search for: getchars

I found these lines in the BrainF example: //declare i32 @getchar() getchar_func = cast<Function>(module-> getOrInsertFunction("getchar", IntegerType::getInt32Ty(C), NULL)); //declare i32 @putchar(i32) putchar_func = cast<Function>(module-> getOrInsertFunction("putchar", IntegerType::getInt32Ty(C),

Hello, i have ported the BCP (Bride Control Protocol) patch for pppd 2.4.1 mentioned in http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/2004-September/000619.html to pppd 2.4.2. The kernel patch still works without problems with kernel 2.4.30. Perhaps someone else could use this patch ... Here again some documentation i have found about the BCP patch somewere else: When pppd negotiates BCP, it tells

Hello, Iam facing a problem in locking of files across samba shares. We have samba 3.0.10 running on Solaris 9 with the smb.conf as follows. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NMUINT netbios name = NMUINTFS interfaces = <IP> bind interfaces only = Yes security = DOMAIN password server = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX log level = 1 ldap

Dear Sir, I was trying to install bridge as we are installing scps gateway in our testbed.This requires us to install the bridge. Our Linux version is 2.4.18 ~3 and we are using redhat 7.2 Please let me know which is the bridge I should install and how to configure it. Before configuring the bridge what I should check in my configuration. Thanks for your time, Sincerely Rama ===== I hear

Author: muffin Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: fecd74c42540dbb707f29987c4b4e10ecff69818 Log message: 6266832 UNIX98/UNIX03: getc(), getchar(), putc(), putchar() did not set stream to byte orientation Files: update: usr/src/head/iso/stdio_iso.h

Hello! I get some odd behaviour using my structs: "myKernelMap" = type {int (sbyte*)*, int ()*} "Kernel" = type {"myKernelMap"*} The second member ( int()* ) is a pointer to the %getchar() function. I want to call getchar using this function: int "callmyKernelgetchar_kernel"("Kernel"* "myKernel") { "PTRMAP" =

This code is undefined, meaning that all bets are off, don't do it. I.e. It reads the value of I between two sequence points and uses it for something other than determining the value written. From: Csaba Raduly Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:44 AM To: Joe Armstrong Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? Hi Joe On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Joe

Anders Alexandersson wrote: > Hello! > > I get some odd behaviour using my structs: > > "myKernelMap" = type {int (sbyte*)*, int ()*} > "Kernel" = type {"myKernelMap"*} > > The second member ( int()* ) is a pointer to the %getchar() function. > > I want to call getchar using this function: > > int

Hi, Hans > Since getchar and putchar are never defined, I'm assuming they are > intrinsics, but they are not documented with the rest of the intrinsics. So > are they intrinsics or something else? I _guess_ standard functions like getchar/putchar are linked by default. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica,

Hi, For some time now I have been using pxelinux to add a helpful 'administrator' boot mode to our workstations with the following 'pxelinux.cfg/default' config: ---- DEFAULT local PROMPT 0 TIMEOUT 0 TOTALTIMEOUT 1 ONTIMEOUT menu ALLOWOPTIONS 0 NOESCAPE 0 LABEL local LOCALBOOT 0 LABEL menu CONFIG /pxelinux.cfg/default-menu ---- This is great as by

So... Are 40 and 41 the only legal behaviors or are there more? Robby On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, Ahmed Charles <ahmedcharles at gmail.com> wrote: > This code is undefined, meaning that all bets are off, don't do it. > I.e. It reads the value of I between two sequence points and uses it > for something other than determining the value written. From: Csaba > Raduly >

On 05/12/2011 11:08 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, Hans > >> Since getchar and putchar are never defined, I'm assuming they are >> intrinsics, but they are not documented with the rest of the intrinsics. So >> are they intrinsics or something else? > > I _guess_ standard functions like getchar/putchar are linked by > default. Indeed, they're coming from libc. The

I have released SYSLINUX 1.73-pre1. This isn't a bug fix release (thank God), but given the rather painful quality of the last couple of releases I wanted to get another prerelease out as I'm working on the new core code. I'm trying to eliminate differences between the various syslinux components whereever possible; there has been some unnecessary differences in the past which

Hello hpa, We are developing a Xen-based virtualization service, and we are trying to reduce excessive CPU utilization at isolinux boot prompts. When users boot up a virtual machine on an isolinux boot CD, the CPU starts spinning at 100%. These machines frequently get left in this state for days or weeks, degrading the service for everyone else. You replied to the work-around discussed in

Hello, Is this a bug in clang, or a bug in my thinking? /Joe Armstrong /* When I compile the following program I get different answers in clang and gcc. $ gcc bug2.c $ ./a.out j = 40 $ clang bug2.c $ ./a.out j = 41 I think the correct answer is 41. If my understanding of C is correct (which, or course, it might not be) the incremented value of i++ is first made available

I am new to llvm so I might be missing a critical step. My system is Fedora 12 but this also happens in Mac OS X 10.6.2. Here are the steps I used to compile llvm: export TARGETS=x86,x86_64,cpp export INSTALLDIR=/home/rovitotv/llvm ../llvm-2.6/configure --prefix=$INSTALLDIR --enable-bindings=none --enable-targets=$TARGETS --enable-optimized --with-llvmgccdir=$INSTALLDIR

First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it doesn't matter here. I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us the link, so that we can download it. The problem is that TheExecutionEngine is set to NULL (maybe because of a previous error), but it will be really better if you use pastebin. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Todd Rovito

Hi Tim, as always thanks for your help. Unfortunately I made a mistake in my email but apart from that I still have problems. Il giorno sab 27 lug 2019 alle ore 11:53 Tim Northover < t.p.northover at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Alberto, > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 10:09, Alberto Barbaro via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Having the reference I to

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it > doesn't matter here. I got the compile command from the Kaleidoscope documentation. > I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us > the link, so that we can download it. The

Hello all, I was under the impression that llvm-gcc (and g++) could be used as a standin for plain gcc, without any extra options needed on the command-line. Is this correct? If so, then I'm at a loss why I get the linking errors below when using llvm-gcc compared to a successful gcc build. The multiply defined symbols reported all seem to come from <stdlib.h> Any clues? Thanks, Paul