search for: gateway1

...ot; <sip:3002@<asterisk ip>:5060;transport=udp>;tag=24957277 To: "3002" <sip:3002@<asterisk ip>:5060;transport=udp> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.54:5060;branch=z9hG4bK850e4d5c6ff86d8844678ba62b0e89aa Max-Forwards: 70 Expires: 3600 Contact: "3002" <sip:<gateway1>:5060;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 10 headers, 0 lines Using latest request as basis request Sending to 172.16.1.54 : 5060 (non-NAT) Transmitting (NAT): SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.54:5060;branch=z9hG4bK850e4d5c6ff86d8844678ba62b0e89aa;received=<gateway1> From: &q...

I am not sure why I am getting this message, I have an outbound route that goes to asterisk gateway1 then asterisk gateway2 When all lines on asterisk gateway1 are full, I get the message " all our circuits are busy now" then few second later, the phone rings, going to the second route! And the call can be established, how can I get rid of this message?? thanks -------------- next...

Hello I have the following problem: LAN<--->LINUX_ROUTER<--> 2 internet gateways gateway1: adsl gateway2: ppp connection I want the following Machines from LAN going to Internet tcp port 80 :-> gateway1 Machines from LAN goint to Internet tcp port 22 :-> gateway2 Everything else: -> gateway1 How can I acomplish this? I am using kernel 2.4.24 Can I combine dead gateway dete...

...raffic of the routing box be categorized as well), but trying to solve it, I came up with another solution, which seems simpler.The idea is to use something like this: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IPT=/sbin/iptables PORT_LIST="22 53" GATEWAY1=192.168.10.1 GATEWAY2=192.168.100.1 for PORT in $PORT_LIST do $IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 \ -p tcp --dport $PORT -j SNAT --to-source $GATEWAY2 done $IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source $GATEWAY1 -----------------------------------------------------------...

....sip.us contact_user=sonny retry_interval=60 forbidden_retry_interval=600 expiration=3600 [sonnyGW1_auth] type=auth auth_type=userpass password=somepassword username=sonny realm=gw1.sip.us [sonnyGW1] type=aor contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 [sonnyGW1] type=endpoint transport=transport-udp context=gateway1 allow=!all,ulaw outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth aors=sonnyGW1 [sonnyGW1] type=identify endpoint=sonnyGW1 match=65.254.44.194 My extensions.conf stub for the appropriate section looks like this (from https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Dialing+PJSIP+Channels) : exten => _9XXXX.,1,Log(NOTICE...

...rot.org ReportedBy: calestyo at scientia.net Hi. The manpage says to ProxyCommand: >The command string extends to the end of the line, >and is executed with the user's shell. So I'd have assumed that the following works: Host *.exmaple.org ProxyCommand ssh -W %h:%p gateway1.exmaple.org || ssh -W %h:%p gateway2.exmaple.org But it doesn't, even not in modifications like: ProxyCommand { ssh -W %h:%p gateway1.exmaple.org ; } || { ssh -W %h:%p gateway2.exmaple.org ; } or so. Is this intentional or a bug? What works however is explicitly invoking another shel...

...bably need to remove the 'realm' line so that it will match any > realm in the challenge. > > >> >> [sonnyGW1] >> type=aor >> contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 >> >> [sonnyGW1] >> type=endpoint >> transport=transport-udp >> context=gateway1 >> allow=!all,ulaw >> outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth >> aors=sonnyGW1 >> >> [sonnyGW1] >> type=identify >> endpoint=sonnyGW1 >> match=65.254.44.194 >> >> My extensions.conf stub for the appropriate section looks like this (from >> https...

Hi all, My machine has got two network cards and both of them are connected to two different ISPs. I have added two ISPs to my default gateway with same metric. Let a.b.c.d be the IP of 1st network card and e.f.g.h be the ip of the second network card i.e., Card1 - IP=a.b.c.d, Gateway=gateway1.isp1.net Card2 - IP=e.f.g.h, Gateway=gateway2.isp2.net route add -net 0/0 gw gateway1.isp1.net metric 0 route add -net 0/0 gw gateway2.isp2.net metric 0 My problem is, if I try to access the 1st Network card (a.b.c.d -- ISP1) from a remote machine, sometimes the connection takes a...

...sername=sonny > realm=gw1.sip.us > You probably need to remove the 'realm' line so that it will match any realm in the challenge. > > [sonnyGW1] > type=aor > contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 > > [sonnyGW1] > type=endpoint > transport=transport-udp > context=gateway1 > allow=!all,ulaw > outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth > aors=sonnyGW1 > > [sonnyGW1] > type=identify > endpoint=sonnyGW1 > match=65.254.44.194 > > My extensions.conf stub for the appropriate section looks like this (from > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Dialin...

Hi, I'm trying to share a machine that's on the other side of a gateway. The machine being shared is a Linux (kernel 2.2.1 (RedHat 5.2) and samba 2.0.3), and the box trying to access it is NT4.0 with SP5. It looks something like this ------- --------- ------ |Linux|-----------|Gateway|----------| NT | ------- --------- ------ 192.168.32.72

...d, the device is seized and apparently passed to the DomU. A new udev rule was added with the physical NIC MAC address. Additionally, I was able to configure the NIC through /etc/network/interfaces. Any attempt to use the NIC (eth2), such as a ping command, results in the following errors: root@gateway1:~# [ 98.816957] e1000: eth2: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang [ 98.816963] Tx Queue <0> [ 98.816965] TDH <3> [ 98.816967] TDT <3> [ 98.816969] next_to_use <3> [ 98.816971] next_to_clean <0> [ 98.816973] buffer_info[next_to_clean] [ 98.816975] time_stamp <ff...

...that it will match any >> realm in the challenge. >> >> >>> >>> [sonnyGW1] >>> type=aor >>> contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 >>> >>> [sonnyGW1] >>> type=endpoint >>> transport=transport-udp >>> context=gateway1 >>> allow=!all,ulaw >>> outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth >>> aors=sonnyGW1 >>> >>> [sonnyGW1] >>> type=identify >>> endpoint=sonnyGW1 >>> match=65.254.44.194 >>> >>> My extensions.conf stub for the appropriate sect...

...e challenge. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>> type=aor >>>> contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 >>>> >>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>> type=endpoint >>>> transport=transport-udp >>>> context=gateway1 >>>> allow=!all,ulaw >>>> outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth >>>> aors=sonnyGW1 >>>> >>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>> type=identify >>>> endpoint=sonnyGW1 >>>> match=65.254.44.194 >>>> >>>> My exten...

...t; >>>>> >>>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>>> type=aor >>>>> contact=sip:65.254.44.194:5060 >>>>> >>>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>>> type=endpoint >>>>> transport=transport-udp >>>>> context=gateway1 >>>>> allow=!all,ulaw >>>>> outbound_auth=sonnyGW1_auth >>>>> aors=sonnyGW1 >>>>> >>>>> [sonnyGW1] >>>>> type=identify >>>>> endpoint=sonnyGW1 >>>>> match=65.254.44.194 >>&g...

...Gateway0 will have eth0 attached to br0 giving it connectivity to the Internet. Eth1 on Gateway0 will connect to an internal only-network, xenbr0, upon which will reside a bunch of other DomUs. The latter communicate with the outside world according to the NAT firewall rules running on Gateway0. Gateway1 is attached to both br0 (outside world) and xenbr1 (private network of DomUs) and so on. Basically then, any DomUs which have a network interface possessing an external IP will be on br0 and xenbr(x), all other DomUs will be on xenbr(x) only. All of this was created on Fedora 17 with xen4.1. I r...

I have the following pair of macros defined to handle outbound calls from *. Rather than specifying full dialstrings in the main body of extensions.conf, outbound dial commands are made using a macro call as follows: Macro (outbound,number_to_dial,callerid_to_present,gateway1,gateway2,gateway3,gate way4) The final gateway defined is nearly always a fallback to PSTN if none of the IAX or SIP gateways are working. The problem is, its an incredibly unwieldy macro that's horrible to edit if I want to add a new gateway to the thing. Looking through the documentation fo...

Hi, Today's setup is : Legacy PBX1 with E1 ------- Leased line ----- Legacy PBX2 with E1 Prospective setup is : PBX1 ------- Asterisk GateWay1 (with Digium E1) ------ IP network ------ Asterisk GW2 (with Digium E1) ----- PBX2 Is there a way to tunnel, transport or translate Q.SIG signals between both PBXs ? The IP network is just used for point to point leased lines replacement : failover or other fancy features are not required. As I&...

...out. If I turn off my ip rules I can then view the URL on my Clients but of course external routing falls apart. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-eth2 from 173.11.51.45 table Cable /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-eth3 from 67.152.166.2 table T1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 GATEWAY1=192.168.4.3 NETMASK1=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS1=192.168.6.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.4.2 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS0=192.168.5.0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1 GATEWAY0=192.168.4.1 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS0=192.168.4.0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth2 173.11.51.44/30 dev eth2 p...

...om smtp.www-service.de (smtp.www-service.de [212.77.161.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6F564A6C for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2521 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 20:44:03 -0000 Received: from www.lisegainc.com (HELO gateway1.lisega.com) (@66.21.122.34) by smtp.www-service.de with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 20:44:03 -0000 Received: from joyce-eng.lisega.com ([192.0.0.172]) by gateway1.lisega.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA05187; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:45:13 -0400 Received: by joyce-eng.lisega.com with Microsoft Mail id &...