search for: glibly

**OFF TOPIC** but perhaps of interest to some on this list. I apologize in advance to those who may be offended. The byline: ******************************** "ChatGPT's odds of getting code questions correct are worse than a coin flip But its suggestions are so annoyingly plausible" ************************************* from here:

...possible look at an external dedicated canceller like www.oriontelecom.com VCL-E1 ECHO CANCELLER (1U Version) ? $1295 Rob On 2/11/06, asterisk@anime.net <asterisk@anime.net> wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Rob Lith wrote: > It claims to have "carrier-grade algorithms" - don't glibly translate that > to carrier grade hardware, it's a PCI card... What echo canceller hardware do you recommend for an asterisk PC? -Dan _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or updat...

...t. > > Plus: read some dovecot/ad howto's, and try things in your own environment. > > Quick google returns: > https://www.howtoforge.com/postfix-dovecot-authentication-against-active-directory-on-centos-5.x > I know my level of sophistication on this must sound like I've glibly posted a question hoping someone will do the work for me without my having to do any thinking myself, but believe me, I've been reading and experimenting with this for a very long time. I've got internal AD authentication working with GSSAPI and I've got a rather complex checkpassword...

...is the way I?ve been developing software for decades, as have a great many others. Waterfall is dead, hallelujah! Second, there is no necessary tie between OS and software systems built on top of it. If your software only runs on one specific OS version, you?re doing it wrong. I don?t mean that glibly. I mean you have made a fundamental mistake if your system breaks badly enough due to an OS change that you can?t fix it within an iteration or two of your normal development process. The most likely mistake is staffing your team entirely with people who have never been through a platform shift b...

On Mon, December 29, 2014 04:22, Ned Slider wrote: > What business model do you have that you > can't build around a product guaranteed to be consistent/supported for > the next 10 years? Well, despite the hype from Wall St., Bay St. and The City, a large number of organisations in the world run on software that is decades old and cannot be economically replaced. In many instances

Hi everyone, Nick and Philip suggested something yesterday that I'd also thought about: supporting attributes on values (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140908/234323.html). The primary motivation for this is to provide a way of attaching pointer information, such as noalias, nonnull and dereferenceable(n), to pointers generated by loads. Doing this for pointers

...This is the way I?ve been developing software for decades, as have a great many others. Waterfall is dead, hallelujah! > How many people do you have answering the phone about the wild and crazy changes you are introducing weekly? How much does it cost to train them? > I don?t mean that glibly. I mean you have made a fundamental mistake if your system breaks badly enough due to an OS change that you can?t fix it within an iteration or two of your normal development process. The most likely mistake is staffing your team entirely with people who have never been through a platform shift b...

.... How often do most people get trained to use a word processor? I?ll bet a lot of people got trained just once, in grade school. They just cope with changes as they come. The worst changes are when you skip many versions. Word 97 to Word 2007, for example. *shudder* >> I don?t mean that glibly. I mean you have made a fundamental mistake if your system breaks badly enough due to an OS change that you can?t fix it within an iteration or two of your normal development process. The most likely mistake is staffing your team entirely with people who have never been through a platform shift b...

...ost people get trained to use a word processor? I?ll bet a lot of people got trained just once, in grade school. They just cope with changes as they come. > > The worst changes are when you skip many versions. Word 97 to Word 2007, for example. *shudder* > >>> I don?t mean that glibly. I mean you have made a fundamental mistake if your system breaks badly enough due to an OS change that you can?t fix it within an iteration or two of your normal development process. The most likely mistake is staffing your team entirely with people who have never been through a platform shift b...

...Something might break every few months, which sounds bad until you consider that the alternative is for *everything* to break at the same time, every 3-7 years. When your system requires extensive testing, the few times it breaks the better. Never would be nice... >>> I don?t mean that glibly. I mean you have made a fundamental mistake if your system breaks badly enough due to an OS change that you can?t fix it within an iteration or two of your normal development process. The most likely mistake is staffing your team entirely with people who have never been through a platform shift b...