search for: ganna

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer te...

On 18/02/2015 23:29, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com...

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Sanitizer Runtime Developers, >> >> We recently ran into a problem building clang because some of the >> definitions in sanitizer_common conflicted with system definitions and later >> another system header was trying to use the system de...

Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (in case you still need mine) > > On Thu, Feb 12,

Hi Sanitizer Runtime Developers, We recently ran into a problem building clang because some of the definitions in sanitizer_common conflicted with system definitions and later another system header was trying to use the system definition: .../usr/include/libkern/OSAtomicDeprecated.h:756:17: error: reference to 'memory_order_relaxed' is ambiguous __theAmount, memory_order_relaxed) +

Begin forwarded message: > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:49:43 -0700 > From: Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC/Heads Up: Deprecating External Build > Support > To: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <5DC34E5E-1633-44CC-B4CE-F8FD6FAEA3BE at apple.com> &gt...

John, Thanks for making the results of the analyzer available. Ted has recently added IPA support for C++, so the number of bugs reported increased dramatically. In some cases our diagnostic clarity is still lagging behind for C++ bugs that span multiple functions (it's WIP). Cheers, Anna. On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:06 AM, John Smith wrote: > Hi, > > > Just for fun, I decided to

Hi, Just for fun, I decided to run the svn r159506 llvm/clang/c++-analyzer on svn r159506 llvm-clang. I just thought that it might be interesting to run the analyzer on the llvm-clang codebase itself. I guess that most people on this list will probably have at least some knowledge of the llvm codebase, and be able to determine any false positives relatively easily ?. And for the truly

I think libfuzzer deserves its own flag. I view fuzzing as a smarter testing technology while sanitizers are associated with inserting additional checks into the program. The different linking behavior is another major difference. Anna. > On Apr 27, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > on the one hand, -fsanitize=fuzzer might

> On Feb 28, 2016, at 7:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Feb 26, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Alexey Samsonov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, David Blaikie <dbla...

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> If the community thinks this is an important problem for LLVM to >> address, then I think the ideal solution is that we provide a set of >> autoconf/makefile/whatever foo that uses llvm-config and so...

Another difference is the presence of exceptions in C++, which would require you to handle more IR instructions. This might not matter depending on type of analysis you do. See: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_invoke (Note that there is a substantial rewrite of exception handling going into 3.0) Anna. On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 September 2011 03:30, Eli

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:05 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 28, 2016, at 7:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 2:10...

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Alexey Samsonov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:3...

On 22 September 2011 03:30, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am trying to find such difference of bitcode between C and C++. > > There isn't any difference in that sense... in IR, a constructor is > just a function call, a reference is just a pointer, etc. Hi Fei, While Clang (like others) lowers C++ into C semantics and lower that into IR, there are

+kremenek, ganna On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > > asanin favor of OSX's native function int...

...However, I will plan on doing this by refactoring the existing test-suite and sample project to work that way, instead of removing them completely. - Daniel On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jeff Fifield <fifield at colorado.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com> wrote: >> On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> If the community thinks this is an important problem for LLVM to >>> address, then I think the ideal solution is that we provide a set of >>> autoconf/makefile/whatever foo that uses ll...

On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:42:15PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > +kremenek, ganna > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > > > asanin favor of...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. > So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing mach_override. > > --kcc Kostya, Unless I am misunderstanding the code in asan/asan_intercepted_functions.h,

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Alexey Samsonov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote: > > >