search for: group3

...-18.9843 -4.1129 0.3816 6.0047 18.1858 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -3.4274 0.4641 -7.386 1.10e-12 *** capacity 0.9931 0.1281 7.754 9.55e-14 *** group2 0.7242 0.6337 1.143 0.25392 group3 2.0264 0.6168 3.286 0.00112 ** capacity:group2 -0.1523 0.1764 -0.863 0.38864 capacity:group3 -0.3885 0.1742 -2.231 0.02633 * --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 (Dispersion parameter for...

...Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 12.6487 0.4037 31.331 2.58e-11 *** FEATURE4227 -0.3271 0.4944 -0.661 0.52325 FEATURE6374 -1.0743 0.4944 -2.173 0.05492 . GROUP1 -1.2641 0.5709 -2.214 0.05120 . GROUP2 -0.2359 0.5709 -0.413 0.68825 GROUP3 -1.3081 0.5709 -2.291 0.04492 * GROUP4 -0.5867 0.5709 -1.028 0.32836 FEATURE4227:GROUP1 1.5651 0.6993 2.238 0.04915 * FEATURE6374:GROUP1 1.1435 0.6993 1.635 0.13302 FEATURE4227:GROUP2 0.4372 0.6993 0.625 0.54577 FEATURE6374:GROUP2 0...

...vfs objects = glusterfs glusterfs:volume = vol glusterfs:logfile = /var/log/samba/glusterfs-vol.log glusterfs:loglevel = 7 path = /toplevel public = no writable = yes guest ok = no valid users = @"group1",@"group2",@"group3" kernel share modes = no *Question 1:* *Are there any performance concerns with the above settings in the smb.conf?* The ACL's on /toplevel are: # getfacl toplevel # file: toplevel # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x group:group1:rwx group:group2:r-- group:group3:r...

Hi everyone, I have a problem using rpart (R 2.0.1 under Unix) Indeed, I have a large matrix (9271x7), my response variable is numeric and all my predictor variables are categorical (from 3 to 8 levels). Here is an example : > mydata[1:5,] distance group3 group4 group5 group6 group7 group8 pos_1 0.141836040224967 a c e a g g pos_501 0.153605961621317 a a a a g g pos_1001 0.152246705384699 a c e a g g pos_1501 0.145563737522463 a c e a...

...1 2.890875 5 b group1 3.853280 6 b group1 4.113585 7 b group1 3.043250 8 b group1 3.800920 9 c group1 5.394305 10 c group1 5.004290 11 c group1 4.651435 12 c group1 4.286650 13 d group1 4.773440 14 d group1 3.982200 15 d group1 5.718690 16 d group1 4.803815 ..... 45 d group3 8.021240 46 d group3 7.641685 47 d group3 7.519445 48 d group3 9.514580 then: >tapply(val,list(group,sub),mean) a b c d group1 3.506216 3.702759 4.834170 4.819536 group2 4.831503 5.246833 5.930116 6.649191 group3 6.233062 6.648325 7.787651 8.174238 &gt...

...tions (VarCorr(m1)@reSumry$group1) but I was not able to find a way to extract the other components individually. To extract the Residuals I tried: (ranef(m1)@ stdErr) which unfortunately did not work. Thank you very much for your help! Thomas My model: > m1<- lmer(y ~ trtt + (trtt-1|group3) + (trtt-1|group2) + (trtt-1|group1), d1) > m1 Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML Formula: y ~ trtt + (trtt - 1 | group3) + (trtt - 1 | group2) + (trtt - 1 | group1) Data: d1 AIC BIC logLik MLdeviance REMLdeviance 1819.454 2003.915 -874.7269 1736.421 1749....

Dear list, I would like to do some calculation using different grouping variables. My 'df' looks like this: # Some data set.seed(345) id <- seq(200,400, by=10) ids <- sample(substr(id,1,1)) group1 <- rep(1:3, each=7) group2 <- rep(1:2, c(10,11)) group3 <- rep(1:4, c(5,5,5,6)) df <- data.frame(id, ids, group1, group2, group3) df <- rbind(df, df, df) df$time <- seq(2009, 2011, each=3) df$x1 <- sample(0:100, 63) df$x2 <- sample(44:234, 63) head(df) ## For group1 d1 <- aggregate(cbind(x1, x2) ~ group1 + i...

Hi, I just get a question (sorry if it is a dumb one) and I "phase" my question in the following R codes: group1<-rnorm(n=50, mean=0, sd=1) group2<-rnorm(n=20, mean=1, sd=1.5) group3<-c(group1,group2) Now, if I am given a dataset from group3, what method (discriminant analysis, clustering, maybe) is the best to cluster them by using R. The known info includes: 2 clusters, normal distribution (but the parameters are unknown). Thanks, Ed

Hi all, I'm on FreeBSD11 and I install samba36. I have some users and groups. user1, user2 -> group1 user3->group3 user4,user5->group4 I have a share: /extra/samba-test Access to the share is : user1->writable user4->readable group4->writable group3->writable My config file is: [samba-share] comment= aa path= /extra/samba-test public= no browsable= yes writable=no write list=@group4 @group3...

...group1 <- c(rep("A1", 40), rep("A2", 40)) group2 <-rep(c(rep("C1", 5), rep("C2", 5), rep("C3", 5), rep("C4", 5), rep("C5", 5), rep("C6", 5), rep("C7", 5), rep("C8", 5)),2) num <- rnorm(80) group3 <- rep(seq(0,4,1),16) data <- data.frame(group1, group2, num, group3) levelplot(num ~ as.factor(group3) * group2|group1, data=data,col.regions=rev(heat.colors(25)), colorkey=list(space="right"), region=T, layout=c(1,2), scales=list(y=list(alternating=c(1,1,1))))...

Dear all, First, let's create some data to play around: set.seed(1) (df <- data.frame(Group=rep(c("Group1","Group2","Group3"), each=10), Value=c(rexp(10, 1), rexp(10, 4), rexp(10, 10)))[sample(1:30,30),]) ## Now we need the empirical distribution function: edf <- function(x) ecdf(x)(x) # empirical distribution function evaluated at x ## The big question is how one can apply the empirical dist...

Yes: # getent group GROUP group:x:17573: # getent group group2 group2:x:11010: # getent group GROUP3 group3:x:21178: # wbinfo --group-info GROUP group:x:17573: # wbinfo -n GROUP S-1-5-21-948789634-15155995-928725530-7573 SID_DOM_GROUP (2)

...A group1 10 Nov 24 17:25 . owner@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:fd-----:allow group@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:fd-----:allow group:group2:rwxpdDaARWcCos:fd-----:allow ... the file gets properly created with these permissions (because the user's primary group is group3) -rwxrwx---+ 1 userA group3 79258 Nov 24 17:26 f.xlsx owner@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:-------:allow group@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:-------:allow group:group2:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow now userB can overwrite the file and we get the following ACL: ----rwx--...

I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is allowed: -r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it

If I have 3 groups,and for each group,I get the ratio(e.g. incidence rate). Now I wanna compare 3 ratio pairwise,and get the corresponding p values,i.e: group1 vs group2 ,p value=? group1 vs group3 ,p value=? group2 vs group3 ,p value=? Which statistical test should be used? Thanks a lot for your help. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ntercept) 42.977 6.5557 Residual 26.845 5.1813 number of obs: 360, groups: subject, 90 Fixed effects: Estimate Std. Error t value (Intercept) -3.8628 1.2701 -3.041 capacity 1.1219 0.1176 9.542 group2 0.9086 1.7905 0.507 group3 2.3700 1.7936 1.321 capacity:group2 -0.1745 0.1610 -1.083 capacity:group3 -0.3807 0.1622 -2.348 Correlation of Fixed Effects: (Intr) capcty group2 group3 cpct:2 capacity -0.322 group2 -0.709 0.228 gr...

Dear List, I am looking to perform exploratory analyses of two (relatively) large datasets of categorical data. The first one is a binary 80x100 matrix, in the form: matrix(sample(c(0,1),25,replace=TRUE), nrow = 5, ncol=5, dimnames = list(c( "group1", "group2","group3", "group4","group5"), c("V.1", "V.2", "V.3", "V.4", "V.5"))) and the second one is a multistate 750x1500 matrix, with up to 15 *unordered* states per variable, in the form: matrix(sample(c(1:15),25,replace=TRUE), nrow =...

...m deploying NUT in a data center and I'm curious to know how others have gone about staging the shutdown of various systems. The systems are broken down into groups of importance, group1 being the most important group4 being the least. In the event of an outage take down group4 after 5 minutes, group3 after 10 minutes, group2 after 15, and finally group4 after 20. I've only been using NUT for a few days but I'm assuming I can accomplish this with a combination multiple systems, upssched events. Thanks! -- Later, Darin

...ipts directory) http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/new/ifmember-o.asp Then the script is: @echo off ifmember "DOMAIN\group1" if not errorlevel 1 goto group2 net use r: \\SERVER\group1files :group2 ifmember "DOMAIN\group2" if not errorlevel 1 goto group3 net use s: \\SERVER\group2files :group3 .... So according toi group the network drives get mapped. It's all in one login script and makes things easy! I couldn't find this in the archives so I thought I'd share this. What's nice is that you have the ifmember only on the serve...

...into 3 groups that have slightly different needs (minor mods in a couple of files). So ideally I would have 4 directories: /path/to/sync/common/ <- common files /path/to/sync/group1/ <- group1 specific only /path/to/sync/group2/ <- group2 specific only /path/to/sync/group3/ <- group3 specific only Then I'd run an rsync like: rsync -av --overlay /path/to/sync/groupN \ /path/to/sync/common remotehost: Thinking in terms of a list of files to be transferred, I would like: - Anything present in common/ added to the file list; then - Anything present in...