search for: gritti

Almost done with my centos handbook project on my server. Last two things are related, backups. Looking for anyone who feels like chiming in on mysql backups...this is what I am thinking at this point. Mysql backup system for all websites ---------------------------------------------------- Each website is on a separate server, each running mysql, no site is related to the others. A server

Howdy, It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is incomplete. The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000 http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b I could dive in an make the changes *I* think need to happen but I'd like to talk to people

So I'm sure many of you are using or have tried to use TrixBox. Thus far, I'm in love with it. I haven't had a single snag. Then again, I don't need to get into anything overly nitty gritty with my Asterisk box. What are your views? -- Want a free copy of "TrixBox Made Easy"? Read the contest rules

hi all just a quick question i have dovecot (0.99.14 yum install) running on my fc4 server to get this working, i had to downgrade from mysql 5 to fedora's mysql rpm's i really would prefer to use mysql 5, but to satisfy the dependencies, i had to go to mysql 4 now, i just want to know if there is an rpm (linux rather than specific fc4 version is fine) out there for dovecot, that i

Hi All, here comes the patch for the second wave of Use class size reduction. I have included all the machinery that is needed, and it is *active*. The User* inside of Use is even sometimes NULL, but the algorithm is able to recover it. If there is a non-null User* present, then I am asserting that it equals the computed value. I did not receive feedback for the algorithmic part yet, so I

As is often the case when I tackle a new platform/language, I get the big picture very quickly (because frameworks are frameworks are frameworks) but its the nitty-gritty of the language that bogs me down... So I have some similar methods on a few of my model classes that I wanted to push into a helper. Now I reckoned that the Ruby way was to create a module and mix it in with include. However, I

On Wednesday 24 September 2008 02:10, Evan Cheng wrote: > > I wrote a pattern that looks something like the above in form, but how > > do I tell the selection DAG to prefer my pattern over another that > > already exists. I can't easily just disable that other pattern > > because > > it generates Machine Instruction opcode enums that are assumed to be > >

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details of > > debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). > > > > This applies to LTO as

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote: > >> Hi Chris, > > > Hi! I'm CC'ing the llvmdev list for the benefit of others. > >> Since I see you're very involved in LLVM, I need a little guidance on >> getting from C to MACH-SUIF. >> >> I've been given the task of using LLVM to translate C code to another

So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details of debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). This applies to LTO as well, so I won't single out ThinLTO here. 1) Multiple CUs in a .dwo file Clang/LLVM produces a CU for each original source file - these CUs are kept through IR linking (thin or full) and produced as distinct CUs in the resulting

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > Maybe it can follow the "Delete dead loops" pass which is after > Induction Variable Simplification pass, so it will not affect existing > exitvalue rewriting optimization in Induction Variable Simplification > to find out and delete dead loops? > > Existing pass pipeline: >

Hi, Is there any performance difference between rendering partials vs. calling a helper? When we initally started coding we built a bunch of small partials and if there is a significant performance overhead with them, we''ll probably try to switch them over to helpers. They seem like they would be quite similar but I don''t know the full details of how partials are handled.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote: >> Can you say a little bit about MACH-SUIF? With a brief google search, I >> didn't turn up anything that described the architecture. Is it a RISC-like >> machine with 32-bit instruction words? >> > > It's another VM representation. I haven't really gotten to know the nitty > gritty of the language so

Hello security folks I (not so) recently asked for volunteers to the security documentation project. I got delightfully large number of volunteers! Thank you! Right now I have some personal (medical) issues to deal with, and I'll be out of town for the next 2 weeks. When I get back, we can move ahead at top speed. The project will have 3 parts. FAQ: This will cover any kind of basic

On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:15 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> 1. Treat these instructions as cross register class copies. The src >> and dst classes are different (VR128 and FR32) but "compatible". > > This seems reasonable. > >> 2. Model it as extract_subreg which coalescer can eliminate. >> >> #2 is conceptually correct. The problem is 128 bit XMM0 is

On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:52, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Do you have specific examples in mind that would be expressible with > something more complicated that aren't handleable via an early-clobber > constraint? Not offhand, no. I'm mostly concerned about the readability of .td files. > Perhaps spelling it out more fully with "earlyclobber" rather than >

> On May 4, 2017, at 4:53 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Alrighty, a little fuzzy on how best to implement this - Adrian, you've probably got the most context here as to how to wrangle this. > > My first attempt was in IRMover.cpp, IRLinker::linkFunctionBody - after metadata is copied over, create a new subprogram derived from Dst.getSubprogram,

I was afraid that was the case, since std::function is not a first-class object of LLVM. Every implementation that I can think of that inlines std::function intrinsically seems a bit awkward, in the way that it will be along the lines: “Treat this class (std::function) in a special way” A better way would be to generalize for all callables, and say something along the lines of “If a class has

Dear list, I'm tackling an empiric research problem that requires me to address a whole bunch of conceptual and/or technical details at the same time which cuts time short for all the nitty-gritty details of the "components" involved. Having said this, I'm lacking the time at the moment to deeply dive into parallel computing and HTTP requests via RCurl and I hope you can help me

Hi, I'm writting a source client in c#, in which I'm sending chunks of a mp3 file with http Put to IceCast. My problem is, that it is not a continues stream. Each http PUT request is an extra track. How can I generate an ongoing stream with mp3 chunks, which I send per http Put to IceCast. Any suggestions? My headers are: Headers.Add("Content-Type", "audio/mpeg");