search for: gfortan

I have been revising some FORTRAN 77 routines in R packages I have previously submitted. Since R is now using gfortan I experimented with some Fortran 90 code (array intrinsics primarily). So far the code is still in F77 fixed format, in files suffixed .f (not .f90), but incorporates some F90 constructs. It has worked fine in linux/R. I tried to follow the thread of previous discussions on this subject, but...

Chris Lattner wrote: > Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Here are two typos I noticed: s/improvmenets/improvements/ s/GFortan/GFortran/ -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

Hi All, Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change the document. The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now! Thanks! -Chris

...really cool... because GCC is really friendly to people doing research for various reasons. Also, the Fortran-to-C translation is only a temporary solution. Being able to use GCC as a whole for all SPEC benchmarks would be a great plus. If you can give me more specific details on how to test gfortan to emit llvm bytecode, I'll be glad to try it. I'm not all that familiar with LLVM at all, but if I can find the time (which I won't in the next few weeks), I'll be glad to help. greetings, Kenneth -- Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but wha...

...gt;> into. I'm not aware of anyone doing this, though it's probably not hard. >> > > So, in the future it will be possible to use gcc/g++/gfortran to generate > LLVM bytecode? Yes, if someone does the work. > If you can give me more specific details on how to test gfortan to emit llvm > bytecode, I'll be glad to try it. I'm not all that familiar with LLVM at all, > but if I can find the time (which I won't in the next few weeks), I'll be > glad to help. I don't have any specific details to give you, as I haven't tried it before....

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark > suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem > I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is > already available it seems (using f2c). ok. > Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 >

Hello LLVM-people, I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is already available it seems (using f2c). Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).