Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "global_state".
2008 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] Store patterns accepting i32 only?
I'm trying to write a store pattern that accepts both i32 and f32,
however, when tablegen generates the code, it only generates the code
for i32 only.
def ADDR : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, "SelectADDR", [], []>;
def MEM : Operand<i32> {
let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand";
let MIOperandInfo = (ops GPR, GPR);
}
def global_st :
2013 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] llvm.meta (was Rotated loop identification)
...e_aligned and this
> scheme is the control dependencies. In gcc, it is the return value of the
> intrinsic that carries the alignment guarantee, and I think that this makes
> a lot of sense. Consider something like this:
>
> void foo(double *x) {
> if (check_if_x_is_special(&global_state)) {
> y = __builtin_assume_aligned(x, 16);
> do_something(y);
> } else
> do_something_else(x);
> }
>
> with this scheme, there is never a danger that the alignment assumption
> can be lifted and incorrectly applied to x in an inlined
> do_something_else(x)....
2008 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] Store patterns accepting i32 only?
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> I’m trying to write a store pattern that accepts both i32 and f32,
> however, when tablegen generates the code, it only generates the
> code for i32 only.
>
> def ADDR : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, "SelectADDR", [], []>;
> def MEM : Operand<i32> {
> let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand";
2013 Sep 12
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.meta (was Rotated loop identification)
...erns me about __builtin_assume_aligned and this scheme is the control dependencies. In gcc, it is the return value of the intrinsic that carries the alignment guarantee, and I think that this makes a lot of sense. Consider something like this:
void foo(double *x) {
if (check_if_x_is_special(&global_state)) {
y = __builtin_assume_aligned(x, 16);
do_something(y);
} else
do_something_else(x);
}
with this scheme, there is never a danger that the alignment assumption can be lifted and incorrectly applied to x in an inlined do_something_else(x). If we simply have the intrinsic not return a...
2017 Apr 19
4
[PATCH v2 0/2] daemon: Move the useful 'is_zero' function into common code.
v1 -> v2:
The first patch is the same (the pure refactoring), but in the second
patch I implement Eric Blake's suggested version.
Rich.
2017 Apr 19
2
[PATCH] daemon: Move the useful 'is_zero' function into common code.
...verflow.com/questions/1493936/faster-means-of-checking-for-an-empty-buffer-in-c/1493989#1493989
- */
-static inline int
-is_zero (const unsigned char *buffer, size_t size)
-{
- size_t i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
- if (buffer[i] != 0)
- return 0;
- }
-
- return 1;
-}
-
struct global_state {
/* Current iterator. Threads update this, but it is protected by a
* mutex, and each thread takes a copy of it when working on it.
@@ -681,7 +663,7 @@ worker_thread (void *vp)
/* Don't write if the block is all zero, to preserve output file
* sparseness. However we...
2023 Aug 09
8
[PATCH -next 0/7] drm: Remove many unnecessary NULL values
The NULL initialization of the pointers assigned by kzalloc() or
kunit_kzalloc() first is not necessary, because if the kzalloc() or
kunit_kzalloc() failed, the pointers will be assigned NULL, otherwise
it works as usual. so remove it.
Ruan Jinjie (7):
drm/amdkfd: Remove unnecessary NULL values
drm/amd/display: Remove unnecessary NULL values
drm/msm: Remove unnecessary NULL values
2013 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] llvm.meta (was Rotated loop identification)
On Sep 7, 2013, at 7:41 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As long as this is brainstorming time, I actually like the idea of
>> an
>> llvm.invariant intrinsic that the optimizers know to ignore. I
>> like
>> it for other
2013 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.meta (was Rotated loop identification)
----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:28 AM, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: "Andrew Trick" < atrick at
2016 Mar 06
8
[PATCH 0/5] Use less stack.
Various changes/fixes to use smaller stack frames.
Rich.
2016 Mar 07
2
[PATCH v2] Use less stack.
...strm.avail_in);
+ n = read (fd, buf, strm.avail_in);
if (n == -1)
unix_error (errno, (char *) "read", filenamev);
@@ -454,12 +459,17 @@ iter_blocks (lzma_index *idx, unsigned nr_threads,
value filenamev, int fd, value outputfilev, int ofd)
{
struct global_state global;
- struct per_thread_state per_thread[nr_threads];
- pthread_t thread[nr_threads];
+ CLEANUP_FREE struct per_thread_state *per_thread = NULL;
+ CLEANUP_FREE pthread_t *thread = NULL;
unsigned u, nr_errors;
int err;
void *status;
+ per_thread = malloc (sizeof (struct per_threa...