search for: gotton

...e we don't want the phones to ring we jump to the unavailable VM. I've tested this and it works as I expect but my only concern is how this would hold up in a busy environment where many calls are being processed. Could one asterisk thread delete the database key before another thread had gotton the oportunity to test for the key ? [macro-stdexten] exten => s,1,NoOp < other testing crap deleted > exten => s,10,DBget(foo=FEATURE/DAY) ; is it day time ? exten => s,11,DBdel(FEATURE/DAY) ; yes, delete the key exten => s,12,Goto(s,201) ; and ring the...

...I had made them completely backwards compatable with the old -- please let me know specifics if I overlooked something. The routines that make use of the rate tables can now use multiple date types, but they still support the older 'date' class. 2. My local code and the R code had gotton badly out of sync, I spent a substantial fraction of my evenings re-merging them for over a year. 2/3 of the changes were disjoint improvments in the two trees, these were easy to merge. The hardest were survfit and its print/plot methods and some summary methods, where both of us had worked...

...acter variables into factors by default. I can get into a long arguement as to why later, and will give one example of why below. The default behavior of S, Splus and R has been to create dummy variables for factor, character, and logical variables. This is good. Why has R suddenly gotton a compulsion to put out a warning message for any model where we do this? I contend that it is - confusing - unnecessary - and wrong. It is certainly confusing, as it implies a behavior change when there has been no change. The fact that the "factor" command was used beh...

I've gotton some good responses; thanks for the input. I'll proceed with my repairs down another path. An underlying question then is "if the model frame is near useless, as the responses indicate, then why do all the standard methods save it (lm, glm, ..)"? I suspect the answer is that it...

Hi, R users, I'm running a Tobit model but convergence can not be reached within 30 iterations. Is there anyway I can change the max number of iterations? Thanks. Gary [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...a random slopes model: coxme(Surv(time, status) ~ rx+x2, data=rats2, random=~ (1+x2)|litter) Synopsis a. coxme does not yet support random slopes models b. it should recognize the request and print a sensible error, instead it just dies further down in the routine after it has gotton thoroughly confused. c. the actual error message is interesting, as an example of just how odd the error message from a confused routine can be; but has no other use. Thanks to Jing Zhao who forwarded the message on to me, as I prefer Splus (blasphemy!) and don't monitor the r-h...

Hi I have done a light implementation of the YUI Carousel Feel free to try or use it http://prototype-carousel.xilinus.com/ Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To

...rlying routines. I think you want lmekin(y ~ x1 + x2 + (1| subject), data=yourdata, varlist= D) or some such, where D is the similarity or "correlation" form of you distance matrix. A downside is that lmekin is sort of the poor cousin to comxe -- with finite time I've never gotton around to writing predict, residuals, plot, ... methods for it. The basic fit is fine though. Terry Therneau (In general I agree with Bert & Ben to try the other list, but I don't happen to read it.) On 06/04/2013 05:00 AM, r-help-request at r-project.org wrote: > Hi, > I'm t...

I'm trying to use RDNIS with asterisk, and I don't appear to be receiving any information (the value is blank). The upstream who provides the PRI says they are passing all the info through, I don't see this value coming across. I've tried it with a Verizon call forward, as well as a Nextel with the same results for both. I'm trying to use this for Voicemail. I'm using

Dear Samba and Linux list users - Several people have commented on the volume of spam reaching the list. Andrew (the list maintainer, I am but a lowly assistant) has been advised of your comments and will take action if he thinks it's necessary. People wishing to make further comment should do so directly to the list admins and NOT, repeat NOT to the list itself! My thanks to those list

Dear List, Can anyone please explain the difference between cluster() and frailty() in a coxph? I am a bit puzzled about it. Would appreciate any useful reference or direction. cheers, Ehsan > marginal.model <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + cluster(litter), rats) > frailty.model <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + frailty(litter), rats) > marginal.model Call: coxph(formula =

I've read the back and forth this morning, and I have to side with Vince. 1. Functions that re-interpret their arguments are very dangerous. The original question involved a well formed call to a function, which returned the wrong answer. Bug, design flaw, whatever -- it's a mistake and the best choice would be to fix it. I only consider such behavior in 2 cases: a. when the

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

...lt;- survreg(Surv(time, status) ~ x1 + x2, dist='gaussian',..) with appropriate additional arguments to the Surv function if the data is left or interval censored. If survreg doesn't converge in 30 iterations it likely won't converge in 100 or more. The Newton-Raphson algoritm has gotton lost. Data sets with a very large fraction of censored observations can be numerically challenging. help(survreg.control) will tell you all the necessary details however. Over the years I have accumulated a few data sets that were very difficult maximizations for survreg, and led to further tuni...