search for: hakansom

Greetings, Last April, in this discussion... http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=143517 ...we never found out how (or if) the Sun 6120 (T4) array can be configured to ignore cache flush (sync-cache) requests from hosts. We''re about to reconfigure a 6120 here for use with ZFS (S10U4), and the evil tuneable zfs_nocacheflush is not going to serve us well (there is a ZFS

Greetings, We''re trying out a new JBOD here. Multipath (mpxio) is not working, and we could use some feedback and/or troubleshooting advice. The OS is oi151a7, running on an existing server with a 54TB pool of internal drives. I believe the server hardware is not relevant to the JBOD issue, although the internal drives do appear to the OS with multipath device names (despite the fact

...umos.org Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] [zfs] Re: Petabyte pool? Message-ID: <5144642B.1030900@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 03/16/2013 12:57 AM, Richard Elling wrote: > On Mar 15, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Marion Hakanson <hakansom@ohsu.edu> wrote: >> So, has anyone done this? Or come close to it? Thoughts, even if you >> haven''t done it yourself? > > Don''t forget about backups :-) > -- richard Transferring 1 PB over a 10 gigabit link will take at least 10 days when overhead is t...

I''m running Postgresql (v8.1.10) on Solaris 10 (Sparc) from within a non-global zone. I originally had the database "storage" in the non-global zone (e.g. /var/local/pgsql/data on a UFS filesystem) and was getting performance of "X" (e.g. from a TPC-like application: http://www.tpc.org). I then wanted to try relocating the database storage from the zone (UFS

Greetings, In looking for inexpensive JBOD and/or RAID solutions to use with ZFS, I''ve run across the recent "VTrak" SAS/SATA systems from Promise Technologies, specifically their E-class and J-class series: E310f FC-connected RAID: http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?product_id=175 E310s SAS-connected RAID:

...> the subsequent "zpool import"? > > - Eric > > -- > Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:11:31 -0700 > From: Marion Hakanson <hakansom at ohsu.edu> > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How do I get my pool back? > To: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > Message-ID: <200709131811.l8DIBVO2007381 at kyklops.ohsu.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > peter.tribble at gmail.com said: > > # zpool cl...

While I understand everything at Oracle is "top secret" these days. Does anyone have any insight into a next-gen X4500 / X4540? Does some other Oracle / Sun partner make a comparable system that is fully supported by Oracle / Sun? http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/previous-products/index.html What do X4500 / X4540 owners use if they''d like more

miro at cybershade.us said: > So at this point this looks like an issue with the MPT driver or these SAS > cards (I tested two) when under heavy load. I put the latest firmware for the > SAS card from LSI''s web site - v1.29.00 without any changes, server still > locks. > > Any ideas, suggestions how to fix or workaround this issue? The adapter is > suppose to be

Folks, First, let me thank everyone involved for making QEMU available on the Solaris platform. It''s turning out to be really handy.... Here at work we''re required to use GroupWise calendaring (at least for the time being), and I''m trying to get a bit more organized, so thought I''d start (again) using a Palm handheld to take my calendar, etc. with me. The new

Greetings, I followed closely the thread "ZFS and Storage", and other discussions about using ZFS on hardware RAID arrays, since we are deploying ZFS in a similar situation here. I''m sure I''m oversimplifying, but the consensus for general filesystem-type storage needs, as I''ve read it, tends toward doing ZFS RAID-Z (or RAID-Z2) on LUNS consisting of hardware