search for: gui_application

...v/gui.c > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg, > *cancel_button; > > /* The entry point from the main program. > - * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main(). > + * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main_(). > */ > void > gui_application (struct config *config) Maybe it would be better to just remove () from the commit; after all, earlier in that comment gtk_init has no () either. -- Pino Toscano

...100644 --- a/p2v/gui.c +++ b/p2v/gui.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg, *cancel_button, *reboot_button; /* The entry point from the main program. - * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main(). + * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main. */ void gui_application (struct config *config) -- 2.1.0

...07d..2df5017 100644 --- a/p2v/gui.c +++ b/p2v/gui.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg, *cancel_button; /* The entry point from the main program. - * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main(). + * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main_(). */ void gui_application (struct config *config) -- 1.9.3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167921

Hi Rich, This series includes patches to make `make syntax-check` pass. Some of the fix require change to maint.mk, but the file is not in git repo. Is it intended? Thanks! Hu Tao (13): syntax-check: dirty hack to pass bindtextdomain check syntax-check: fix error_message_period check syntax-check: fix makefile_at_at_check syntax-check: fix prohibit_assert_without_use check