search for: gnutls_key_generate

...ry service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's > probably better than what we have now. Here's where we left things last time it came up: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a deterministic seed. If not (including if we are not linked with gnutls), then we should prefer the new Linux sys...

...>>> probably better than what we have now. >> >> Here's where we left things last time it came up: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html >> >> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits >> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of >> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking >> things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a >> deterministic seed. >> >> If not (including if we are not linked with gnutls),...

...;>>> >>>> Here's where we left things last time it came up: >>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html >>>> >>>> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits >>>> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of >>>> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking >>>> things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a >>>> deterministic seed. >>>> >>>> If not (incl...

...gs last time it came up: >> > > > > >> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html >> > > > > >> > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits >> > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of >> > > > > our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking >> > > > > things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a >> > > > > deterministic seed. >> &...

...wants some random bits. But it's >> probably better than what we have now. > >Here's where we left things last time it came up: > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html > >If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits >(gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of >our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking >things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a >deterministic seed. > >If not (including if we are not linked with gnutls), then we should >pref...

...r than what we have now. >>> >>> Here's where we left things last time it came up: >>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html >>> >>> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits >>> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of >>> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking >>> things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a >>> deterministic seed. >>> >>> If not (including if we are not...

...where we left things last time it came up: > > > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html > > > > > > > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits > > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of > > > > > our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking > > > > > things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a > > > > > deterministic seed. > > > > &g...

...> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits > > > > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of > > > > > > > our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking > > > > > > > things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a > > > > > > > deterministi...

Reviving an ancient thread: On 11/04/2014 02:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:09:12AM -0500, Brian Rak wrote: >> I just ran into an issue where I had about 30 guests get duplicate mac >> addresses assigned. These were scattered across 30 different machines. >> >> Some debugging revealed that: >> >> 1) All the host machines were