search for: glibli

**OFF TOPIC** but perhaps of interest to some on this list. I apologize in advance to those who may be offended. The byline: ******************************** "ChatGPT's odds of getting code questions correct are worse than a coin flip But its suggestions are so annoyingly plausible" ************************************* from here:

The Orion echo canceller is just ok. The Tellabs units work just as well if you don't mind 10 mins of soldering. I have the orion running with an adit 600 and a TE110P. Echo cancel is fairly good, but I have loads of problems with DTMF digits. -Darren ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:42:15 +0100 mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Not much time to reply now. > > On 12/05/2017 05:21 AM, Mark Foley wrote: > > mj - thanks! That the first useful example I've received from any forum/list. I'm getting ready > > to try my config (have to do so after hours), but I have some probably simple-minded questions: >

On Dec 29, 2014, at 8:02 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > In many instances in government and business seven > years is a typical time-frame in which to get a major software system built > and installed. And I have witnessed longer. As a software developer, I think I can speak to both halves of that point. First, the world where you design, build, and

On Mon, December 29, 2014 04:22, Ned Slider wrote: > What business model do you have that you > can't build around a product guaranteed to be consistent/supported for > the next 10 years? Well, despite the hype from Wall St., Bay St. and The City, a large number of organisations in the world run on software that is decades old and cannot be economically replaced. In many instances

Hi everyone, Nick and Philip suggested something yesterday that I'd also thought about: supporting attributes on values (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140908/234323.html). The primary motivation for this is to provide a way of attaching pointer information, such as noalias, nonnull and dereferenceable(n), to pointers generated by loads. Doing this for pointers

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > As a software developer, I think I can speak to both halves of that point. > > First, the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. Lots of free services that call everything they release

On Dec 29, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. > > Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. How did you jump from incremental feature

On 12/29/2014 09:04 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. >> Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >>> >>> the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. >> >> Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. > > How did you jump from incremental feature roll-outs to data loss? There is no necessary connection there.