Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "gcc_prod__i386".
2011 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
> Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03
> Previous 331 0 2011-10-11 06:59...
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...he results were completely reproducible.
On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
> On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>>
>> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>>
>> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/
>> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
>> Name curlew.apple.com
>>
>> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
>> Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03
>&g...
2011 Jul 25
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob,
>> A big compile time regression. Any ideas?
>>
>> Ciao, Duncan.
>
> False alarm. For some reason that I have not yet been able to figure out, these tests run significantly more slowly when I run them during the daytime, which I did for that run. I checked a few of the worst regressions reported here and they all recovered in subsequent runs.
here is a crazy
2011 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...ests run significantly more slowly when I run them during the daytime, which I did for that run. I checked a few of the worst regressions reported here and they all recovered in subsequent runs.
>
> On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>>
>> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>>
>> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/
>> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
>> Name curlew.apple.com
>>
>> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
>> Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04 2011-07-22 17:13:53
>&g...
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
A big compile time regression. Any ideas?
Ciao, Duncan.
On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
> Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04 2011-07-22 17:13:53
> Previous 252 0 2011-07-20 07:01...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad!
Ciao, Duncan.
On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
> Current 380 0 2011-12-01 07:59:12 2011-12-01 08:42:06
> Previous 379 0 2011-11-30 08:13...