search for: gourmets

Brilliant, thanks very much!! Works fine. Dan On 6 Dec 2012, at 18:25, arun kirshna [via R] wrote: > Hi, > Your question is not very clear. I hope you are not looking for the subset option in summary(lm()). > If you want just the summary(), then use '&' or '|' > For e.g. > dat1<-read.table(text=" > opcorn Oilamt Batch Yield >

mailing list subscription and C/R system mail does not harmonize! Warren - whoever you are - please subscribe with a mail address which accepts delivery without such nasty bounces! (Got the bounce instantly to my last reply to "Error when starting apache".) Alexander -----Weitergeleitete Nachricht----- > From: centos.5.warren at recursor.net > To: ad+lists at uni-x.org >

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

I asked the debian maintainer to add btrfs-zero-log to the initramfs since I unfortunately have to use it from time to time. It still fixes the problem for me when btrfs won''t mount, but it errors at the end. See screenshot Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....

I just setup a new SSD with my laptop root filesystem, and at the time I though, "eh, I''ll just use zlib compression during the first copy, and then switch to lzo afterwards to maintain write speed when I''m using the laptop after the copy and reboot". Now, I rebooted with the new ssd and zlib compressed rootfs, and it seemed to boot slower than it did before with the

Since I heard absolutely nothing on my last but and corruption report, I''m not sure if they are useful or wanted (please let me know). The last thing I''ve seen with 3.4.4 is this: kernel: [116130.309667] btrfs: unlinked 25 orphans kernel: [117951.440823] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff8801e2a4c080 idx:1 val:-1 kernel: [117951.440832] BUG: Bad rss-counter state

Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:

Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time to time, and too often it triggers this bug in btrfs which is quite hard to recover from. The bigger problem is that all the user sees (if anything) is seemingly unrelated info, namely, "RIP: btrfs_num_copies+0x42/0x0b" or somesuch http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs_num_copies.jpg It''s only if you have serial console, or netconsole,

Hi everybody, I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can''t qualify the circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system freezes for some time. Maybe somebody could suggest some general things I could try to search for the problem? Thanks in advance, Florian --- Some background information: $ mount |

Hi R gourmets, I am trying to convert an HTML table into an xts object. The table has six columns, with the data of interest in a single row with each cell containing a long, \n-delimited character string. Initially, I work with these strings as elements in a list. This is necessary because the strings in e...

I don't know if this has been requested before, but I would really like for rsync to compute an md5sum for each file at the source and destination (with a flag turned off by default of course), and it would realize that I renamed files at the source by noticing a matching md5sum between different filenames It would then rename the destination instead of deleting it and resending the entire

Here is what my data looks like: source:~# ls -ld /data /data/etc2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-03 23:32 /data -> /export/hda3 -rw-r--r-- 1 produser prod 4 2010-06-15 17:30 /data/etc2 destination:/# ls -l /data lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-15 18:36 /data -> /export/hda3 Let's start with an ancient rsync: source:~# rsync-broken --version rsync version 2.4.6 protocol

Hi all, I hoping someone out there might be able to tell my how to configure and Samba box to be a PDC and BDC for a windows network? I'd like to use the LDAP backend, but and too new to the Unix world to understand how this is accomplished. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Charlie

Hi, I was hoping to use wine to run one of those stupid windows binaries that generate a floppy (at least IBM has a clue, and also offers the raw floppy image for dd-ing) In this case, the culprit is seagate's seatools: http://www.seagate.com/support/seatools/ I installed wine under debian unstable (Version: 0.0.20010824-1) and when I run the windows binary under wine, it runs but

Hello, I am trying to install Win2008 x64 on xen. However it always crashes with: 0x0000005b which from my research means incompatible CPU. Can anyone assist with this? How can I get x64 to work? cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 2 model name : Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2344 HE grep svm /proc/cpuinfo flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8

Is it expected that running btrfsck more than once will keep reporting errors? Below is the end of a btrfsck output when run the second time. backpointer mismatch on [111942471680 32768] owner ref check failed [111942471680 32768] ref mismatch on [111942504448 40960] extent item 1, found 0 Incorrect local backref count on 111942504448 root 5 owner 160739 offset 3440640 found 0 wanted 1 back

Reviews Wanted. I''ve read the tables of contents and haven''t yet made up my mind. Is one book clearly better than the other? Is one clearly full of bugs? Is one so much further ahead that there is no choice? Are they both so incomplete that I should just wait and only cook real food? Do trains still have dining cars? Warren Fred -------------- next part -------------- An

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

Hello, This is the second attempt to bring in cross subvolume reflinks into btrfs. The first attempt was NAKed due to missing vfs mount checks and a clear description of what btrfs subvolumes are and probably also why cross subvolume reflinks are ok in the case of btrfs. This version of the patch comes from David and is in SUSE kernels since a long time, so it is tested and working. The patch