search for: glusterxxx

...:48 Subject:RE: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs CC:gluster-users at gluster.org; To:Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>; PS: I just tested between these 2: ? mount -t glusterfs -o negative-timeout=1,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www ?mount -t glusterfs -o use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www ?So it means only 1 second negative timeout... ?In this particular test:?./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --thread...

...at hosted-power.com <mailto:jo.goossens at hosted-power.com> > wrote: Hello Joe, ? ? I just did a mount like this (added the bold): ? mount -t glusterfs -o attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-timeout=600,fopen-keep-cache,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www ?Results: ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 smallfile version 3.0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41'] ? ? ?...

...sted-power.com> wrote: > Hello Joe, > > > > > > I just did a mount like this (added the bold): > > > mount -t glusterfs -o > *attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-timeout=600,fopen-keep-cache* > ,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log > 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www > > > Results: > > > root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py --top /var/www/test > --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 > --record-size 64 > smallfile version 3.0 >...

Hello Joe, ? ? I just did a mount like this (added the bold): ? mount -t glusterfs -o attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-timeout=600,fopen-keep-cache,use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www ?Results: ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 smallfile version 3.0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41'] ? ? ?...

...e with >> gluster 3.10, there are no other differences, except >> glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times faster: >> >> root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o >> use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log >> 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www >> root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py --top >> /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files >> 500 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 >> smallfile version 3.0 >...

Hello, ? ? Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times faster: ? ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 smallfile version 3.0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41'] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?...

...? ? Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times faster: ? ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 smallfile version 3.0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41'] ? ? ? ? ? ?...

...gt;; Hello, ? ? Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times faster: ? ? root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size 64 smallfile version 3.0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41'] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?...

Hi all, ? ? One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it, replicated on 3 different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes are app servers at the same time). We could actually almost work locally if we wouldn't need to have the same files on the 3 nodes and redundancy :) ? Initial cluster was created like this: ? gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp

...eedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster > 3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. > The nfs is about 80 times faster: > > root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o > use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log > 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www > root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py --top > /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 > --file-size 64 --record-size 64 > smallfile version 3.0 > hosts in...