Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "gobi".
Did you mean:
gabi
2015 Aug 27
0
C6 HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module
Anyone got an HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module working in C6?
Care to give me some pointers about how/where to begin?
Thanks
Patrick
2008 Sep 24
2
[LLVMdev] Named Address Spaces
...o the
LLVM IR, and I was wondering if llvm-gcc is able to use this
functionallity. If so, what syntax is used to assign address spaces, and
what files are needed for the address spaces to be defined in the backend.
If not, how do users capitalize on this functionallity?
Thank you for your time,
- Gobi
2004 Nov 24
1
R-2.0.1 and Rggobi
Hi,
I've had no luck with the combination of R-2.0.1 and Rggobi/gobi (1.1-1
and 1.0-1 beta). I've tried a default configuration of ggobi, as well
as one with all the plugins enabled. I'm using RedHat 9 Linux.
The problem I'm experiencing is a segmentation fault when library.dynam
is called from .First.lib
ggobi appears to work OK from the com...
2008 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Named Address Spaces
Hi Gobi,
> I am a student trying to find out if LLVM can be used for the Embedded C
> architecture that I will be developing tools for at work. In LLVM 2.2
> Christopher Lamb contributed support for Multiple Address Spaces into the
> LLVM IR, and I was wondering if llvm-gcc is able to use this...
2008 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] Named Address Spaces
> though I don't know what, where, or if there are any backends using this info
> already. Perhaps others can comment?
>
We plan to use the address space info in backend to support the "rom"
address space for our target in near future.
- Sanjiv
2008 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] Named Address Spaces
> We plan to use the address space info in backend to support the "rom"
> address space for our target in near future.
This will likely relate to what I am doing, however, my manager and I are
currently trying to plan the entire toolchain, and key aspects involve both
propogating debug information and verifying variables using named address
spaces.
2003 Sep 19
4
3D plotting in R
A student is trying to cluster some data. Tree-building things seem to
be pretty hopeless (we've tried most of the ones in R, I think).
Multi-dimensional scaling produces somewhat tantalising results:
things do clump together somewhat, but the clusters overlap a lot.
I was wondering if these was an artefact of squeezing it down to 2D,
and whether 3D might be better. So
loc <-
2003 Jun 23
7
How can I do a spinning plot in R?
I have found XLispStat's spinning plots illuminating.
I'd like to do the same thing in R.
A dozen or so probes with help, help.search, apropos
haven't turned up anything, and I've even resorted to
grepping through the entire R source distribution
looking for 'spin.*plot', to no avail.
Either the feature is called something else in R (what?),
or it's in some other
2013 Mar 18
0
[linux-linus test] 17325: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 17325 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17325/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 15 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-xl 15 guest-stop
2013 Mar 29
0
[linux-linus test] 17454: regressions - FAIL
flight 17454 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17454/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail
2013 Apr 10
0
[linux-linus test] 17612: regressions - FAIL
flight 17612 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17612/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail
2013 May 05
0
[linux-linus test] 17901: regressions - FAIL
flight 17901 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17901/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-pv 4
2013 May 07
0
[linux-linus test] 17916: regressions - FAIL
flight 17916 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17916/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 4
2013 Jun 16
0
[linux-linus test] 18150: regressions - FAIL
flight 18150 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18150/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Jun 23
0
[linux-linus test] 18181: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 18181 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18181/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18805: regressions - FAIL
flight 18805 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18805/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18844: regressions - FAIL
flight 18844 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18844/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12557
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail
2015 Jun 01
0
Opus inband FEC performance with bursty loss?
Hi all,
Newbie to the group.
Just started using Opus as part of a WebRTC project and amazed by the versatility of the codec. Great stuff!!!!
I have been trying to understand the performance of Opus inband FEC in the presence of bursty loss. Although I do not have exact characterization of the loss profile, we are seeing issues over WiFi. RTCP reports about 33% loss, but I am guessing a lot of it