search for: gtn

...Version: 7.7 (2012.06) Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: stefano.biagiotti at gtn.it QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Created attachment 138676 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=138676&action=edit journalctl -k -b -1 --no-pager --no-hostname On my Fedora 27 system, display often freezes unpredictably. Mouse and keyboard don't work, but...

...or > method is used)" which I don't understand. Where >= or > is used by what, and where? I understand why the first two are FALSE (1 item of anything must be sorted). I don't understand the 3rd and 4th cases where length is 2: do_isunsorted seems to call lang3(install(".gtn"), x, CADR(args))). Does that fall back to TRUE for some reason? Matthew > sessionInfo() R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30) Platform: x86_64-pc-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United Kingdom.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United Kingdom.1252 [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United Kingdom....

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105687 Bug ID: 105687 Summary: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000ca0 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi, In the man page for is.unsorted(): Value: A length-one logical value. All objects of length 0 or 1 are sorted: the result will be ?NA? for objects of length 2 or more except for atomic vectors and objects with a class (where the ?>=? or ?>? method is used to compare ?x[i]? with ?x[i-1]? for ?i? in ?2:length(x)?). This contains many incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105174 Bug ID: 105174 Summary: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

...e with caution, # standard disclaimers apply. :) # # The following individuals contributed many of rules in this # distribution. # # Credits: # Ron Gula <rgula@securitywizards.com> of Network Security Wizards # Max Vision <vision@whitehats.com> # Martin Markgraf <martin@mail.du.gtn.com> # Fyodor Yarochkin <fygrave@tigerteam.net> # Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com> # Jim Forster <jforster@rapidnet.com> # Scott McIntyre <scott@whoi.edu> # Tom Vandepoel <Tom.Vandepoel@ubizen.com> # Brian Caswell <bmc@snort.org> # Zeno <admin...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110572 Bug ID: 110572 Summary: System Crash: nouveau 0000:08:00.0: gr: PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail and nouveau 0000:08:00.0: mmu: ce0 mmu invalidate timeout Product: Mesa Version: 19.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All)