search for: gpled

Hi, I'm searching for GPLed softphones. I found WengoPhone but actually not available for Asterisk PBX, only for Wengo network. I found Kiax but only for IAX protocol. Did you know a good GPLed softphones which works on Windows ? Thanks Greg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

...should I base it on the portable source ? I think I know the answer to that one. If someone wants to take my diffs against base and integrate them into portable, that would be awesome, since I won't be able to get around to it for a while. 2. minor issue 2: I am currently using 2 files from a GPLed program in my port. It will take some work to remove them, but I can do so if it's not desirable to have GPLed source in an OpenSSH port. 3. THE major issue: How do I distribute this ? send diffs to the portable distribution maintainer(s) ? Since I live in the U.S, I obviously cannot make it a...

Hello All, Sorry to rehash a question I am sure has shown several time but I cannot google up the answer from the lists. Does anyone know where I can get some royalty free, cost free music for my music on hold? I saw someone's post several weeks ago that said that this exists at a download site but I have not been able to find it. Thanks! Wiley Siler -------------- next

...r OggVorbis, but there are some license issues that I don't know/understand. In plain text: can he create and distribute a component that uses the code available in the Windows SDK, either in the DLL presentation and/or the OBJ/LIB way without any restrictions? Does his code will have to be GPLed? As far as I undesrstand, there is no restrictions whatsoever with the use of the vorbis software libraries, other than there is an acknowledgement to Xiph.org for using the codec source, isn't? He is not trying to use or distribute other parts of the SDK (i.e., not vorbistools, etc). The o...

...ode has been tried at least briefly with the postgres and postgres-pr gems as well, with no *obvious* problems). Development of this code has been supported by Japan Spatial Information Technology, Inc., and I''ve got their permission to release it on the same terms as PostGIS --- that is, GPLed. (We may be switching to a less restrictive license later, as management permits, but it''s GPLed for now). We hope you have fun with it. Robert Thau rst@alum.mit.edu

after creating a git clone I executed "bootstrap" and then entered "libguestfs/.gnulib/modules" and executed "grep -rn GPL * | grep ":GPL" | grep -v "build tool" > ~/GPLed" On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>wrote: > How did you construct this list? It appears to list modules which are > not used by libguestfs directly or indirectly, eg (picked at random): > > > avltreehash-list:31:GPL > > avltr...

Hello, I have ported rsync 2.5.5 to Netware and would like to, at least, contribute the binary so that people can download it. It says on the website to use the bug tracking system to do this, but since that isn't working, I thought I would try this. Thanks for any help or direction. Lee

...the matter, I could not find any statement that could be considered the agreed upon position of the CRAN maintainers and/or the R Foundation. The closest I could find are several replies by Duncan Murdoch where he writes that a package author is free in his choice of license if no actual copying of GPLed code takes place https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-September/042716.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2010-June/240945.html and where he takes a critical stand against the quoted FSF interpretation of the GPL: > By your line of reasoning (which I > don't agree with)...

Hello, I believe that ZFS and it''s concepts is truly revolutionary to the point that I no longer see any OS as modern if it does not have comparable storage functionality. Therefore I think that file system/disk manager with similar qualities should be written for Linux. Does Sun have plans to dual license ZFS as GPL so it can be ported to native Linux? If not, is it legal to write

...o's CD, and copy key files from it. Among those files are those that I think are associated with the the SYSLINUX/ISOLINUX project; e.g.: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/images/ http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/isolinux/ Two questions: - As the SYSLINUX project is GPLed, to hand out binaries implies the sources are available somewhere, but I can't find an official point of reference on where the corresponding sources are. - Further, near as I can tell, the SYSLINUX project makes no reference to Kickstart, but I do see Fedora refer to Kickstart: htt...

...personally have no problems with the source being used for whatever. I want to keep the *libs* under LGPL and the command line tool once finished under GPL, but the rest of the code could be out in the public domain for all I care. Oh, and I certainly don't want the simple act of reading the GPLed code to taint other projects; if you want to write you own with the GPLed code as a guide, you should be able to. Peter: Is there anything in the XMMS licensing that would prevent such a use of the XMMS Vorbis plugin? Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project...

...in the presence of unrecognised streams, <href="http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~ibm21/omd_players/index.html#hxplugin> The patches won't go into Helixcommunity until I've put in a joint copyright document (and the stream end strategy patch still needs to be completed), but they can be GPLed so if anyone wants the changes just ask for them. -- imalone

...any other > > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. > That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make > the proprietary application 'derived work'. This is what the FSF would like the world to believe. If you distribute the GPLed library and the proprietary application separately, and make sure that they are linked at installation time, the link step creates a derived work indeed but that's inconsequential because it isn't redistributed. IANAL etc., and there are issues regarding the use of interface files (.h files...

Hi, > If you distribute the GPLed library and the proprietary application > separately, and make sure that they are linked at installation time, the > link step creates a derived work indeed but that's inconsequential > because it isn't redistributed. Interestingly enough, you need a linker at the target system to...

Hi, The libFirm library ( http://www.info.uni-karlsruhe.de/software/libfirm/index.php?title=Main_Page ) is GPLed some time ago. libFirm is a library that provides an intermediate representation and optimizations for compilers. Programs are represented in a graph based SSA form. Several targets are supported, especially the x86. Many optimizations are very similar to those of LLVM. But there are also some di...

...l Mroz dataset in my package. This full dataset can be downloaded from some internet sites (e.g. pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wgreene/Text/econometricanalysis.htm, www.stata.com/texts/eacsap/), but I did not find any license information. Whom do I have to ask wether I am allowed to put these data in a GPLed R package? (Mr. Mroz, Mr. Greene, STATA, University of Michigan (PSID), . . . ) @John: Do you have any license information on these data? Thanks, Arne -- Arne Henningsen Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kiel Olshausenstr. 40 D-24098 Kiel (Germany) Tel: +49-431-880 4445 Fax: +...

Hello, Razvan > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make the proprietary application 'derived work'. > - I didn't find any commercial projects (not Operating Systems or > dual-licensed but simple

Hi, Can you please share the standard document of Speex codec. I have the api doc and speex manual but it doesnt have the details about the mode of operation and bitrate details etc., So can u please give us those details. Thanks & Regards, Jyothiprakash Reddy, T --------------------------------- Here?s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers

...r fear of upsetting development partners. That being said: I have compiled the beta4 source (without modifying it) and wrapped it into a plugin for a commercial multimedia collaboration software. This software is distributed freely. Unfortunately, our plugin API is proprietary and cannot be GPLed. Even worse, I couldn't find any precompiled vorbis libraries for Mac so it looks like I'm out of luck on the business friendly BSD front unless... Is it ok to compile the vorbis source verbatim with the provided codewarrior projects, give Xiphorous credit, and assume the result is BS...

Hi all, I have just successfully ported openssh-2.1.0p3 to Cygwin. As you may know, Cygwin is a GPLed POSIX layer for Windows OSes. To be serious: I don't _like_ Windows systems and sometimes I really hate that STUPID concessions which are necessary when trying to get U*X software working on Windoze but for some reason that's exactly the reason, why I love to work on Cygwin! Porting to Cyg...