search for: handcuff

Hello all, I tried to run SH4 1.5 on my Mac (MacOS X 10.6.3 Snow Leopard) but it crashes even before the menus can be displayed because of some unimplemented D3DX call (D3DXCreateTextureFromFileExA) in D3DX9_36.dll. I used Wine version 1.2-rc2. According to the AppDB, several persons who ran it on Linux got the menus working. How is it possible that running SH4 on Linux doesn't trigger

Hi R people: I would like to learn about classes, methods, S3 and S4. Which book would be the most helpful for this info, please: the green one or the white(and blue) one? Or is there something that would be even better, please? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Laura Holt mailto: lauraholt_983 at hotmail.com R 2.1.0 Windows. trying to learn

...u accepted when you entered the store -- which says that if you enter the store you agree not to compare prices to any other store or their advertised price and doing so subjects you to prosecution under tresspassing law. So you go to claim your 10% price difference and find yourself taken away in handcuffs but find that you won't be prosecuted if you will pay the store's legal fees and not disclose the price differences. Or imagine (in the way of MS .NET license and performance comparisons) that the stores have posted licenses that you 'push door to accept' that say you won't...

I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set. Now it appears that they have changed the internal settings to prevent it from running setuid. This means that I can't define the share in fstab with "user" and connect from my Linux user account. Mounting smb/cifs shares seems to be blocked

There is a warning on the web site about expect_render and stub_render: "WARNING: expect_render and stub_render, while very useful, act differently from standard Message Expectations (a.k.a. mock expectations), which would never pass calls through to the real object. This can be very confusing when there are failures if you''re not aware of this fact, because some calls will be

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > > do that and keep

> The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > do that and keep track of things, I need to know that the vector of > pairs is

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.