Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "getfmul".
Did you mean:
getfacl
2014 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] More careful treatment of floating point exceptions
Hi Sanjay,
Thanks, I saw this flag and it's definitely should be considered, but
it appeared to me to be static characteristic of target platform. I'm
not sure how appropriate it would be to change its value from a front-end.
It says "Has", while optional flag would rather say "Uses" meaning that
implementation cares about floating point exceptions.
Regards,
Sergey
2014 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] More careful treatment of floating point exceptions
...S));
}
Constant *CreateMul(Constant *LHS, Constant *RHS,
- bool HasNUW = false, bool HasNSW = false) const {
- return Fold(ConstantExpr::getMul(LHS, RHS, HasNUW, HasNSW));
- }
- Constant *CreateFMul(Constant *LHS, Constant *RHS) const {
- return Fold(ConstantExpr::getFMul(LHS, RHS));
+ bool HasNUW = false, bool HasNSW = false,
+ bool HonorFPExceptions = false) const {
+ return Fold(ConstantExpr::getMul(LHS, RHS, HasNUW, HasNSW,
+ HonorFPExceptions));
+ }
+ Constant *CreateFMul(Constan...
2011 Feb 04
3
[LLVMdev] ConstantBuilder proposal
...onstant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getSub(C1, C2);
}
static Constant *GetFSub(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getFSub(C1, C2);
}
static Constant *GetMul(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getMul(C1, C2);
}
static Constant *GetFMul(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getFMul(C1, C2);
}
static Constant *GetUDiv(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getUDiv(C1, C2);
}
static Constant *GetSDiv(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) {
return ConstantExpr::getSDiv(C1, C2);
}
static Const...