search for: gravely

On my Mac: str(.Machine) ... $ integer.max????????? : int 2147483647 ?$ sizeof.long????????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longlong????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longdouble??? : int 16 ?$ sizeof.pointer?????? : int 8 ????? On a Windows 10 machine I have, $ sizeof.long : int 4; otherwise the same as on my Mac. ????? Am I correct that $ sizeof.long = 4 means 4 bytes = 32 bits? log2(.Machine$integer.max)

Hello, All: What would it take to make ?iconv? portable? I ask, because I want to convert accented characters to vanilla ASCII, thereby converting, e.g., ?Ra?l? to ?Raul?, and Milan Bouchet-Valet suggested on R-help that I use 'iconv(x, ?", "ASCII//TRANSLIT?)?. This worked under Windows but failed on Linux and Mac. It?s part of the ?subNonStandardCharacters? function

On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, > can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller > ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? ????? I don't perceive that as feasible.? Once I found what was generating NAs, it was easy to code a function to return pseudo-random

Yesterday, I installed R2.2.0 for Windows [Version 2.2.0 (2005-10-06 r35749)]. Unfortunately, 'install.packages("Matrix")' produced the following message: Warning in download.packages(pkgs, destdir = tmpd, available = available, : no package 'Matrix' at the repositories I installed lme4, maps, mapproj, CircStats, scatterplot3d, gregmisc, Hmisc without

Hi, all, Does anybody got the most general expression of a unitary matrix? I found one in the book, four entries of the matrix are: (cos\theta) exp(j\alpha); -(sin\theta)exp(j(\alpha-\Omega)); (sin\theta)exp(j(\beta+\Omega)); (cos\theta) exp(j\beta); where "j" is for complex. However, since for any two unitary matrices, their product should also be a unitary matrix. When I

Thanks to Luke and Avi for their comments.? I wrapped "round" around the call to "rnorm" inside my "rpois.".? For "lambda" really big, that "round" won't do anything.? However, it appears to give integers in floating point representation that are larger than .Machine$integer.max.? That sounds very much like what someone would want.?

????? This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added to the development version of Ecfun, available at "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecfun".? This is part of a vignette I'm developing, available at

> On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: > >>>>>> Spencer Graves writes: > >> Hello, All: >> What would it take to make ?iconv? portable? > > >> I ask, because I want to convert accented characters to >> vanilla ASCII, thereby converting, e.g., ?Ra?l? to ?Raul?, and >> Milan

Consider the following: plot(0, 0, xlim=c(-10, 10), ylim=c(-50, 50)) lines(c(0,0), (2*c(-pi, pi))^2) I see no line in this plot. R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18) i386-pc-mingw32 locale: LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1]

Michael Grave just posted a question about surround conferences. http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=564633430#/note.php?note_id=5009726 3908&id=564633430&index=0 I didn't see it posted on the ast-list, what do you think? Does something like this have potential? I'd love to listen in on one of these calls to see how it actually sounds if someone builds a trial

Hi, Mark et al.: Thanks, Mark. Three comments: 1. Rvmmin was one of the methods I tried after Ravi directed me to optimx. It returned NAs for essentially everything. See my email of this subject stamped 4:43 PM Central time = 21:43 UTC. 2. It would be interesting to know if the current algorithm behind optim and optimx with

Dear all, I have a population with three age-classes, at time t=0 the population is: n.zero <- c(1,0,0) I have a transition matrix A which denotes "fertility" and "survival": A <- matrix(c(0,1,5, 0.3,0,0, 0,0.5,0), ncol=3, byrow=TRUE) To obtain the population at t=1, I calculate: A %*% n.zero To obtain the population t=2, I calculate: A %*% (A %*% n.zero) ... and so

Dear List, We are planning a genotyping study to be analyzed using false discovery rates (FDRs) (See Storey and Tibshirani PNAS 2003; 100:9440-5). I am interested in learning if there is any consensus as to how many features (ie. how many P values) need to be studied before reasonably reliable FDRs can be derived. Does anyone know of a citation where this is discussed? Bill Dupont William D.

again, under another subject: sorry, maybe an all too trivial question. But we have power data from J frequency spectra and to have the same range for the data of all our subjects, we just transformed them into % values, pseudo-code: power[i,j]=power[i,j]/sum(power[i,1:J]) of course, now we have a perfect linear relationship in our x design-matrix, since all power-values for each subject sum up

Hello: The development version of Ecdat on R-Forge contains a vignette in which optim(?, method=?L-BFGS-B?) stops with an error message while violating the lower bound. To see all the details, try the following: install.packages("Ecdat", repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org") Then do "help(pac=Ecdat)" -> "User guides, package

Dear R users; Ive got two questions concerning nlme library 3.1-65 (running on R 2.2.0 / Win XP Pro). The first one is related to augPred function. Ive been working with a nonlinear mixed model with no problems so far. However, when the parameters of the model are specified in terms of some other covariates, say treatment (i.e. phi1~trt1+trt2, etc) the augPred function give me the following

This error can arise when getOption("width") is too small. 80 seems to be the limit for me with R-3.3.2 on Windows. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > Hello: > > > I tried "debug(help)" with the problem mentioned below. It stopped > with a call to

R uses the C 'int' type for its integer data and that is pretty much universally 32 bit these days. In fact R wont' compile if it is not. That means the range for integer data is the integers in [-2^31, +2^31). It would be good to allow for a larger integer range for R integer objects, and several of us are thinking about how me might get there. But it isn't easy to get right, so

On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Spencer Graves writes:

> From: Spencer Graves [mailto:spencer.graves at pdf.com] > > Martin says, "This is another instance of S-Plus following R > behind and doing it incompatibly [with a reason?] ... ." > > This is one example of a major issue in "how to wage and win a > standards war", discussed by Shapiro and Varian (1998) > Information Rules >