search for: glmultis

Dear List, I'm using glmulti for model averaging in R. There are ~10 variables in my model, making exhaustive screening impractical - I therefore need to use the genetic algorithm (GA) (call: method = "g"). I need to include random effects so I'm using glmulti as a wrapper for lme4. Methods for doing this are available here

Hello, I'm using the "glmulti" package to run models of all the possible combinations of my variables. However, I am only interested in a few interactions between my variables. I have tried the equivalent of: mod1<-lm(y~a+b+c+a:b) glmulti(mod1, level=1) mod2<-lm(y~a+b+c+a:b) glmulti(mod2, level=2) and glmulti("y", c("a", "b", "c"),

Dear R, The glmulti package no longer loads through the library() command, apparently because of a problem with rJava. I have today reinstalled R from scratch (updated to v2.14.0) and reinstalled all packages from scratch and updated them all too. The problem is the same as I found on v2.13.2. See session below for the error. I tried install.packages(rJava) as advised by the error report but it

Dear all, I have a question about the glmulti package. I want to include some variables in all models. To that end I applied the wrapper function as shown in the examples (http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/glmulti/docs/glmulti). To include the variable "Geslacht" in all models: > glm.redefined = function(formula, data, always="", ...)

Dear All, wonder if you have some thoughts on running the with() function (and perhaps including the pool() function to get the results?) in glmulti? In other words, how to run glmulti with a data set that is produced by mice()? publicly available code: data <- airquality data[4:10,3] <- rep(NA,7) data[1:5,4] <- NA data <- data[-c(5,6)] library(mice) library(glmulti) the following

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the

Dear list, I am trying to do an automated model selection of a glmm (function glmer; package: lme4) containing a large number of predictors. As far as i understand, glmulti is able to devide the process into chuncks and proceed by parallel processing on on multiple cores. Unfortunately this does not seem to work and i could not really fid any advice on the matter on other forums. Specifically i

Hello, I'm using the "glmulti" package to run models of all the possible combinations of my variables. However, I am only interested in a few interactions between them. I have tried the equivalent of: 1) mod1<-lm(y~a+b+c+a:b) glmulti(mod1, level=1) 2) mod2<-lm(y~a+b+c+a:b) glmulti(mod2, level=2) 3) glmulti("y", c("a",

All, I am working on a multiple-regression meta-analysis and have too many alternative models to fit by hand. I am using the "metafor" package in R, which generates AIC scores among other metrics. I'm using a simple formula to define these models. For example, rma(Effect_size,variance, mods=~Myco_type + N.type +total, method="ML")->mod where Effect_size is the

Dear List, I am using both the clm() and clmm() functions from the R package 'ordinal'. I am fitting an ordinal dependent variable with 5 categories to 9 continuous predictors, all of which have been normalised (mean subtracted then divided by standard deviation), using a probit link function. From this global model I am generating a confidence set of 200 models using clm() and the

I'm running r 2. on a mac running 10.6.4 and a dual-core macbook pro. I'm having a funny time with multicore. When I run it with 2 cores, mclapply, R borks with the following error. The process has forked and you cannot use this CoreFoundation functionality safely. You MUST exec(). Break on __THE_PROCESS_HAS_FORKED_AND_YOU_CANNOT_USE_THIS_COREFOUNDATION_FUNCTIONALITY___YOU_MUST_EXEC__()

...39;ve tried several approaches to this but have not succeeded, i also find virtually no record of folks trying this or any mention of how it might work. I'm hoping my failure comes from ignorance of how to call .jinit with the appropriate parameters at the right time. A simple example call all.glmultis <- llply( some.list, function.which.calls.glmulti, .paralllel=TRUE ) If i set .parallel=FALSE, the call completes and I'm able to merge the results using a glmulti command. However, when parallelizing, it never returns (even though it appears to run the separate processes simultaneously and...

Dear List, I am looking for a function that will find the best subset of negative binomial models. I have a large data set with 15 variables that I am interested in. I want an easy way to run all possible models and find a subset of the "best" models that I can then look at in more detail. I have found two functions that seem to provide what I am looking for, but am not sure which

Hi, I am trying to fi a glm-poisson model to 400.000 records. I have tried biglm and glmulti but i have problems... can it really be the case that 400.000 are too many records??? I am thinking of using random samples of my dataset..... Many thanks, -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/glm-poisson-fitting-400-000-records-tp3925100p3925100.html Sent from the R help

Hi All, Its a bit of a beginners question I'm afraid. I have a looped stepwise regression (using MASS and StepAIC) to take random predictors out of the total number. For this example a random sample of 5 out of a total of 20. The loop will continue until all combinations of variables have been run through the loop. The output from each loop can be derived from taking the significant (p)

hello all, I have a simple linear model with 4/5 variables that I am trying to fit. I would like to find the lowest AIC value with any combination of all the variables. I would like to implement this with a while/for loop. Possibly I would like to generalize this so then I can use it when I have many more variables. I do not want to use step AIC. At the moment I am doing it manually but I

2012/4/7 <r-help-es-request@r-project.org> > Envíe los mensajes para la lista R-help-es a > r-help-es@r-project.org > > Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help-es > > O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto "help" en > el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a:

A few general comments about stepwiseAIC and a suggestion of how to select models a) Apart form the problem, that stepwise selection is not a garanty to get the best model, you need to have a lot of data to avoid overfitting if your model includes 7 parameter plus interactions (> 10 observations per parameter is what you are ideally looking for). b) Have a look at Anderson and Burnham's

CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week New packages ------------ * DCGL (1.0) Bao-Hong Liu http://crantastic.org/packages/DCGL Functions for basic differential coexpression analyses: gene filtering, link filtering, DCG (Differentially-Coexpressed Gene) identification and DCL (Differentially-Coexpressed Links) identification.Two algorithms,named DCP and DCe, are provided for