search for: gain

Hi All, I have some Polycom IP300's and I'm interested in increasing the max volume for the headset (not handset), I'm wondering if anyone has experience adjusting these values: <gains voice.gain.rx.analog.handset="0" voice.gain.rx.analog.headset="0" voice.gain.rx.analog.chassis="3" voice.gain.rx.analog.chassis.obs="-12" voice.gain.rx.analog.chassis.IP300="-6" voice.gain.rx.analog.ringer="3" voice.gain.rx.analog.ringer...

I have FLAC files that I would like to re-encode with --replay-gain. I have my Flac's organized in Artist/Album folders, so I should have no problem getting an album gain/peak per album. Do I need to first de-code the flac's to wav files and then "flac --replay-gain *.wav", or can this be accomplished by going to each Album directory and "f...

Could not find your post for 4 months ago. -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Anton Krall" <akrall-lists@intruder.com.mx> > Yes, check a post that I made about 4 months ago, I posted the cofig for > setting the speaker, handset and ring volumes .. > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >

...et the following in my log (/var/log/asterisk/full): Mar 15 17:16:55 VERBOSE[4242] logger.c: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Mar 15 17:16:55 VERBOSE[4242] logger.c: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found Mar 15 17:16:55 DEBUG[4242] chan_zap.c: Failed to read gains: Invalid argument Mar 15 17:16:55 DEBUG[4242] chan_zap.c: Failed to read gains: Invalid argument Mar 15 17:16:55 DEBUG[4242] chan_zap.c: Updated conferencing on 1, with 0 conference users Mar 15 17:16:55 VERBOSE[4242] logger.c: -- Registered channel 1, PRI Signalling signalling Mar 15 17:16:55...

...] logger.c: [chan_zap.so] => (Zapata Telephony w/PRI) Jan 5 01:27:11 VERBOSE[22490] logger.c: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Jan 5 01:27:11 VERBOSE[22490] logger.c: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found Jan 5 01:27:11 DEBUG[22490] chan_zap.c: Failed to read gains: Invalid argument Jan 5 01:27:11 DEBUG[22490] chan_zap.c: Failed to read gains: Invalid argument Jan 5 01:27:11 DEBUG[22490] chan_zap.c: Updated conferencing on 1, with 0 conference users Jan 5 01:27:11 VERBOSE[22490] logger.c: -- Registered channel 1, PRI Signalling signalling Jan 5 01:27...

On Monday 11 February 2008 05:04:25 Pyt wrote: > Can you elaborate on what you mean by "correctly use" ? > > On Feb 11, 2008 1:03 AM, Christopher Brown <c-b@asu.edu> wrote: > > Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files > > that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added > > from a > > cue sheet)? As I understand it, flac generates replay-gain values for each flac file that you pass (it assumes they are each a track and that they comprise an album...

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:39:12 -0700 "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: >Ian Nartowicz wrote: >> The Opus replaygain spec is fundamentally broken, so let's ignore that for >> now. It is discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, but isn't going to change any >> time soon. > >I haven't seen anyone make any concrete proposals for how it should >change. Maybe I missed something. > >AFAI...

...mafn, method = "BFGS", hessian = TRUE, control = optim.control, : non-finite finite-difference value [2] I looked into the code (file src/arima.c of the stats package) and noticed that this second element is a sum of logarithmic terms, computed through the following snippet of code: gain = M[0]; for (j = 0; j < d; j++) gain += delta[j] * M[r + j]; if(gain < 1e4) { nu++; ssq += resid * resid / gain; sumlog += log(gain); } Here, sumlog is the second element of the resulting vector. However, the "if(gain < 1e4) {" check does not explicitly check against...

Dear R Users, I have a couple of proto objects like: wedge <- proto(expr={ start.year <- 2008 end.year <- 2050 }) star.rating <- wedge$proto( star = c(4, 5, 8, 10), gain = c(0, .3, .5, .7), cost = c(0, 2100, 4000, 7500), star.rating <- function(., year) 6.0, setup = function(.){ .$cost.for.star <- approxfun(.$star, .$cost) .$gain.for.star <- approxfun(.$star, .$gain) }, test = function(., year) {...

Otras variantes con y sin paquetes adicionales... > sapply(split(datIn$Gain, as.factor(datIn$Diet)), mean) d1 d2 d3 280 278 312 > by(datIn$Gain, datIn$Diet, mean) datIn$Diet: d1 [1] 280 -------------------------------------------------------------- datIn$Diet: d2 [1] 278 -------------------------------------------------------------- datIn$Diet: d3 [1] 312 > > l...

I just bought an I Audio mobile device (Btw, these thigns are the coolest players on the face of the earth.. might want to check em out). It plays ogg vorbis files rather nicely. My whole music library is sitting in flac format. When I encoded my flac files (the majority a year ago) I used replay gain to save the album and track information if the flac file. Unfortunately, the I audio doesnt like the replay gain headers (I'm submitting a bug report over there to get this fixed). So, my only option right now is to use vorbisgain to strip the replay info out of the ogg file thats generated wh...

...ategoria? > Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:13:45 +0100 > From: cof en qualityexcellence.es > To: jbetancourt en iscmc.cmw.sld.cu > CC: r-help-es en r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R-es] pregunta > > Otras variantes con y sin paquetes adicionales... > > > sapply(split(datIn$Gain, as.factor(datIn$Diet)), mean) > d1 d2 d3 > 280 278 312 > > by(datIn$Gain, datIn$Diet, mean) > datIn$Diet: d1 > [1] 280 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > datIn$Diet: d2 > [1] 278 > ----------------------------------------------------...

...; > It's actually a bit more complicated, because it's more like "AEC -> > Noise Suppressor -> VAD -> AGC", even if the VAD decision isn't used by > the consumer, right. Because the VAD decision needs to be used by AGC, > so that it isn't raising the gain of background noise (although it > should probably lower the gain when there's any signal higher than it's > threshold). > > For AAGC, though, I guess one way to do this would be if you could > somehow "transport" the un-cancelled, un-noise-suppressed energy level...

--- libcelt/Makefile.am | 6 +- libcelt/bands.c | 26 +++++++++- libcelt/bands.h | 2 +- libcelt/celt.c | 23 +++----- libcelt/pgain_table.h | 133 ------------------------------------------------- libcelt/quant_pitch.c | 117 ------------------------------------------- libcelt/quant_pitch.h | 44 ---------------- 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 314 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 libcelt/pgain_table.h delete mode 10064...

I am working with a longitudinal data set in the long format. This data set has three observations per grade level per year. Here are the first 10 rows of the data frame: >tenn.dat[1:10,] year schid type grade gain se new cohort 6 2001 100005 5 4 33.1 3.5 4 3 7 2002 100005 5 4 33.9 3.9 4 2 8 2003 100005 5 4 32.3 4.2 4 1 10 2001 100005 5 5 22.9 4.0 5 4 11 2002 100005 5 5 25.0 3.4 5 3 12 2003 100005 5 5 7.8 3.8 5 2 1...

I have an X100p card....and it is hard to hear the person on the other end. Should I mess with these values? I have heard both yes and no to this question in the past. If yes, how much louder should I make them? Thanks, MIchael

OK, here's a problem: I want to set the album replay gain in each track, but I'm using grip to rip and encode the tracks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: c...

Hi, I'm a FLAC beginner and I had a question about the meaning of track and album gain. I think it's a stupid question, but hey, I must learn it somewhere ;) So I wanted to know what track and album gain means. I use winamp for playing my encoded FLAC files and when I look at the properties of a FLAC file I can see this: track gain: not present album gain: not present So I was...

...essage----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric "ManxPower" Wieling Sent: 05 January 2007 08:10 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.c: Failed to read gains: Invalidargument Lee Archer wrote: > I am running Asterisk 1.2.14 and Zaptel 1.2.12 and using a Digium > TE110P card in E1 mode. I've recently noticed in my logs the > following > > Jan 5 01:27:11 VERBOSE[22490] logger.c: [chan_zap.so]Jan 5 01:27:11 > VERBOSE[22490]...

2007/4/1, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com>: > > Those are Replay Gain elements. Please check on Wikipedia or > Hydrogenaudio for more information on RG. In short, they are values > to normalize in a lossless way the audio volume. Hi, But how can this be possibly lossless? You change the volume of the audio tracks, so isn't this lossy or does the actua...