dm 2:5050/11.23@fidonet Return-Path: <mikes@hartwellcorp.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from guardian.hartwellcorp.com (guardian.hartwellcorp.com [209.223.127.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D305517C; Wed, 16 May 2001 00:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by guardian.hartwellcorp.com (8.11.0/8...

I'm trying to get the RHEL-5 version of their kernel driver to install with no luck so far. http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/support/scsi/u320/ASC-39320A-R/ Here is what I'm seeing when I install their provided .RPM: [root at hcnas ~]# rpm -i a320raid.rhel5.i686.rpm Adaptec adp94xx driver installer - V1.2.5934.0-1 Backing up all modified files to /boot/adp94xx-backup-4 Using GRUB

I found part of the problem... the Red Hat 9 kernel does not ship with the ACL patches installed. ;-) Does anyone know if there is a repository that hosts Red Hat kernel RPMs with the ACL patches applied? Michael St. Laurent <> wrote: > I have a newly upgraded Red Hat 9 Samba server (now ver. 3.04, > formerly ver. 2.2.7a) on which I would like to start using ACLs to > provide the

I've got ACLs enabled in the kernel now and I can add and/or remove them using the unix command line program (setfacl/getfacl). However, there still seems to be a problem. When I try to add an ACL type permission to a file (through Samba) I get the following in the log file: [2004/05/24 18:14:57, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1381) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID

Is there a problem with "username map" in version 3.0.9? It seems to be ignoring the map file on my system. I have the line: root = administrator in the file but when the administrator account tries to access the system the add user script is run for the user "administrator". -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

Samba version 3.0.10 seems to be ignoring the map file on my system. I have the line: root = administrator in the file but when the administrator account tries to access the system the add user script is run for the user "administrator". -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

Is there a simple fix for the illegal input sequence errors I'm seeing with the smb.conf man page? This is on a Redhat 9 system. Do I need to update the groff package or some such? -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

Hello the list, I'm in the process of changing over to ADS mode and turning on winbind. One problem I'm running into is that when I right click on a file in Windows and examine the security tab the names are being shown as "Unix User\10751" instead of "HCNAS\mikes" as they used to appear for example. I'm assuming this has to do with the winbind config.