search for: gcc_prod__i386

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "gcc_prod__i386".

2011 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. Ciao, Duncan. On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03 > Previous 331 0 2011-10-11 06:59...
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...he results were completely reproducible. On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >> >> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results >> >> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ >> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 >> Name curlew.apple.com >> >> Run ID Order Start Time End Time >> Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03 >&g...
2011 Jul 25
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob, >> A big compile time regression. Any ideas? >> >> Ciao, Duncan. > > False alarm. For some reason that I have not yet been able to figure out, these tests run significantly more slowly when I run them during the daytime, which I did for that run. I checked a few of the worst regressions reported here and they all recovered in subsequent runs. here is a crazy
2011 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...ests run significantly more slowly when I run them during the daytime, which I did for that run. I checked a few of the worst regressions reported here and they all recovered in subsequent runs. > > On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >> >> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results >> >> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/ >> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 >> Name curlew.apple.com >> >> Run ID Order Start Time End Time >> Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04 2011-07-22 17:13:53 >&g...
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
A big compile time regression. Any ideas? Ciao, Duncan. On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04 2011-07-22 17:13:53 > Previous 252 0 2011-07-20 07:01...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380 0 2011-12-01 07:59:12 2011-12-01 08:42:06 > Previous 379 0 2011-11-30 08:13...