search for: getfacls

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the

> > On the file serever: > > Collected config --- 2019-07-03-10:27 ----------- > > > > Hostname: srv > > DNS Domain: a.b.hu > > FQDN: srv.a.b.hu > > ipaddress: 10.0.3.15 192.168.0.8 > > ----------- > > Samba is running as a Unix domain member > > ----------- > > > > This computer is running Debian 10.0 x86_64 > >

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

On 2017-04-23 17:01, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:07:44 +1000 > Henry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Following: >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs >> >> In windows: >> >> I can set permissions under the "Share Permissions" tab. >> >> I am

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

On 2019-02-19 3:05 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:44:05 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > >> >> >> # user administrator workaround >> >> username map = /etc/samba/user.map >> > >> > Just to check, what is in the user.map ? >> >> root at

Hi, A nice problem came up. If I want to set directory permissions with getfacl or ls -la that directory or wbinfo --uid-info winbind is dieing and I got this error message in samba.log: ==> samba/samba.log <== [2013/05/30 15:03:31, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:72(fault_report) =============================================================== [2013/05/30 15:03:31, 0]

Hi Rowland, list, On 20-6-2016 20:04, Rowland penny wrote: > If you are using Sernet 4.4.4 packages, you must have a Sernet > subscription, you may get quicker help there. Well I'm not sure this kind of support is included, but even if it were, then others would not benefit from the dialogue with their support. :-) > I was wrong, if you are using 4.2.0 or later, you do not need to

Dear All I am facing a strange problem that I could not solve, so, maybe you can help me. Look at this situation: I created a new directory with those ACLs (through Samba using Windows XP) [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl teste #file:teste #owner:1002 #group:1006 user::rwx group::rwx group:suporte:rwx group:administ:rwx mask::rwx other::--- [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl -d teste

I have Samba 3.0.2a running on Solaris 8 compiled with winbind and authenticating against an NT domain. every time I run a "ls -l" or "getfacl" the command line hangs as it's tries to pull down all the user/group details from the domain. I heard this may have something to do with nscd (nameservice cache daemon?) which is running on the solaris machine. Any thoughts

> Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> hat am 30. März 2017 um 16:46 geschrieben: > If you look here: > > drwxrwx---+ 2 RUBENS\gf root 4096 Mär 30 14:09 gf > > There is a '+' sign after the permissions, this means that there are > ACLs set on the directory, try running 'getfacl /fs/gf' Ok, first /fs/mrtx, then /fs/gf: root at fs:~# getfacl /fs/mrtx

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gary Dale <garydale at torfree.net> wrote: They already have full rwx privileges. I'm not sure if that worked or not, > or if it was something else I've done since last night but currently the > profiles seem to being saved even without the share being connected. > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

hello, My 2nd issue is about acls which are added by "Domain users". May you help me to solve it again ? Concerning this issue, on my samba share, I set permissions for the share "groups" located on /var/datashared for "domain admins" (rwx) and "domain users" (r-x) /var]# getfacl datashared/ # file: datashared/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx

Hi, I have a samba server (version 3.0.28). I have joined my server to my domain with no problems. Since I will have postfix in my machine, (to relay mails externally) I configured my /etc/resolv.conf with my external dns first and later my internal dns. The problem is that when I try to apply acl permissions on some folder (using setfacl) I cannot see the trusted domains, If I comment out the

Hi everyone I have these shares in smb.conf: [home2] path = /home2 read only = No [home] path = /home2/home read only = No I mount [home] on a Linux client like this: mount -t cifs //hh1/home2 /home2 -osec=krb5,rw,multiuser Here is the output of the mount command: //hh1/home2 on /home2 type cifs

I've been playing with filesystem ACLs and wanted to integrate that with Samba to create a more transparent end user experiance. I have set up and tested a JFS partition with ACL support. I can use getfacl and setfacl with no problems to set permissions as needed. It works great. I compiled Samba with ACL support using the --with-acl configure option. Unfortunately I can't seem to

On 2017-04-23 17:19, Henry via samba wrote: > On 2017-04-23 17:01, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:07:44 +1000 >> Henry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Following: >>> >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs >>> >>> In windows: >>> >>> I

Hai, Now, i did not know you used the DC for the profiles here but yes it looks good. Small comment on point 3 and 4. 3) Its good, you might notice a few more rights there compaired to what i posted, thats because you have your profiles on the DC but the settings are good. 4) yes, the security is ok, i like the higher security setting and try to mimic the windows settings as much as

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13820 Bug ID: 13820 Summary: rsync is not preserving ACLs Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter: dinesh.k at