search for: gpf

Hi, I''m running Xen 4.2.0 with Linux kernel 3.7.0 and I''m seeing a flood of these messages in xen dmesg: (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): fff...

...ng #http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c63041428cc348bcb2887afabd606bc4bd5523f #a try on top of your 4.3.2 (or trying the tip of the stable-4.3 branch)? # #> What else did I miss that could be useful info? # #At least the resolution of these addresses # #(XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa #(XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa # #into (symbol,offset) pairs, so we can at least make a first guess at #whether these are in any way related to your problem. Booted into xen compiled with xen-syms. Hope this...

...ind giving http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c63041428cc348bcb2887afabd606bc4bd5523f a try on top of your 4.3.2 (or trying the tip of the stable-4.3 branch)? > What else did I miss that could be useful info? At least the resolution of these addresses (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa into (symbol,offset) pairs, so we can at least make a first guess at whether these are in any way related to your problem. Jan

Running Borderlands GOTY on Wine 1.3.35 with WINEPREFIX=win32 on amd64 with WINEDEBUG=warn+all produces the following error log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/779465/ (warning: 8 MB) A tl;dr of this is GPF followed by std::terminate->abort() due to pure virtual function call. What am I doing wrong, as a Gold rating on appdb implies that the game should be working? -- 001100 Andrey "m05hbear" Vul 010010 011110 andrey at moshbear dot net 100001 andrey dot vul at gmail 101101 4163039923 1...

Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk> writes: #What were the previous settings (the ones which worked for grub but not #Xen)? Do these new settings work with native Linux? # #Given the change in behaviour my gut feeling is that either the Legacy #USB Support option or the 60/64 emulation ones are the one which matters #out of that set. The default and previous settings were everything

Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04

Hi, current paravirt patchqueue dies with ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7) EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94 eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04

...it;a=commitdiff;h=6c63041428cc348bcb2 > 887afabd606bc4bd5523f > #a try on top of your 4.3.2 (or trying the tip of the stable-4.3 branch)? > # > #> What else did I miss that could be useful info? > # > #At least the resolution of these addresses > # > #(XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa > #(XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa > # > #into (symbol,offset) pairs, so we can at least make a first guess at > #whether these are in any way related to your problem. > > Booted into xen comp...

...t machines: The non-Xen boot shows a DMAR ACPI table, while the Xen one doesn't. Or wait, no, the hypervisor and kernel-under-Xen logs differ in that respect too. We clearly need a consistent set of logs. The one clearly odd thing in the hypervisor logs are these two lines (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa Can at least the left side address please be associated back with a symbol (with the help of xen-syms perhaps)? And finally, looking at the IRQ usage, this [ 2.087722] xen:...

...t, apparently, is that the function should return zero if the original idx exceeds 0x40000000. However because idx is unsigned the function will always return zero unlessthe original idx is precisely 0x40000000. The effect is that reading or writing any unexpected MSR will cause the guest to get a GPF. (The intended effect is, I think, reading any MSR less than 0x40000001 should simply return 0 and writing any such MSR should bug. Injecting a GPF should only happen with MSRs greater than 0x40000000.) Replacing the test with if ( (int32_t)idx > 0 ) seems to cause problems of its own. If...

...ll log is at: http://pastebin.com/YCYUXWvV. It was in my messages, so I guess the system took a bit to die completely. nouveau is somewhat implicated, as it is the first thing that hits an allocation failure in nouveau_vm_create, and has a subsequent warn in nouveau_mm_fini, but then there's a GPF in __alloc_skb/__kmalloc_track_caller (and I'm using SLUB). Here is a partial disassembly for __kmalloc_track_caller: 0xffffffff811325b1 <+138>: e8 a0 60 56 00 callq 0xffffffff81698656 <__slab_alloc.constprop.68> 0xffffffff811325b6 <+143>: 49 89 c4 mov %r...

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Bruno Pr?mont <bonbons at linux-vserver.org> wrote: > Hi, > > With 3.13-rc1 and 3.13-rc2 kernel crashes/BUGs while loading nouveau: > [ 657.654915] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20131115/nsarguments-95) > [ 657.655099] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IXVE.IGPU._DSM:

I''m having trouble switching into user mode with my domU kernel -- everytime I call __HYPERVISOR_iret, the hypervisor calls into my kernel via the registered callback handler. None of the bits in the event channel pending arrays are set. If I return via the iret call, the hypervisor immediately calls back into the handler. The user RIP never changes, so it is clearly not making forward

Hi I got a strange error, happening on two of my ext3 partitions. What can be wrong? And why does e2fsck error out, instead of displaying an error message? Best regards keld fsck /dev/hda6 fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) Warning... fsck.ext3 for device /dev/hda6 exited with signal 11. also From my dmesg: <1>general protection fault: e7a8 [#3] Modules linked in:

...lt), so I''ve tried running it in a HVM domU (CentOS 5, with PV drivers to improve the network performance). I''ve seen several posts on several lists via Google suggesting that HVM domU''s have a virtual ring 0, which should suffice. While I''m no longer getting a GPF, the Windows VM still refuses to start, most of the time giving me no error message but sometimes it pops up a box telling me about an unrecoverable error, unexpected signal 11. I can''t determine anything useful from the log file either. So, the question is, has anyone tried (or had any...

...s > a DMAR ACPI table, while the Xen one doesn't. Or wait, no, the > hypervisor and kernel-under-Xen logs differ in that respect too. We > clearly need a consistent set of logs. > > The one clearly odd thing in the hypervisor logs are these two lines > > (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa > (XEN) traps.c:3061: GPF (0000): ffff82c4c0186a91 -> ffff82c4c0218daa > > Can at least the left side address please be associated back with a > symbol (with the help of xen-syms perhaps)? As this is a debug message anyway, it would be...

I tried to upgrade one user's system, a Dell Optiplex GX620, and yum got a GPF. After *much* grief, I finally gave up, and rebuilt the system. Or, rather, I'm trying to. First problem: I did a minimal install from the graphical installer - I don't know if that's relevant - but when it boots, it does *not* install the NIC driver, tg3, on boot. I've got eth0 de...

...moderator L. Rahyen I've run into a small problem with the current release. I can do the initial load of VirtualDubMod (I've always used wine for it) but when I try to have it read a file the startup window starts screaming for about 800 lines it can't find libGL.so then gives up and GPF's on me. But I have the 32 bit version of the Mesa libraries installed at /usr/lib and the 32 bit version of the X11R7.3 mesa libraries installed at /usr/local/lib and the corresponding 64 bit installed in /usr/lib64 and /usr/local/lib64 . I've also checked the ld.so.conf file to see wha...

-- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

...his only happens if the createJIT OptLevel is set to Default (vs None). According to http://www.jaist.ac.jp/iscenter-new/mpc/altix/altixdata/opt/intel/vtune/doc/users_guide/mergedProjects/analyzer_ec/mergedProjects/reference_olh/mergedProjects/instructions/instruct32_hh/vc8a.htm that will cause a GPF. I've attached the LLVM IR and a copy of the Disassembly this results in. The crash occurs at 00370872 At the time of the crash, ESP is set to 0018EEF8 - this results in a value is not 16 byte aligned. I notice that the offset is aligned though. The crash occurs on the first instance of ad...