search for: haegar

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce...

Hallo, As part of building a debian package for my use of tinc 1.1 I run the "make check" testsuites. The current git breaks in invite-join.test: FAIL: invite-join ================= + ../src/tinc --config=/home/haegar/tinc/tinc/test/./invite-join.test.1 --pidfile=/home/haegar/tinc/tinc/test/./invite-join.test.1/pid Generating 2048 bits keys: ...........................+++ p ....+++ q Done. Generating Ed25519 keypair: Done. Warning: could not bind to port 655. Tinc will instead listen on port 36786. + sleep 1 +...

Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Ti...

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local addres...

Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU

...ata is sent over TCP: Sending packet of 168 bytes to V (2.3.4.5 port 20316) Packet for V (2.3.4.5 port 20316) larger than minimum MTU, forwarding via H Sending packet of 308 bytes to V (2.3.4.5. port 20316) Packet for V (2.3.4.5 port 20316) larger than minimum MTU, forwarding via H c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.

On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > ------- TL;DR ------- > > > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > > How to improve? > > Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not th...

Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>

...ap interface. Also, the subnet you are using for the VPN are public addresses. You should use different subnet. Look up private address space. Dan On Jul 21, 2015 7:40 PM, "Adam Macielinski" <adam at macielinski.net<mailto:adam at macielinski.net>> wrote: Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Ti...

...the person managing the list at > tinc-owner at tinc-vpn.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tinc digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Authenticating VPN addresses: a proposal (Sven-Haegar Koch) > 2. tinc exit when there is no internet? (Heng Wang) > 3. Re: tinc exit when there is no internet? (Guus Sliepen) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> > To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org > Cc: > Date: Tue,...

...the person managing the list at > tinc-owner at tinc-vpn.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tinc digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Authenticating VPN addresses: a proposal (Sven-Haegar Koch) > 2. tinc exit when there is no internet? (Heng Wang) > 3. Re: tinc exit when there is no internet? (Guus Sliepen) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> > To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org > Cc: > Date: Tue,...

Yes, the current c implement is not so easy to read, very old style! The good part is that the protocol seems very clear:) 2016年12月13日 09:46，"Sven-Haegar Koch" <haegar at sdinet.de>写道： On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Cong Monkey wrote: > As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will > be interesting:) Possible? Sure. Will it be bigger and slower? Sure. Will Guus do it? Most likely not. Feel free to do it, but...

...hat it is always about the local_address field - essentially switching from an IP to unknown back and forth. Here unrelated node "vlad" connected to aaa_vpnhub1 and to igor, on waehring I receive for the link tokamak<->igor: Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local address 2.3.4.5 != unknown) Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local address unknown != 2.3.4.5) Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for...

------- TL;DR ------- Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). How to improve? ------- The Long Version ------- I tried to test tinc performance for an upcoming project that may need to use NFS over a VPN. Our current tinc network seems to be able to transmit at around 30-40 MB/s. (I used an 1GB random testfile to copy to/from /dev/shm/; using netcat and http.) In comparison, HTTP and

...s to be the result of commit 13f9bc1ff199bea46 "Add support for out-of-tree ("VPATH") builds." Undoing the change to configure.ac fixes the compile for me. (Though 'make check' fails in the invite-join.test, still investigating if it is something local) c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.

Hi Sven, 2008/1/25, Sven Koch <haegar at sdinet.de>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.2.1-1 > Severity: normal > > I am using a Mustec PowerMust 1000 USB, connected with a USB cable to > the PC. > > With nut 2.2.0-2.1 everything works without problems - but since the > 2.2.1-1 update the "upsdrvctl start&q...

...you > don't care about it so it's fine. If tinc detects that a node goes down, > the subnet-down script will remove the offending route, and the kernel > will then use another one. And if you manually stop a tincd its routes > will be removed as well. > > c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.

I'm writing a storage app for storing the Ed25519 pub keys and want to do some basic verification when a user submits their public key. Is it just A-Za-z0-9 ? or can it contain special chars as well? I'm assuming it will be in the range of printable characters? Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...d Digest=sha1, and would like to switch to something more secure and AES-NI optimized, but can't change all nodes at the same time, and do not want to break half the network in the middle. (And yes, I know this only affects the tinc 1.0 hosts, but they are still the majority) c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F.