Duncan Sands
2011-Oct-12 08:24 UTC
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. Ciao, Duncan. On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:> > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03 > Previous 331 0 2011-10-11 06:59:18 2011-10-11 07:41:45 > > > Tests Summary > > Status Group # > Performance Regressions 17 > Performance Improvements 6 > Added Tests 2 > Unchanged Tests 938 > *Total Tests* *963* > > > Changes Detail > > Performance Regressions Δ Previous Current σ > MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha.exec 12.07% 3.5424 3.9698 0.0002 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm.exec 11.38% 2.2970 2.5585 0.0007 > External/SPEC/CFP2000/179_art/179_art.exec 10.95% 1.4190 1.5744 0.0013 > MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.exec 6.81% 11.8149 12.6195 0.0267 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng.exec 5.72% 6.0263 6.3711 0.0076 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.exec 3.98% 29.8022 30.9869 0.0810 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1.exec 3.88% 2.0729 2.1534 > 0.0010 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.exec 2.68% 10.3792 10.6571 0.0138 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/164_gzip/164_gzip.exec 2.64% 13.4866 13.8424 0.0737 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr.exec 2.61% 4.5220 4.6399 0.0007 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/197_parser/197_parser.compile 2.21% 3.1692 3.2392 0.0075 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim.exec 1.97% 6.1997 6.3219 0.0004 > MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3.exec 1.30% 4.6635 4.7241 0.0028 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.compile 1.26% 45.2907 45.8608 0.0695 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/483_xalancbmk/483_xalancbmk.compile 1.25% 223.7703 > 226.5641 0.1639 > External/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex.compile 1.04% 30.5935 30.9124 0.0283 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench.exec 1.00% 12.0546 12.1754 0.0049 > > Performance Improvements Δ Previous Current σ > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench.exec -8.84% 2.0834 1.8992 0.0050 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench.exec -5.17% 9.5375 9.0445 0.0241 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/456_hmmer/456_hmmer.exec -2.78% 5.3663 5.2169 0.0008 > MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua.exec -2.50% 28.8779 28.1550 0.0036 > External/Povray/povray.exec -1.73% 4.3798 4.3040 0.0271 > MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda.exec -1.56% 6.6249 6.5214 0.0019 > > Added Tests > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.compile > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.exec > > > > _______________________________________________ > llvm-testresults mailing list > llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
Bob Wilson
2011-Oct-12 16:03 UTC
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Yes, they are real. I re-ran the two tests with the biggest execution time regressions, and the results were completely reproducible. On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:> Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >> >> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results >> >> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ >> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 >> Name curlew.apple.com >> >> Run ID Order Start Time End Time >> Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03 >> Previous 331 0 2011-10-11 06:59:18 2011-10-11 07:41:45 >> >> >> Tests Summary >> >> Status Group # >> Performance Regressions 17 >> Performance Improvements 6 >> Added Tests 2 >> Unchanged Tests 938 >> *Total Tests* *963* >> >> >> Changes Detail >> >> Performance Regressions Δ Previous Current σ >> MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha.exec 12.07% 3.5424 3.9698 0.0002 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm.exec 11.38% 2.2970 2.5585 0.0007 >> External/SPEC/CFP2000/179_art/179_art.exec 10.95% 1.4190 1.5744 0.0013 >> MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.exec 6.81% 11.8149 12.6195 0.0267 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng.exec 5.72% 6.0263 6.3711 0.0076 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.exec 3.98% 29.8022 30.9869 0.0810 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1.exec 3.88% 2.0729 2.1534 >> 0.0010 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.exec 2.68% 10.3792 10.6571 0.0138 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/164_gzip/164_gzip.exec 2.64% 13.4866 13.8424 0.0737 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr.exec 2.61% 4.5220 4.6399 0.0007 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/197_parser/197_parser.compile 2.21% 3.1692 3.2392 0.0075 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim.exec 1.97% 6.1997 6.3219 0.0004 >> MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3.exec 1.30% 4.6635 4.7241 0.0028 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.compile 1.26% 45.2907 45.8608 0.0695 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/483_xalancbmk/483_xalancbmk.compile 1.25% 223.7703 >> 226.5641 0.1639 >> External/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex.compile 1.04% 30.5935 30.9124 0.0283 >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench.exec 1.00% 12.0546 12.1754 0.0049 >> >> Performance Improvements Δ Previous Current σ >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench.exec -8.84% 2.0834 1.8992 0.0050 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench.exec -5.17% 9.5375 9.0445 0.0241 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/456_hmmer/456_hmmer.exec -2.78% 5.3663 5.2169 0.0008 >> MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua.exec -2.50% 28.8779 28.1550 0.0036 >> External/Povray/povray.exec -1.73% 4.3798 4.3040 0.0271 >> MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda.exec -1.56% 6.6249 6.5214 0.0019 >> >> Added Tests >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.compile >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.exec >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> llvm-testresults mailing list >> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults >
Evan Cheng
2011-Oct-13 18:48 UTC
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
If I were to guess, I would say it's due to machine LICM changes. Although I can't understand why the regressions are not showing up on Clang testers. Evan On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Bob Wilson wrote:> Yes, they are real. I re-ran the two tests with the biggest execution time regressions, and the results were completely reproducible. > > On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious. >> >> Ciao, Duncan. >> >> On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >>> >>> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results >>> >>> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/ >>> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 >>> Name curlew.apple.com >>> >>> Run ID Order Start Time End Time >>> Current 332 0 2011-10-12 06:59:18 2011-10-12 07:42:03 >>> Previous 331 0 2011-10-11 06:59:18 2011-10-11 07:41:45 >>> >>> >>> Tests Summary >>> >>> Status Group # >>> Performance Regressions 17 >>> Performance Improvements 6 >>> Added Tests 2 >>> Unchanged Tests 938 >>> *Total Tests* *963* >>> >>> >>> Changes Detail >>> >>> Performance Regressions Δ Previous Current σ >>> MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha.exec 12.07% 3.5424 3.9698 0.0002 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm.exec 11.38% 2.2970 2.5585 0.0007 >>> External/SPEC/CFP2000/179_art/179_art.exec 10.95% 1.4190 1.5744 0.0013 >>> MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.exec 6.81% 11.8149 12.6195 0.0267 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng.exec 5.72% 6.0263 6.3711 0.0076 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.exec 3.98% 29.8022 30.9869 0.0810 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1.exec 3.88% 2.0729 2.1534 >>> 0.0010 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.exec 2.68% 10.3792 10.6571 0.0138 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2000/164_gzip/164_gzip.exec 2.64% 13.4866 13.8424 0.0737 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr.exec 2.61% 4.5220 4.6399 0.0007 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2000/197_parser/197_parser.compile 2.21% 3.1692 3.2392 0.0075 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim.exec 1.97% 6.1997 6.3219 0.0004 >>> MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3.exec 1.30% 4.6635 4.7241 0.0028 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.compile 1.26% 45.2907 45.8608 0.0695 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/483_xalancbmk/483_xalancbmk.compile 1.25% 223.7703 >>> 226.5641 0.1639 >>> External/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex.compile 1.04% 30.5935 30.9124 0.0283 >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench.exec 1.00% 12.0546 12.1754 0.0049 >>> >>> Performance Improvements Δ Previous Current σ >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench.exec -8.84% 2.0834 1.8992 0.0050 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench.exec -5.17% 9.5375 9.0445 0.0241 >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/456_hmmer/456_hmmer.exec -2.78% 5.3663 5.2169 0.0008 >>> MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua.exec -2.50% 28.8779 28.1550 0.0036 >>> External/Povray/povray.exec -1.73% 4.3798 4.3040 0.0271 >>> MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda.exec -1.56% 6.6249 6.5214 0.0019 >>> >>> Added Tests >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.compile >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM.exec >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> llvm-testresults mailing list >>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults >> > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results