Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "handlemergeinputchain".
Did you mean:
handlemergeinputchains
2014 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] How can I get rid of "OPFL_Chain" in myCPUGenInstrInfo.inc
hi Tim,guys,
it was regarding splitting 16-bit ADDC to two 8-bit ADDC+ADDE.
the 8-bit ADDE instruction is defined as:
let Constraints="$dst=$op0",mayStore=1,
hasSideEffects=0,neverHasSideEffects=1 in
def ADDErm: myInstr
<0x0,
(outs Intregs:$dst) (ins Intregs:$op0,MEMi:$op1),
"",
[set IntRegs:$dest (adde IntRegs:$op0, (load ADDRi:$op1))]
>
very unlucky, this
2012 Aug 14
2
[LLVMdev] Load serialisation during selection DAG building
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Steve Montgomery <stephen.montgomery3 at btinternet.com> wrote:
> Further to my earlier question, I'm perhaps a bit confused about memory serialisation. The following example, compiled using clang for the MSP430:
>
> target datalayout = "e-p:16:16:16-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:16:32-n8:16"
> target triple = "msp430-??-??"
>
2012 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] Load serialisation during selection DAG building
> No, a chain is supposed to mean "later than". It sounds like MSP430 is bending
> the rules here.
The instruction selector for ADD16mm is autogenerated, so, this is not
MSP430 bug alone :)
This is just the single target in the tree which has mem-mem instructions.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2014 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] How can I get rid of "OPFL_Chain" in myCPUGenInstrInfo.inc
...nt.
>
> I don't suppose you could post the output of "-view-isel-dags" &
> "-view-sched-dags"? I've got some ideas on how to reproduce what
> you're seeing, but I need the exact DAGs to have much chance.
>
> It sounds like it *might* be a bug in HandleMergeInputChains, if it
> doesn't take glue into account somehow.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Tim.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140428/74c9713c/attachment.html>