search for: grenlow

Hi, I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire when "msdfs proxy" is used? Thank you, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current...

...I don't have the line I use with me for the preexec, but I did attempt the example in he samba man pages > i.e.: > (root) preexec = echo "hello world!" >> /tmp/mycutelog.txt > no worky worky. > > Thanks in advance! > > > -- > > Greg Enlow > grenlow at hk.mailbox.de > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > Zu buchen bei Hegel & Koch - http://www.hk-online.de > __________________________________________________...

....samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] preexec and msdfs proxy > > Hi, > > I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire > when "msdfs proxy" is used? > > Thank you, > Greg Enlow > > > -- > > Greg Enlow > grenlow at hk.mailbox.de > > > > On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: > > ok ok ... > Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. > > This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing > read-only access to the new shares under the old serv...

...uld be getting compaints and questions from our user "I ain't got that share?! WTF!!" I was going to wait to hear from Jeremy Allison before I get serious about either fuddling about with the netapp smb.conf or parsing logs on the msdfs box. 'til then, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 21 May 2015, at 05:09, David Bear wrote: Well, this doesn't fix the preexec issue, but you might scan through the samba logs finding connections to the RO share, identify that IP address there, track back to Hostname and/or user who authenticated to that share and the us...

...d lots of them. Sadly, however, the preexec function doesn't fire for us. We were really excited about all the mails we would be sending, sort of like big company sactioned spam! ;-) But, alas, something no worky worky. So, that is why I am here. 'til then, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 19 May 2015, at 08:08, Daniel M?ller wrote: Just an idea: Why dont us msdfs just pointing to the netapp with ln -s msdfs: And in the smb.conf ex: [netapp] root preexec= yourscript path=yourpath msdfs root=yes EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Kra...

...n Greg Enlow Gesendet: Samstag, 16. Mai 2015 10:16 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] preexec and msdfs proxy Hi, I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire when "msdfs proxy" is used? Thank you, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current...

...remy Allison Betreff: Re: [Samba] preexec and msdfs proxy Hi all, I was going to ask one more tine before I walk away sad and depressed - any hope on finding out why our installation won't fire 'preexec' with 'msdfs proxy' activated? 'til then! Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 18 May 2015, at 18:20, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would re...

...gt;> >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire >> when "msdfs proxy" is used? >> >> Thank you, >> Greg Enlow >> >> >> -- >> >> Greg Enlow >> grenlow at hk.mailbox.de >> >> >> >> On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: >> >> ok ok ... >> Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. >> >> This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing >> read-onl...

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the

...root.sh //REALBIGFS/Drachenboot$ %H/Drachenboot %D %U Drachenboot preexec = echo \"%u connected to %S from %m (%I)\" >> /tmp/users.txt msdfs root = yes msdfs proxy = \REALBIGFS\Drachenboot_ro$ read only = yes browseable = no follow symlinks = no hide unreadable = yes -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 12 May 2015, at 23:02, Rowland Penny wrote: On 12/05/15 20:27, Greg Enlow wrote: > To the powers the might be, > > it seems that the "(root) preexec" function does not work when used with "msdfs proxy". Is that just "my" problem, an e...

Hi list! Many questions are asked and answered about resolving user accounts. But does winbind resolve computer accounts? To elaborate some: it is perfectly all right to add computer accounts to access groups and use them in ACLs on a share or folder. For instance you would like a startup script to run on a client computer before a user logs on. Or perhaps you would like a server (account)

...or not we ould be willing to take the risk of modifiying our NETAPP and possibly endanger its warranty. If it is, however, an error then there is hope that the function 'preexec' might be repaired in a timely fashion, which would be a great help to us. Regards, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 28 May 2015, at 07:51, Daniel M?ller wrote: One more time: root preexec does: run a command or script if the user hit the share. Now with msdfs proxy it need to be run on the linked host that carries the share. So you are better to set root preexec on the share of the linked...

...the preexec issue, but you might scan through the samba logs finding connections to the RO share, identify that IP address there, track back to Hostname and/or user who authenticated to that share and the use that as the basis for the email address. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Greg Enlow <grenlow at hk.mailbox.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for you input! > > We tried that already. That, however, doesn't do the same thing. It is > then simply a DFS server and not the "magical" msdfs proxy - yes the user > can now click on a link to get to the desired...

Hi all, I was going to ask one more tine before I walk away sad and depressed - any hope on finding out why our installation won't fire 'preexec' with 'msdfs proxy' activated? 'til then! Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 18 May 2015, at 18:20, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would re...