search for: gfx0

...x (0x000000003) is beyond end of object (length 0x0) (20131218/exoparg2-420) [ 24.104056] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.VGA_._DSM] (Node ffff88007c82e1e0), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT (20131218/psparse-536) [ 24.104133] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P4.GFX0._DSM] (Node ffff88007c82e050), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT (20131218/psparse-536) [ 24.104247] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P4.GFX0: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x300b) [ 24.108761] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0007) [ 24.135000] [drm] hdmi device not found 4 0 1 [ 24.135950] nouveau D[...

...: GUID detected in BIOS [ 2.647107] ACPI Error: Needed [Buffer/String/Package], found [Integer] ffff88023ee2c510 (20120320/exresop-590) [ 2.647112] ACPI Exception: AEAML_OPERAND_TYPE, While resolving operands for OpcodeName unavailable [ 2.647118] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed _SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM, AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE (20120320/psparse-536) [ 2.647129] failed to evaluate _DSM: 12291 [ 2.647229] ACPI Error: Needed [Buffer/String/Package], found [Integer] ffff88023ee2c510 (20120320/exresop-590) [ 2.647233] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE, While resolving operands for OpcodeName unavai...

..., to rule out issues with delays:) Disable rpm for the Nvidia device (control = on). 4. modprobe nouveau. The above test with v4.6 + 4 pci/pm patches (8b71f565) gives: 50.245795 MXM: GUID detected in BIOS 50.245948 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM] at AML address ffffc90000013b11 length 492 50.246016 ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20160108/nsarguments-95) 50.246044 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM] at AML addre...

...Disable rpm for the > Nvidia device (control = on). > 4. modprobe nouveau. > > The above test with v4.6 + 4 pci/pm patches (8b71f565) gives: > > 50.245795 MXM: GUID detected in BIOS > 50.245948 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM] at AML address ffffc90000013b11 length 492 > 50.246016 ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20160108/nsarguments-95) > 50.246044 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM] at...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76475 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau fails to load due to unknown opcode 0x80 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: patrick.clara at

...> access from userspace: > > Sep 30 17:24:42 kernel: pci_raw_set_power_state: 56 callbacks suppressed > > and for some reason it does not get resumed properly. There are also few > warnings from ACPI that might be relevant: > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > afaik this is the case for ess...

So a new thinkpad: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1) Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with [ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00.0: optimus capabilit...

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:03:27PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > nouveau_drm_load() calls pm_runtime_put() if nouveau_runtime_pm != 0, > but nouveau_drm_unload() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() unconditionally. > We therefore leak a runtime pm ref whenever nouveau is loaded with > runpm=0 and then unloaded. The GPU will subsequently never runtime > suspend even if nouveau is loaded again

...ed by ACPI ------ ~/Documents $ dmesg|grep DSM [ 4.205710] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20141107/nsarguments-95) [ 4.205724] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU: failed to evaluate _DSM [ 4.205739] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20141107/nsarguments-95) [ 4.205749] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0: failed to evaluate _DSM On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > Does the Nvidia card auto-suspends or d...

...er]) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:1050] (rev ff) (prog-if ff) At the moment, not being able to use optimus technology I compiled acpi_call (from 24/06/11) for my kernel and set this in /etc/rc.d/rc.local /sbin/modprobe acpi_call echo '\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.GFX0.DOFF' > /proc/acpi/call Also, due to some video problems for which I don't know if a possible con-cause could be both nouveau and i915 kernel modules loaded, I put in my grub.conf settings so that $ cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 root=UUID=ce058d6c-d2ed-4...

...sirkin wrote: > > So a new thinkpad: > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1) > > > > Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily enough with > > > > [ 3.971515] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) > > [ 3.971553] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20181003/nsarguments-66) > > [ 3.971721] pci 0000:01:00....

...:42 kernel: pci_raw_set_power_state: 56 callbacks suppressed > > > > > > and for some reason it does not get resumed properly. There are also few > > > warnings from ACPI that might be relevant: > > > > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > > > afaik...

...SM >> [ 4.205710] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type >> mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >> (20141107/nsarguments-95) >> [ 4.205724] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU: failed to evaluate _DSM >> [ 4.205739] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 >> type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >> (20141107/nsarguments-95) >> [ 4.205749] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0: failed to evaluate _DSM >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Pierre Moreau >> <pierre.morrow at free.fr&gt...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70875 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70875 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVC0] NOUVEAU(0): [drm] failed to set drm interface version QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

...:42 kernel: pci_raw_set_power_state: 56 callbacks suppressed > > > > > > and for some reason it does not get resumed properly. There are also few > > > warnings from ACPI that might be relevant: > > > > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > > > > &...

...CI0.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type >>>>> mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >>>>> (20141107/nsarguments-95) >>>>> [ 4.205724] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU: failed to evaluate _DSM >>>>> [ 4.205739] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 >>>>> type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] >>>>> (20141107/nsarguments-95) >>>>> [ 4.205749] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0: failed to evaluate _DSM >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:1...

still happens with your patch applied. The machine simply gets shut down. dmesg can be found here: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/karolherbst/40eb091c7b7b33ef993525de660f1a3b/raw/2380e31f566e93e5ba7c87ef545420965d4c492c/gistfile1.txt If there are no other things to try out, I will post the updated patch shortly. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:29 AM Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at

...abilities: pci upgrade shadowing cdboot bootselect socketedrom edd int13floppy1200 int13floppy720 int13floppy2880 int5printscreen int9keyboard int14serial int17printer acpi usb biosbootspecification uefi *-pci:0 description: Host bridge product: RD890 PCI to PCI bridge (external gfx0 port B) vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] physical id: 100 bus info: pci at 0000:00:00.0 version: 02 width: 32 bits clock: 33MHz ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *-core...

...ntact: xorg-team at lists.x.org The laptop has NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 960M discrete chip at PCI:01:00.0 01:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM107M [GeForce GTX 960M] (rev a2) Using 4.8.1 kernel, here is dmesg of "modprobe nouveau debug=spam": [ 4620.345670] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20160422/nsarguments-95) [ 4620.345756] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20160422/nsarguments-95) [ 4620.345862] ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._...

...ments $ dmesg|grep DSM > [ 4.205710] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU._DSM: Argument #4 type > mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] > (20141107/nsarguments-95) > [ 4.205724] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IGPU: failed to evaluate _DSM > [ 4.205739] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 > type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] > (20141107/nsarguments-95) > [ 4.205749] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.GFX0: failed to evaluate _DSM > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Pierre Moreau > <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > > Does...