search for: h3ll

...very same list when I first > started, have "cut my teeth" on learning VERY hard lessons about > certain syntax in the Terminal and what NOT to type.......only to have > that all "taken" away from me at the whim of IBM. It just seems > unfair. I'm hoping like H3LL that the developers @ Fedora are > seriously thinking about forking "Just In Case"!? I mean they could > still use the .RPM extensions, and possibly even still pull their code > from RHEL, but at least they would be autonomous and wouldn't have to > rely on IBM's g...

> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! > > Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest > supercomputer in the

...his very same list when I first > started, have "cut my teeth" on learning VERY hard lessons about > certain syntax in the Terminal and what NOT to type.......only to have > that all "taken" away from me at the whim of IBM. It just seems > unfair. I'm hoping like H3LL that the developers @ Fedora are > seriously thinking about forking "Just In Case"!? I mean they could > still use the .RPM extensions, and possibly even still pull their code > from RHEL, but at least they would be autonomous and wouldn't have to > rely on IBM's good...

...th ridicule on this very same list when I first started, have "cut my teeth" on learning VERY hard lessons about certain syntax in the Terminal and what NOT to type.......only to have that all "taken" away from me at the whim of IBM. It just seems unfair. I'm hoping like H3LL that the developers @ Fedora are seriously thinking about forking "Just In Case"!? I mean they could still use the .RPM extensions, and possibly even still pull their code from RHEL, but at least they would be autonomous and wouldn't have to rely on IBM's good will in order to...

Bloody H3ll... I replied only to the person who sent it. Hey, maybe this list could stick a Reply-To field to the incoming messages before broadcasting them? Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote: > Andrew J Miles wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > We've just started using MS Visual C++,...

...etails. ************************************************************************* -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD9BXDyno7/PXAzAcRAh+OAJwIOpuuuWmBT//tvEfWUCkXxv/j3ACeIWw2 zjC4tHx+fqNuopVYBf8pBXU= =h3Ll -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...hen I first >> started, have "cut my teeth" on learning VERY hard lessons about >> certain syntax in the Terminal and what NOT to type.......only to >> have that all "taken" away from me at the whim of IBM. It just seems >> unfair. I'm hoping like H3LL that the developers @ Fedora are >> seriously thinking about forking "Just In Case"!? I mean they could >> still use the .RPM extensions, and possibly even still pull their >> code from RHEL, but at least they would be autonomous and wouldn't >> have to rel...

...st when I first >> started, have "cut my teeth" on learning VERY hard lessons about >> certain syntax in the Terminal and what NOT to type.......only to have >> that all "taken" away from me at the whim of IBM. It just seems >> unfair. I'm hoping like H3LL that the developers @ Fedora are >> seriously thinking about forking "Just In Case"!? I mean they could >> still use the .RPM extensions, and possibly even still pull their code >> from RHEL, but at least they would be autonomous and wouldn't have to >> rely on...