search for: gabi

...205 ==20504==    at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) ==20504==    by 0x906E59: std::vector<llvm::Type const*, std::allocator<llvm::Type const*> >::vector(std::vector<llvm::Type const*, std::allocator<llvm::Type const*> > const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==20504==    by 0x9070B4: std::_Rb_tree<llvm::FunctionValType, std::pair<llvm::FunctionValType const, llvm::PATypeHolder>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<llvm::FunctionValType const, llvm::PATypeHolder> >, std::less<llvm::FunctionValType>, std::allocator<st...

Hi, My apologies if this has been mentioned before, I haven't pulled up a google search yet. I run Dovecot from the package under OpenBSD 3.6 (dovecot-0.99.10.8). The problem I have is that occasionally dovecot corrupts an index file (I think), which causes the process to gradually creep up in usage, until it hits 99%, where it stays, without quitting. If I then fire up my mail client

...leaks won't go away Valgrind gives me lots of .. 110,560 bytes in 1,382 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 176 of 181 ==17474== at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) ==17474== by 0x90A922: llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x88A5B6: llvm::ConstantFP::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::APFloat const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x925E17: llvm::ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(unsigned int, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474==...

Hi, I'm new to Xapian and wanted to know if it has a specific feature. I want to be able to check the relation between two terms on a page based on how close they are together on the page. I want to use a combination of n-gram based labeling and the "slop" feature found in Elasticsearch. Does Xapian have this/a similar feature? I haven't been able to find any programs that have

Gracias, si uso R estudio, cree un documento nuevo, deje el ejemplo que el Restudio trae y me volvio a aparecer el mismo error, que puedo hacer para solucionarlo? El 1 de julio de 2013 15:21, Marcuzzi, Javier Rubén < javier.ruben.marcuzzi@gmail.com> escribió: > Estimada Gaby Nieves > > Si usted usa Rsutudio puede crear un archivo nuevo, le sugiero crear este, > sin colocar

...>>> Hello, >>> >>> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >>> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >>> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >>> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >>> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >>> >> >> Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a >> sequence of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are...

...>>>>> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >>>>> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >>>>> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >>>>> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >>>>> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a >>>> sequence of ULEB1...

...>>>> >>>> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >>>> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >>>> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >>>> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >>>> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a >>> sequence of ULEB128-encoded symbol ta...

Please keep replies on the mailing list — more people can help (and benefit) that way :) So OP_NEAR looks for its terms close to each other (hence "near"). The window is how far away they can be. Probably the easiest way to play with this is using the NEAR syntax in the query parser. So if you had a plain text document: I am walking, always walking. And index it in a very simple

Si, ya habia hecho un archivo markdown y lo habia corrido hace unos cuantos meses El sistema es windows 7 y R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) el mensaje es el siguiente: > require(knitr); knit('Quiz1Markdown.Rmd', encoding='ISO8859-1'); Loading required package: knitr Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : there is no package called

...contain an entry "force group" which specifies a local unix group and when there exists a unix user with the same name. Here's an excerpt from smb.conf: [FactWork] comment = FactWork-Downloadportal path = /web/Fee/download/factwork valid users = @webadmin,fee\gabi, at fee\g_tb3,fee\administrator,fee\svtb3$ write list = @webadmin,fee\gabi, at fee\g_tb3,fee\administrator force group = webadmin create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0664 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 writeable = Yes...

...>>> Hello, >>> >>> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >>> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >>> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >>> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >>> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >> >> >> Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a sequence >> of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are add...

...t; # auth methods = winbind > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind expand groups = 1 > deadtime = 1 > > load printers = no > printing = bsd > > [web] > comment = Web-Konfiguration > path = /data/web > valid users = @webadmin,fee\gabi,fee\franz.la,fee\hans,fee\eva.gi,fee\robert.lo,fee\peter.me,fee\chris.sch,fee\jeremy.pr > write list = @webadmin,fee\gabi,fee\franz.la,fee\hans,fee\eva.gi,fee\robert.lo,fee\peter.me,fee\chris.sch,fee\jeremy.pr > > force group = webadmin > create mask = 0664 > # security mask = 066...

...My question - Does section 4 above makes the EE recompile the function 1000 times? If no, why is the performance is so bad? what am I doing wrong ? Maybe I should somehow cache the function's binary code? llvm-version 2.7 OS: Linux 2.6.31 64 bits (intel dual core, 4GB memory) -- Regards, Gabi http://bugspy.net

Estimada Gaby Mi configuración es la siguiente y funciona ¿esta le funciona a usted? From: Gaby nieves Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:13 PM To: Marcuzzi, Javier Rubén Cc: r-help-es en r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-es] Error al correr archivo markdown Gracias, si uso R estudio, cree un documento nuevo, deje el ejemplo que el Restudio trae y me volvio a aparecer el mismo error, que puedo hacer

Hi Gabi, I have no idea why your performances is not as expected with such low level of informations. But, I know that the binary code is cached by the JIT. You can find the code in JIT.cpp to convince yourself : runFunction -> getPointerToFunction ->getPointerToGlobalIfAvailable which returns the...

...rg> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >> > > Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a sequence > of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are address-significant...

...Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I think that the approach of using a section to record address > significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section > type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this > to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it > could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? > Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a sequence of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are address-significant). I think it makes s...

Hi, I'm having a hideous problem trying to get the latest stable version to work. I've had no success and simply can't pinpoint the problem. Sorry for the rather long email but I've included as many details as I can to help here. I've been trying to install the latest stable version (as of 23rd May 2005) by downloading the tarball from the site to my OpenBSD 3.6 box,

Hi, Some LLVM classes (e.g. ReturnInst) have explicit constructors with at least two parameters (with no default arguments). Why is that? E.g. what are they trying to prevent? -- Gaby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150314/4d4cc6cc/attachment.html>