search for: gccbase

...ble the lld in my Uefi firmware build to replace ld, and I found it is related to the wrong symbol values in the .data section, which are pointed by R_X86_64_64 relocation entries. I need your advices. My firmware uses a linker script https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds to do the linking. We use position independent code with hidden visibility to inform the compiler that symbol references are never resolved at runtime. My problem is I found after the lld linking with -pie enabled, the symbol values in .data section, which have the R_X86_64_64 relocation entrie...

...ble the lld in my Uefi firmware build to replace ld, and I found it is related to the wrong symbol values in the .data section, which are pointed by R_X86_64_64 relocation entries. I need your advices. My firmware uses a linker script https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds to do the linking. We use position independent code with hidden visibility to inform the compiler that symbol references are never resolved at runtime. My problem is I found after the lld linking with –pie enabled, the symbol values in .data section, which have the R_X86_64_64 relocation entrie...

...ble the lld in my Uefi firmware build to replace ld, and I found it is related to the wrong symbol values in the .data section, which are pointed by R_X86_64_64 relocation entries. I need your advices. My firmware uses a linker script https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds to do the linking. We use position independent code with hidden visibility to inform the compiler that symbol references are never resolved at runtime. My problem is I found after the lld linking with –pie enabled, the symbol values in .data section, which have the R_X86_64_64 relocation entrie...